1,721,720 research outputs found

    Ivan Krylóv: Fabler

    No full text
    This is a serious edition of Krylov's fables. It is complete and careful to follow Krylov's order of fables. About every six pages there is a good black-and-white illustration. The only colored illustration (12) repeats the cover's portrait of Krylov. The text margins are generous and the illustrations large. Fables and illustrations that caught my attention on this viewing of the book include The Trigamist (I 20); The Bag (III 7); Author and Robber (VI 24); and The Crow (VII 26). I do not yet understand the fit between fable and image in Leaves and Roots (IV 2). It strikes me that Krylov's illustrators present his fables as quite stark. For all their seriousness, Aesop and La Fontaine seem to draw more fun out of artists. The key fables in Krylov, both borrowed and new, tend to have illustrations here, as is only right. Each fable has a comment in a section near the book's end. That section is followed by an acknowledgement of the eight artists -- Brjullov, Kandaurov, Panov, Petrov, Popov, Sapozjnikov, Serov, and Trutovskij -- and four institutions whose art is presented here. The last two elements of the book are a T of C and an AI of fables. This is one of the heavier books that made my Scandinavian burden a challenge flying home from Europe!This is a hardbound book (hard cover)Language note: DanishPa dansk ved Lars P. Poulsen-Hansen & Holger Scheibe

    A new deep-sea eelpout of the genus Pyrolycus (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) associated with a hydrothermal seep on the Pacific margin of Costa Rica

    Full text link
    Frable, Benjamin W., Seid, Charlotte A., Bronson, Allison W., Møller, Peter Rask (2023): A new deep-sea eelpout of the genus Pyrolycus (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) associated with a hydrothermal seep on the Pacific margin of Costa Rica. Zootaxa 5230 (1): 79-89, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5230.1.

    FIGURE 1 in First records of the rare eelpout Lycenchelys xanthoptera Anderson, 1991 (Teleostei, Zoarcidae) in the Ross Sea, Antarctica

    No full text
    FIGURE 1. Lycenchelys xanthoptera, Iselin Bank, Ross Sea, Antarctica. (a) Colour image of NMNZ P.038579, 268 mm SL, male: 4 years after preservation, C. Struthers NMNZ; (b) Line drawing of NMNZ P.038575, 269 mm SL, male, drawing, Michelle Freeborn NMNZ.Published as part of Struthers, Carl D. & Møller, Peter R., 2009, First records of the rare eelpout Lycenchelys xanthoptera Anderson, 1991 (Teleostei, Zoarcidae) in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, pp. 65-68 in Zootaxa 2196 (1) on page 66, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2196.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/532139

    Fishes

    No full text
    Rapport overde ichtyologiske feltundersøgelser ved al-Zubârah i Qatar i feltsæsonen 2012

    FIGURE 3 in Revision of the Bahamian cave­fishes of the genus Lucifuga (Ophidiiformes, Bythitidae), with description of a new species from islands on the Little Bahama Bank

    No full text
    FIGURE 3. Lucifuga lucayana. (A) Lateral view of head, Holotype, ANSP 146475, female, 99 mm SL, Grand Bahama Island; (B) Median view of right otolith, ZMH 9566, male, ca. 125 mm SL, Grand Bahama Island; (C) Ventral view of same otolith, ZMH 9566.Published as part of Møller, Peter R., Schwarzhans, Werner, Iliffe, Thomas M. & Nielsen, Jørgen G., 2006, Revision of the Bahamian cave­fishes of the genus Lucifuga (Ophidiiformes, Bythitidae), with description of a new species from islands on the Little Bahama Bank, pp. 23-46 in Zootaxa 1223 on page 32, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore