178,290 research outputs found

    Review of "Th����tre de femmes de l���Ancien R��gime" by Arianne Margolin, Syracuse University.

    No full text
    Aurore Evain, Perry Gethner, and Henriette Goldwyn, eds. Th����tre de femmes de l���Ancien R��gime. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2022. 601pp. 39���. Review by Arianne Margolin, Syracuse University

    An Interview with Robin Luke M.D., E. Gordon Margolin, M.D., and J. Wesley Alexander M.D.

    No full text
    An interview with Robin Luke, M.D., E. Gordon Margolin, M.D., and J. Wesley Alexander, M.D., March 3, 2011. Interview and introduction by John J. McDonough, M.D. This video was a part of the Henry R. Winkler Center Oral History series.This oral history may be streamed from the Winkler Center website</a

    Barthel (P.), Scheurer (R.), Stauffer (R.). Actes du Colloque Guillaume Farel (Neuchâtel, 29 septembre - 1er octobre 1980).

    No full text
    Margolin Jean-Claude. Barthel (P.), Scheurer (R.), Stauffer (R.). Actes du Colloque Guillaume Farel (Neuchâtel, 29 septembre - 1er octobre 1980). . In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 65, fasc. 2, 1987. Histoire - Geschiedenis. pp. 480-481

    Guggisberg (Hans R.) Lestringant (Frank) Margolin (Jean-Claude) éds La Liberté de conscience (XVIe -XVIIe siècles)

    No full text
    Poulat Emile. Guggisberg (Hans R.) Lestringant (Frank) Margolin (Jean-Claude) éds La Liberté de conscience (XVIe -XVIIe siècles) . In: Archives de sciences sociales des religions, n°80, 1992. p. 308

    Review of "Memento Marie: Regards sur la gal��rie M��dicis" edited by Emmanuelle H��nin and Val��rie Wampfle.

    No full text
    Emmanuelle H��nin and Val��rie Wampfler, eds. Memento Marie: Regards sur la gal��rie M��dicis. Reims: ��PURE, 2019. 512 pp. + 60 illustrations. 25���. Review by Arianne Margolin, Syracuse University

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Pratiques et discours alimentaires à la Renaissance. Actes du colloque de Tours, 1979. Sous la direction de J.-C. Margolin et R. Sauzet, 1982

    No full text
    Hudry Marius. Pratiques et discours alimentaires à la Renaissance. Actes du colloque de Tours, 1979. Sous la direction de J.-C. Margolin et R. Sauzet, 1982. In: Le Monde alpin et rhodanien. Revue régionale d'ethnologie, n°1-2/1983. p. 137

    La liberté de conscience (XVIe-XVIIe siècles), Actes du Colloque de Mulhouse et Bâle (1989), réunis par Hans R. Guggisberg, Frank Lestringant et Jean-Claude Margolin

    No full text
    Soulié Marguerite. La liberté de conscience (XVIe-XVIIe siècles), Actes du Colloque de Mulhouse et Bâle (1989), réunis par Hans R. Guggisberg, Frank Lestringant et Jean-Claude Margolin. In: Bulletin de l'Association d'étude sur l'humanisme, la réforme et la renaissance, n°33, 1991. pp. 102-103

    "Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"

    No full text
    Both spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore