1,720,982 research outputs found
Books reviews
No full textObra ressenyada: Luis LUQUE TORO, Diccionario contextual de locuciones preposicionales. Granada: Granada Lingvistica, 2009
Book Reviews
No full textObra ressenyada: Luis LUQUE TORO (ed.), Léxico español actual. Venecia- Treviso: Ed. Cafoscarina, 2006
Book Reviews
Get PDFObra ressenyada: Luis LUQUE TORO (ed.), Léxico español actual. Venecia- Treviso: Ed. Cafoscarina, 2006
Books reviews
No full textObra ressenyada: Luis LUQUE TORO, Diccionario contextual de locuciones preposicionales. Granada: Granada Lingvistica, 2009
Homenaje al profesor Manuel Alvar Ezquerra en Italia
No full textJuan Villena Ponsoda; Antonio Ávila Muñoz; Luis Luque Toro (eds.), Homenaje al profesor Manuel Alvar Ezquerra en Italia, Padova, Linea Edizioni, 2024, 374 pp. ISBN 979128156210
El tercer y el cuarto capítulo de la primera parte del 'Quijote' de Franciosini: observaciones sobre la traducción de algunos elementos
No full textAmong the translators from Spanish active in the 17th century, a leading role was played by Lorenzo Franciosini, the grammarian, lexicographer and author of the first translation of 'Don Quijote' into Italian. The original text by Cervantes is here compared with Franciosini’s translation, published in 1622, to evaluate a range of translational choices and their rationale. Broadly speaking, Franciosini’s translation can be considered reliable, although mistakes emerge deriving from inaccuracies and miscomprehensions. This study only focuses on the third and fourth chapter of part one, pending further investigation on the remaining tex
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
