1,720,998 research outputs found
Eupolybothrus fasciatus Newport 1845
No full textEupolybothrus fasciatus (Newport, 1845) Lithobius fasciatus: Fanzago, 1874: 31 Lithobius fasciatus: Fedrizzi, 1876: 232 Lithobius fasciatus: Manfredi, 1933: 268 Bothropolys fasciatus: Manfredi, 1933: 269 Polybothrus praecursor alarichi Attems, 1934: 317 syn. nov. Polybothrus (Bothropolys) apenninigenus: Manfredi: 1956: 6 Polybothrus fasciatus: Manfredi, 1956: 7 Bothropolys (Polybothrus) fasciatus: Manfredi, 1957: 24, 25, 36, Fig. 22 Bothropolys (Polybothrus) praecursor alarichi: Manfredi, 1957: 24, 37 Bothropolys appenninigenus (sic): Manfredi, 1957: 19, 25, 36 Eupolybothrus (E.) fasciatus: Matic, 1966: 337 Eupolybotbrus fasciatus: Matic, 1971: 246 MATERIALE ESAMINATO: 2 exx., Campania (Salerno), dint. Atena Lucana, m 500, 1.IV.1986, MZ; 2 exx., Campania (Salerno), Roscigno Vecchio, m 500, 1.IV.1986, MZ; 4 exx., Campania (Salerno), dint. Campora, m 700, 2.IV.1986, MZ; 1 ex., Campania (Salerno), Monte Scanno del Tesoro, m 700, 1.IV.1986, MZ; 23 exx., ibidem, m 1000, 1.IV.1986, MZ; 1 ex., Campania (Salerno), dint. Vallo della Lucania, m 700, MZ; 1ex., Campania (Salerno), Monte Gelbison, m 1000, MZ; 9 exx., Campania (Salerno), dint. Celle di Bulgheria, m 300, MZ; 4 exx., Lucania (Potenza), Monte Vulture, Grotticelle d’Ofanto, 8.IV.1970, VS; Lucania (Potenza), Monte Volturino, m 1000, 23.V.1984, MZ; 2 exx., Lucania (Potenza), Monte di Viggiano, m 1500, 23.V.1984, MZ; 3 ex., Lucania (Potenza), Policoro, Bosco Pantano, 27.IX.1976, AVT; 1 ex., ibidem, 29.IX.1976, AVT; 2 exx., ibidem, 30.XI.1976, AVT; 3 exx., Lucania (Potenza), Massiccio del Pollino, Colle Gaudolino, m 1500-1680, 9.VII.1983, CM; 1 exx., Massiccio del Pollino, da Colle Gaudolino a vetta, m 1680-1850, 9.VII.1983, MZ; 1 ex., Massiccio del Pollino, Monte Pollino, m 1100, 11.VI.1977, RA; 1 ex., ibidem, m 1100, 2.VI.1977, RA; 3 exx., ibidem, m 1500, 2.VI.1977, RA; 2 exx., ibidem, 1500-1850, 9.VII.1983, EC; 1 ex., ibidem, 9.VII.1983, IM; 3 exx., ibidem, 9.VII.1983, MZ; exx., Massiccio del Pollino, Piano di Ruggio, m 1500, 10.VII.1983., MB; 5 exx., ibidem, 10.VII.1983, MZ; 1 ex., Massiccio del Pollino, Col Dragone, 8.VIII.1969, VV; 2 ex., Calabria (Cosenza), Monti di Orsomarso, Monte la Mula, loc. Pantanelli, m 670 circa, 11.VII.83, IM; 1 ex.Monti di Orsomarso, Monte la Mula, m 800 circa, 11.VII.1983, CM; 1 ♂, " Busento bei Cosenza " (Lectoypus di Polybothrus praecursor alarichi Attems, 1934, M. Zapparoli designavit, 1906) (NHMW); 2 ♀♀, " Sud-Italien, Falconara Albanese, 18 Km westl.Cosenza, 24/25.9.1925 ". (Paralectotypi di Polybothrus pmecursor alarichi Attems, 1934, M. Zapparoli designavit, 1985) (ZMH); 1 ♂, " Sud-Italien, Sapri (Golf v. Policastro), 5.10.1925 ", (Paralectotypus di Polybothrus praecusor alarichi Attems, 1934, M. Zapparoli designavit, 1985) (ZMH); 1 ♀, " Sud-Italien, Pignola, SW Potenza, 800 m, 15.10.1925 " (Paralectotypus di Polybothrus praecursor alarichi Attems, 1934, M. Zapparoli designavit, 1986) (ZMH). I rapporti tassonomici esistenti tra questa specie e la precedente sono attualmente in fase di revisione. Minelli (1985) ipotizza l’esistenza di una superspecie che includerebbe anche E. longicornis (Risso), a corologia alpina, nonché probabilmente altre entità dello stesso genere, a gravitazione Sud-europea. Per il momento preferisco mantenere la distinzione tra Eupolybothrus fasciatus ed E. grossipes in quanto il materiale relativo ad entrambe le specie, da me controllato ed identificato sulla base delle ridescrizioni fornite da Eason (1970), è agevolmente distinguibile. Il materiale da me esaminato comprende anche gli esemplari sulla base dei quali Attems (1929) ha descritto Polybothrus praecursor alarichi Constatando la corrispondenza di tale materiale con la descrizione di E. fasciatus fornita da Eason (1970), ritengo opportuno proporre la seguente sinonima: Polybothrus praecursor alarichi Attems, 1934 = Eupolybothrus fasciatus (Newport, 1845)syn. nov.Published as part of M. Zapparoli, 1986, Il popolamento dell'Appennino meridionale: dall'Appennino campano alle serre calabre. Osservazioni sui chilopodi dell'Appennino lucano e calabrese (Chilopoda), pp. 311-340 in Biogeographia 10 (1984) on pages 318-31
La vegetazione macrofitica e algale della Riserva Naturale di Popolamento Animale Salina di Tarquinia.
No full text
Eupolybothrus nudicornis Gervais 1837
No full textEupolybothrus nudicornis (Gervais, 1837) Lithobius impressus: Fanzago, 1880: 267, 269 Botbropolys elogantus calabrus Manfredi, 1933: 269, Fig. 1 Botbropolys elongantus (calabrus)?: Manfredi, 1957: 19, 25, 36 Lithobius impressus: Manfredi, 1957: 24 Bothropolys impressus: Manfredi, 1957: 25 Eupolybothrus elongatus: Matic e Darabantzu, 1971: 400 Eupolybothrus elongatus: Matic, 1971: 247 Bothropolys elongatus Newp. subsp. calabrus: Manfredi, 1976: 231 MATERIALE ESAMINATO: 1 ex., Campania (Salerno), dint. San Rufo, m 600, 1.IV.1986, MZ; 1 ex., Lucania (Potenza), Monticchio, 20.IV.1965, PC (sub Eupolybothrus elongatus (Newport, 1849) in Matic, 1971) (MR); 2 exx., Lucania (Potenza), Monte Sirino, Lago Laudemio, m 1525, 5.VII.1983, MB; 5 exx., ibidem, 5.VII.1983, MZ; exx., Calabria (Cosenza), Monti di Orsomarso, Monte la Mula, gallleria artificiale sorgenti loc. Pantanelli, m 670, 11.VII.83, MB. Sulla base della descrizione originale, ritengo che la ssp. Calabra: Manfredi, 1933 non sia chiaramente distinta dalle altre popolazioni peninsulari di E. nudicornis.Published as part of M. Zapparoli, 1986, Il popolamento dell'Appennino meridionale: dall'Appennino campano alle serre calabre. Osservazioni sui chilopodi dell'Appennino lucano e calabrese (Chilopoda), pp. 311-340 in Biogeographia 10 (1984) on page 32
Centipedes and edaphic microarthropods as indicators of changing conditions in beech forest ecosystems
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
