196,253 research outputs found
Parque Industrial do Xisto: estratégia de desenvolvimento local para São Mateus do Sul - PR
No full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Programa de Pós-Graduaçã em Geografia.Esta dissertação tem por objetivo estudar os espaços criados, transformados e influenciados pela instalação da Petrobrás-SIX no município de São Mateus do Sul, a partir de suas atividades iniciadas em 1967, quando a Petrobrás S.A. decide desenvolver uma tecnologia nacional para o aproveitamento energético das reservas de xisto. São Mateus do Sul foi o município escolhido para a instalação da Petrobrás-SIX, pois neste existiam as maiores e melhores reservas de xisto do Brasil, o que possibilitaria as condições mais propícias para o desenvolvimento de uma tecnologia para o aproveitamento energético desse bem mineral. Na época em que a Petrobrás-SIX inicia suas atividades em São Mateus do Sul, este município estava em um período de crise econômica. A instalação da Petrobrás-SIX em São Mateus do Sul representaria uma nova possibilidade de desenvolvimento econômico, onde a estatal seria o novo nexo à dinâmica da economia local. Entretanto, foi materializado apenas uma pequena parte do projeto inicial da Petrobrás S.A. A administração local de São Mateus do Sul, percebendo que a Petrobrás S.A. não mais construiria o Complexo Industrial do Xisto, decide elaborar um estratégia local de desenvolvimento econômico baseada na utilização integral do xisto, e não só na utilização deste para a produção de energia. Foi criada, então, a Incubadora Tecnológica de São Mateus do Sul (ITS), local onde empresas podem iniciar suas atividades com base no xisto. Para atingir o objetivo geral desse trabalho, tivemos como objetivos específicos: contextualizar a industrialização brasileira, a necessidade energética nacional e o desenvolvimento de uma tecnologia para utilizar o xisto como recurso energético na economia brasileira; caracterizar os aspectos físico-territoriais, histórico-culturais e socioeconômicos de São Mateus do Sul antes da instalação da Petrobrás-SIX; identificar e descrever as atividades da Petrobrás-SIX em São Mateus do Sul e; evidenciar a atual estratégia local de desenvolvimento econômico em São Mateus do Sul. O procedimento de trabalho baseou-se em levantamento e análise de dados através de bibliografia e entrevistas. A referencia teória sobre o lugar foi fundamentada nas formulações de Milton Santos e de Idaleto Malvezzi Aued
Leucothoe campi Mateus & Mateus 1986
No full text<i>Leucothoe campi</i> Mateus & Mateus, 1986 (<i>nomen novum</i>) <p> <i>Leucothoe denticulata</i> Mateus & Mateus, 1966: 175–177, figs 1, 2. — Wakabara <i>et al.</i>, 1991: 69–77 (not Costa, 1851: 177). <i>Leucothoe campi</i> Mateus & Mateus, 1986: 142–144 (<i>nomen novum</i>). — Krapp-Schickel & Menioui, 2005: 81.</p> <p> <i>Leucothoe mateusae</i> Barnard & Karaman, 1991: 412 (<i>nomen novum</i>).</p> <p> <b>Type locality and specimens.</b> Ponta de Mina, Island Principe, Gulf of Guinea. Holotype, male, 4.5 mm; paratypes, male, 3 mm (mutilated), juveniles, 2.0 and 1.2 mm (mutilated).</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> No material available for examination. Diagnosis based on description by Mateus & Mateus (1966) and Krapp-Schickel & Menioui (2005).</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Gnathopod 2 basis distally expanded with anterior serrations; carpus distally truncate; and propodus palm with 3–4 major tubercles.</p> <p> <b>Note.</b> Mateus & Mateus described <i>Leucothoe denticulata</i> sp. n. in 1966, but were unaware that <i>Leucothoe denticulata</i> Costa, 1851 was a valid species. They created a nomen novum (<i>Leucothoe campi</i>) for the species in 1986. Barnard & Barnard (1991) were unaware of this and created a homonym for this species (<i>Leucothoe mateusae</i>). Mateus & Mateus’ original description of <i>Leucothoe campi</i> (as <i>Leucothoe denticulata</i>) is very vague with illustrations of only gnathopods 1 and 2. Examination of type or topotypic material is necessary to clarify diagnostic characters for this species.</p> <p> <b>Female</b> (sexually dimorphic characters). No significantly sexually dimorphic character.</p> <p> <b>Habitat.</b> Habitat and depth not reported.</p> <p> <b>Host.</b> Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Atlantic Ocean: Gulf of Guinea, Africa (Mateus & Mateus 1966; Mateus & Mateus 1986; Krapp-Schickel & Menioui 2005), Brazil (Wakabara <i>et al</i>. 1991).</p>Published as part of <i>White, Kristine N., 2011, A taxonomic review of the Leucothoidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) 3078, pp. 1-113 in Zootaxa 3078 (1)</i> on pages 46-47, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3078.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5243821">http://zenodo.org/record/5243821</a>
Gammarus pretzmanni Mateus & Mateus 1990
No full textGammarus pretzmanni Mateus & Mateus, 1990 Gammarus pretzmanni Mateus & Mateus, 1990: 286 –289, Figs. 2 – 2 a; G. projectus Stock, Mirzajani, Vonk, Naderi & Kiabi, 1998: 201 –205, Figs. 17–20; Khalaji-Pirbalouty & Sari, 2004: 2428 – 2429; Ebrahimnezhad, Hosseini & Sari, 2005: 223, Fig. 3, new synonym. Locus typicus. 43 km W of Arak (34 ˚02ʹN, 49 ˚ 22 ʹE), Markazi Province. Material examined. Holotype and paratypes, Markazi Province (34 ˚02ʹN, 49 ˚ 22 ʹE) (NHMW Amphipoda 4871). Holotype and paratypes of G. projectus Sarabe Abbasabad, Shahzand, Markazi Province (33 ˚ 55 ʹN, 49 ˚ 30 ʹE) (ZMA Crust. Amph. 201376). Distribution. This species was reported from the inside and from eastern outskirts of upper and central Zagros mountains, in different localities (Mateus & Mateus, 1990; Stock et al., 1998; Khalaji-Pirbalouty & Sari, 2004; Ebrahimnezhad et al., 2005) (Fig. 1). Ecological notes. No ecological data is available. Taxonomic remarks. Originally described by Mateus and Mateus (1990), this taxon was overlooked by most amphipod researchers, even the publication itself was not mentioned in any of the subsequent studies upon gammarids. Examined type material of this species was absolutely identical to that of G. projectus. Thus, Gammarus projectus is a junior synonym of G. pretzmanni. Loci typici of both species are localities on the same river, very close to each other, what makes our statement even more obvious. This species is very close to G. komareki and G. parthicus, but the state of highly curled setae on dorsal and ventral of antenna 2 (Mateus & Mateus, 1990, Fig. 2 c) characterizes it among other species. See also Taxonomic remarks on G. p a r t h i c u s and G. komareki.Published as part of Zamanpoore, Mehrdad, Grabowski, Michal, Poeckl, Manfred & Schiemer, Friedrich, 2011, Taxonomic review of freshwater Gammarus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Iran, pp. 1-14 in Zootaxa 3140 on pages 8-9, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20563
Airs and solids : Aires mateus
No full texthttp://librarysearch.auckland.ac.nz/UOA2_A:Combined_Local:uoa_alma2126744006000209
La administración del señor Otálora
No full textDocumento en el que el abogado Francisco de Paula Mateus realiza una defensa post mortem del expresidente José Eusebio Otálora, acusado por parte de los miembros del liberalismo radical, de haber cometido irregularidades durante su gobierno presidencial.
A lo largo del documento, Mateus cuestiona y condena los sentimientos de reproche y enemistad de quienes acusaron a Otálora
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Platorchestia monodi Mateus, Mateus & Afonso 1986
No full textPlatorchestia monodi (Mateus, Mateus & Afonso, 1986) (Figs 7–10) Orchestia monodi Mateus, Mateus & Afonso, 1986: 100: figs. 1–7. Orchestia platensis — Oliveria, 1953: 329, figs. 10–12; Soares, 1979: 98. Platorchestia platensis (Kroyer, 1845) forma monodi (Mateus, Mateus & Afonso, 1986) — Stock & Biernbaum, 1994: 796, fig. 1. Platorchestia monodi — Morino & Ortal, 1995: 825, figs. 1–3; Stock, 1996: 150, figs. 2–4 (part). Material examined. Paraíba — Cabedelo Harbor, PB, 9 males and 17 females, I/ 1964, MNRJ 9762. Pernambuco — Maria Farinha, Paulista, in mangrove, PE, 4 females, 31 / VII/ 1985, MNRJ 9790. Alagoas Mundaú Lagoon, Maceió, AL, 1 male and 2 females, A. Lemos de Castro col., 2 /VIII/ 1978, MNRJ 10841. Espírito Santo — Santa Cruz, ES, 6 males and 30 females, A. Lemos de Castro col., 19 /I/ 1973, MNRJ 9758; Barra de Itabapoana, ES, 2 males and 3 females, A. Lemos de Castro and B. dos Prazeres col., 7 /XI/ 1973, MNRJ 9768. Rio de Janeiro — Rodrigo de Freitas Lagoon, RJ, 6 males and 9 females, C. Serejo col., 25 /V/ 2002, MNRJ 18448; Guaíba Island, Mangaratiba, RJ, 12 males, 35 females, 24 /VII/ 2002, MNRJ 18443; Mambucaba, RJ, A. Lemos de Castro & B. dos Prazeres col., 16 /XII/ 1974, MNRJ 9759. São Paulo — Cananéia, Arrozal, SP, 13 females, A. S. Tararam col., X/ 1988 to I/ 1989, MNRJ 15074; 2 females, MNRJ 15078; 1 female, MNRJ 15081; 2 males, MNRJ 15084; 1 female, MNRJ 19108; Iguape, SP, 5 males and 16 femlaes, Y. Wakabara col, 19 /VII/ 1985, MNRJ 15126. Paraná — Fortaleza beach, Ilha do Mel, PR, 50 males, 65 females, C. Serejo and P. Young col., 04/II/ 1999, MNRJ 18442; Pontal do Sul beach, PR, 1 male and 17 females, C. Serejo and P. S Young col., 3 /II / 18445, MNRJ 18445. Santa Catarina — Caieria beach, Florianópolis, SC, 6 males and 45 females, C. Serejo & P. Young col., 16 /II/ 1999, MNRJ 18440; Brava beach, Camboriú, SC (near river estuary), 1 male, C. Serejo and P.S. Young col., 18 /II/ 1999, MNRJ 18441; Porto Belo, SC, 100 specimens, 28 /XI/ 1987, MNRJ 9765. Comparative type material. " Orchestia platensis Kr., Montevideo. 13 / 12 40. Beslemte oj opstill. af Kroyer. Silbert hans Anj. Exemplares". Lectotype, 1 male, 12.3 mm, ZMUC 8221; Paralectotypes, 1 male, 6.8 mm; 1 female, 7.6 mm; 7 damage specimens, ZMUC 7803. Diagnosis. Male gnathopod 1 subchelate, dactylus cuspidactylate and shorter than palm. Male gnathopod 2 palm with very shallow medial concavity. Posterior lobe of coxa 6, anterodistal corner with or without distinct process. Male pereopod 7 merus and carpus not expanded. Oostegite 5 posterior margin with the same number of setae of anterior margin. Uropod 3, peduncle and ramus subequal in length. Telson emarginated, each side with two pairs of robust setae on lateral margin and 3 distal robust setae. Description. Male, 12.8 mm. Antenna 1 reaching the end of article 4 of peduncle of antenna 2, flagellum with about 6 articles. Antenna 2 with peduncle incrassate, flagellum with about 14 articles (Fig. 7 A). Mandible with left lacinia mobilis 5 dentate. Maxilla 1, inner plate with two distal plumose setae; outer plate with 9 dentate robust setae, palp reduced and 1 articulate. Maxilla 2, inner plate with several distal setae and a robust proximal plumose seta; outer plate a little larger than inner plate. Maxilliped palp 3 articulate and densely setose, article 2 with mediodistal inner lobe, medial robust setae absent. Gnathopod 1 subchelate (Fig. 7 B, C), carpus and propodus with welldeveloped posterodistal lobe, dactylus cuspidactylate and shorter than palm. Gnathopod 2 robust (Fig. 7 D), palm with several robust setae and a very shallow medial concavity, dactylus not attenuated distally. Coxa 2–4 about as wide as deep, with well developed posterior process (Fig. 7 D–F). Pereopod 4 distinctly shorter than pereopod 3; carpus about 2 X longer than wide; dactylus thickened (Fig. 7 F). Pereopod 5 (Fig. 7 G) slightly longer than half of pereopod 6, pereopods 6–7 subequal in length (Fig. 8 A, B). Posterior lobe of coxa 6 with a 90 º anteroventral angle, anterodistal process absent (Brazilian population). Pereopod 6, basis oval (Fig. 8 A). Pereopod 7 not sexually dimorphic, basis rounded; merus and carpus not expanded (Fig. 8 B). Coxal gills 2–6 simple or slightly convoluted, gills 2 and 6 larger than gills 3–5. Pleopods 1–3 similar and not reduced, rami subequal in length and slightly shorter than peduncle. Peduncle of pleopod 1 lacking setae; pleopods 2 peduncle with 4–5 medial robust setae; pleopod 3 peduncle with 4–5 subdistal robust setae and 2 proximal robust setae. Uropod 1 inner ramus, inner margin with 5 robust setae and outer margin with 4 robust setae; outer ramus lacking marginal setae (Fig. 8 C). Uropod 2 (Fig. 8 D) outer ramus with one marginal robust seta. Uropod 3 (Fig. 8 E), peduncle and ramus subequal in length, peduncle with 3 to 4 subdistal robust setae, ramus with marginal and distal setae. Telson (Fig. 8 F) longer than wide, emarginated and with a distinct medial line, each side with two pairs of robust setae on lateral margin and 3 distal robust setae. Female, 8.5 mm. Peduncle of antenna 2 not incrassate. Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 9 A) minutely subchelate. Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 9 B), basis enlarged. Coxal gill 2 as long as gnathopod 2 basis. Oostegites 2–5 oval (Fig. 9 C–F). Oostegites 2–4 long and slender, about 4 times longer than wide, with 9–11 marginal setae; oostegite 5 shorter, about 2.5 times longer than wide, with 4–5 setae, posterior margin with the same number of setae of the anterior margin. Variation. The medial concavity present in the palm of male gnathopod 2 is variable according with the development of the specimens. Juveniles observed (7.3 to 10 mm) do not present this concavity. Type locality. Azores Island, Atlantic Ocean. Distribution. MidAtlatic Islands: Azores, Ascension, Madeira; Western Atlantic: Guadeloupe (West Indies); West Florida and Charleston, USA (Biernbaum & Stock, 1994; Stock, 1996); Negev Desert, Israel (Morino & Ortal, 1995). Records from Madeira and Guadeloupe are as P. platensis, although Stock (1996) considered them as possible P. m o n odi. Careful examination of material from these areas is needed for confirmation of the above records. Ecology. Found on the sea shore of Azores and Brazilian coast. Prefer protected beaches and can be found in estuarine areas and mangroves. Some authors found this species on inland areas on altitudes of 762–792 m (Stock, 1996) and near springs and wells (Morino & Ortal (1995). Remarks. Bousfield (1982) erected the genus Platorchestia, including 5 species from North Pacific, and P. platensis, considered a nearly cosmopolitan species along tropicaltemperate coastlines. Nowadays, the genus includes 13 described species (Table 2), although the generic status of some species has been questioned, especially within the terrestrial taxa (Jo, 1988; Richardson, 1991). Among these, there are three Atlantic sibling species that needs careful examination for an accurate identification. These are P. platensis originally described from Montevideo, Uruguay, P. monodi from warmtemperate and subtropical zones of the Atlantic Ocean, and P. aschmoleorum Stock, 1996 from lowlatitude zones of St. Helena Island (Stock, 1996). Jo (1988) observed the cuspidactylate male gnathopod 1 to distinguished P. platensis from other similar species within the genus. Only three species within Platorchestia has a cuspidactylate male gnathopod 1, P. platensis, P. monodi, and P munmui Jo (1988). For distinguishing these three species see key bellow. As discussed by Stock & Biernbaum (1994) and Stock (1996) the distinction of P. platensis and P. monodi are sometimes quite difficult to observe, mainly because most of the characters used are age dependent. Thus, the syntype series of P. platensis was examined, a lectotype designated and compared with the Brazilian material (Fig. 10 A–D). The diagnostic character pointed out by Jo (1988) for P. platensis as the cuspidactylate gnathopod 1, and posterior lobe of coxa 6 with anterodistal lobe was confirmed. The sexual dimorphism on male antenna 2 and pereopod 7 was also observed (Fig. 10 A, E). The presence of one or two notches on the palm of male gnathopod 2 has been used to diagnostic P. platensis (Jo, 1988; Stock & Biernbaum, 1994). The lectotype (12.3 mm) showed a sinuous palm, without a definite notch, although this character seems to be extremely variable within the development of general talitrids and its use as diagnostic should be carefully applied. The Brazilian material has the palm of gnathopod 2 with a shallow medial notch and also more robust setae when compared with P. platensis lectotype. Also, the former lacks the process on anterodistal corner of coxa 6 (present in P. p l a t e n s i s) and carpus of male pereopod 7 is not expanded. Specimens observed by Oliveira (1953) from Guanabara Bay, RJ also do not have pereopod 7 expanded, suggesting that his material might be P. monodi or a juvenile form of P. p l a t e n s i s. The Brazilian specimens agrees with the original description of P. monodi Mateus et al. (1986) in general aspects, except that the former has the anterodistal corner of posterior lobe of coxa 6 without process (vs. with process). Distinction from Stocks (1996) material was noticed on the female gnathopod 2 with gill as long as the basis (vs. half size of basis). Comparing with material from Israel (Morino & Ortal, 1995), they also described coxa 6 posterior lobe without process, although the maxilliped palp article 2 lacks robust setae (vs. present or absent), and male antenna 2 is wellincrassate (vs. slightly incrassate). This is the first record of P. monodi from the Brazilian coast.Published as part of Serejo, Cristiana S., 2004, Talitridae (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) from the Brazilian coastline, pp. 1-29 in Zootaxa 646 on pages 14-21, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15864
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Pedro como personagem no evangelho de Mateus: complexidade e inversão
No full textThis article focuses on the apostle Peter as a character in the Gospel of Matthew. It aims at identifying the nuances and changes of the character Peter in the Gospel. For this purpose, I take as a starting point that the gospel belongs to the literary genre of ancient Greco-Roman Biography, which presents Jesus Christ as the protagonist. The other characters are developed in relationship with him. The same is true with the Apostle Peter. The article unfolds from narrative theory, in particular the categorization of characters. I categorize, based on Erich Auerbach and Robert Alter, the features of biblical characters, developing comparisons with theories of the character in the modern novel. The analysis of the main texts from the Gospel of Matthew that portray the character Peter leads to the conclusion that its main features are complexity and inversion. They produce an overview of the involution of the character in the narrative of the Gospel of Matthew.Este artigo tematiza o apóstolo Pedro como personagem no evangelho de Mateus. O objetivo é identificar as nuances e transformações do personagem Pedro no evangelho. Para tanto, tomo como ponto de partida a pertença do evangelho ao gênero literário biografia greco-romana, que apresenta Jesus Cristo como protagonista. Os demais personagens são desenvolvidos em relação com ele. O mesmo se dá com o apóstolo Pedro. O texto se desenvolve a partir da teoria narrativa, de modo particular a caracterização de personagens. Identifico, a partir de Erich Auerbach e Robert Alter, as características de personagens bíblicos, tecendo comparações com teorias do personagem no romance moderno. A análise de textos do evangelho de Mateus que retratam o personagem Pedro leva à conclusão que suas principais características são a complexidade e a inversão. Elas produzem uma visão geral da involução do personagem na narrativa do evangelho de Mateus
Africorchestia spinifera Mateus 1962
No full text<i>Africorchestia spinifera</i> (Mateus, 1962) <p>(Figs 5, 6)</p> <p> <i>? Orchestoidea fischeri.</i> ― Chevreux, 1911: 231 (in part).</p> <p> <i>Orchestia spinifera</i> Mateus, 1962: 10, figs 1–20. ― Marques & Bellan-Santini, 1985: 332, 352, table 1. <i>Talorchestia spinifera.</i> ― Amanieu & Salvat, 1963: 69, fig. ― El Kaim, 1963: 169. ― Amanieu & Salvat, 1965: 59, figs 2–6. ― Marfin, 1983: 232, figs 2, 3. ― Menioui & Bayed, 1986: 112.</p> <p> <b>Types.</b> Holotype, male, 16 mm, IZAN 90. Paratypes: IZAN.</p> <p> <b>Type locality.</b> Beaches of River Guadiana at Vila Real de Santo Antonio, Portugal (~ 37°10.9’N 7°24.2’W).</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Based on male. <i>Gnathopod 2</i> propodus ovate, palm extremely acute, subsigmoidal, extending about 75% along posterior margin, without rounded protuberance near dactylar hinge, with shallow distal notch, with two rows of robust setae along entire margin, without proximal tooth; dactylus subequal in length to palm. <i>Pereopods 6–7</i> much longer than pereopods 3–5. <i>Pereopod 6</i> longer than pereopod 7; basis expanded posteriorly. <i>Pleonite 1</i> with a pair of dorsodistal pointed spines. <i>Pleonite 2</i> with 2 pairs of dorsal pointed spines. <i>Pleonite 3</i> with 1 anterior pair of longer pointed spines and a pair of ridge-like posterodistal rounded protrusions. <i>Uropod 3</i> ramus subequal in length to peduncle, 3.3 x as long as broad. <i>Telson</i> entire apically notched with 11 apical robust setae on each side.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> Apparently <i>A. fischeri</i> and <i>A. spinifera</i> both have two dorsodistal spines on pleonite 1. They have very differently shaped male second gnathopods and in <i>A. fischeri</i> the basis of pereopod 6 is grossly enlarged and vertically ovate.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> <i>France</i>. Bay of Biscay: Isle aux Oiseaux, Arcachon, 44°42.1’N 1°10.5’W (El Kaim 1963); Arcachon, 44°39.6’N 1°8.6’W (Amanieu & Salvat 1965). <i>Morocco</i>. Estuaries of Oued Ghrifa, Asilah, ~ 35°31’N 06°00’W (current study); Bou Regreg, 34°2.3’N 6°49.9’W (El Kaim 1963; Amanieu & Salvat 1965; Meniou & Bayed 1986); Agadir, Massa, Sidi Ifni, 29°23’N 10°10.5’W (Marfin 1983). <i>Portugal</i>. River Guadiana, 37°10.2’N 7°22.8’W (Mateus 1962). <i>Spain</i>. Cadiz, 36°31.8’N 6°18.4’W (Chevreux 1911; Amanieu & Salvat 1983).</p>Published as part of <i>Lowry, James K. & Coleman, Charles Oliver, 2011, Africorchestia a new genus of sand-hoppers (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Talitridae) from western Africa and south-western Europe, pp. 55-68 in Zootaxa 2825</i> on pages 62-65, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/277263">10.5281/zenodo.277263</a>
- …
