1,721,219 research outputs found
Wrecked Car of James M. Randolph, Nov. 1936
No full textGordon Christensen, Wrecked Car of James M. Randolph, 11/25/36
Memorial Services For Miss Ellen M. Randolph
No full textFuneral program for Miss Ellen M. Randolph. The funeral was held Monday, July 26, 1982 at Second Baptist Church, officiated by Reverend S. H. James. Funeral arrangements were made through Carter-Taylor-Williams Mortuary and she was buried in La Grange Cemetery in La Grange, Texas
Thomas M. Randolph to James Brown, June 21, 1797
Full text linkThomas M. Randolph wrote to James Brown. The letter is a short personal correspondence talking about various topics such as his health and the latest harvest. Contents are very difficult to decipher.https://digitalcommons.kean.edu/lhc_1790s/1491/thumbnail.jp
Thomas M. Randolph to James Brown, June 17, 1796
Full text linkThomas M. Randolph in Monticello, Charlottesville, VA wrote to James Brown, unaddressed. This letter detailed a sale of wheat and clarified a previous letter. People included: Snelson, Nicholson.https://digitalcommons.kean.edu/lhc_1790s/1456/thumbnail.jp
David M. Randolph wrote to James Brown, May 14, 1796
Full text linkDavid M. Randolph wrote to James Brown, addressed to Richmond, VA. This letter discussed a bill for which Randolph requested immediate remittance. Places included: Philadelphia.https://digitalcommons.kean.edu/lhc_1790s/1455/thumbnail.jp
Thomas M. Randolph to James Brown, November 12, 1796
Full text linkThomas M. Randolph in Milton, VA wrote to James Brown, unaddressed. Randolph drew on Brown for $46.72 for the Sherriff of Albemarle County. He looked to make another draft on Mr. Brown for payments to John Watson and Dr. [Currie]. People included: Mr. [Inliafino], John Watson, Dr. Currie, Snelson. Places: Albemarle.https://digitalcommons.kean.edu/lhc_1790s/1459/thumbnail.jp
Lynn M. Randolph e Donna J. Haraway: la parabola del cyborg tra scienza e narrazione
Full text linkObject of reflection will be the ideal dialogue between Lynn M. Randolph and Donna J. Haraway. It will attempt to observe how the narrative parable of the painter represents the changes of human corporeal identity, which is eroded increasingly by technology. The works of the artist are aesthetic manifestations of the hybridisation metaphorized by the figure of cyborg, chimerical creature placed to the center of speculation of the philosopher.Keywords: Body, cyborg, morphogenesis, biopolitics, science fictionAbstractOggetto della riflessione sarà il dialogo ideale tra Lynn M. Randolph e Donna J. Haraway. Si tenterà di osservare come la parabola narrativa della pittrice, racconto dei mutamenti di forma dell’umana identità corporea, sempre più erosa dalla tecnologia, costituisca il riflesso estetico del processo di métissage sensoinformazionale che trova compiuta realizzazione nella figura del cyborg, creatura chimerica collocata al centro della speculazione della filosofa.Parole chiave: Corpo, organismo cibernetico, morfogenesi, biopolitica, fantascienz
Lynn M. Randolph e Donna J. Haraway: la parabola del cyborg tra scienza e narrazione
No full textOggetto della riflessione sarà il dialogo ideale tra Lynn M. Randolph e Donna J. Haraway. Si
tenterà di osservare come la parabola narrativa della pittrice, racconto dei mutamenti di forma
dell’umana identità corporea, sempre più erosa dalla tecnologia, costituisca il riflesso estetico del
processo di métissage sensoinformazionale che trova compiuta realizzazione nella figura del
cyborg, creatura chimerica collocata al centro della speculazione della filosofa
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
