1,723,843 research outputs found
John M. Carter
Black and white head shot of John M. Carter, Instructor, Library, 1961-1964.https://thekeep.eiu.edu/archives_faculty_ad/1162/thumbnail.jp
N (or M.) Carter in naval uniform
N (or possibly M.) Carter in naval uniform taken by various studios overseas. He drowned at Indooroopill
Dominique M. Carter : Young Alumni Award
Dominique M. Carter ’09 won the Young Alumni Award in 2018, her bio is archived here from the SNC website
Sanford Bates Correspondence from Robert M. Carter
A letter addressed to Sanford Bates from Robert M. Carter concerning the publication of "Readings in Probation and Parole" and requesting permission to use material from "When is Probation Not Probation?
Résumé du Représentant de l'UNICEF, M. Carter
Ce document présente un résumé du représentant de l’UNICEF, M. Carter. Le représentant ne se sentant pas qualifié pour traiter techniquement le sujet de la conférence, se propose d’évoquer les moyens dont dispose l’UNICEF pour résoudre certains problèmes sociaux connexes
D. M. Carter, The Politics of Greek Tragedy, 2007
Byl Simon. D. M. Carter, The Politics of Greek Tragedy, 2007. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 78, 2009. pp. 270-271
D. M. Carter, The Politics of Greek Tragedy, 2007
Byl Simon. D. M. Carter, The Politics of Greek Tragedy, 2007. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 78, 2009. pp. 270-271
03/29/1948 Letter from Brigadier General George M. Carter
Letter from Brigadier General George M. Carter to Louis-Philippe Gagné.https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/fac-lpg-letters-1948-01-06/1023/thumbnail.jp
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
