1,720,962 research outputs found
A framework for scheduling and resource allocation in LTEdownlink using Nash bargaining theory
In this paper, we propose a game theoretical model for joint scheduling and radio resource allocation in the downlink of a Long Term Evolution system, where Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access is used as the multiple access scheme. The context is that of spectrum sharing, with multiple users competing for the simultaneous access to the radio channel.
We first give a layered system representation and then model it through a game theoretic formulation using Nash Bargaining theory, where players cooperate to achieve a better common payoff. A trade-off between fairness and throughput is identified and addressed. In addition, we also propose an efficient algorithm that drives the system toward a balanced Pareto efficient operating point represented by the Nash Bargaining solution. Numerical results are also provided to show the validity of the proposed approach
A characterization of resource allocation in LTE systems aimed at game theoretical approaches
A performance evaluation tool for spectrum sharing in multi-operator LTE networks
Recent advances in wireless networking introduce the concept of resource sharing as one promising way to enhance the performance of radio communications. As the wireless spectrum is a scarce resource, and its usage is often found to be inefficient, it may be meaningful to design solutions where multiple operators join their efforts, so that wireless access of their terminals takes place on shared, rather than proprietary to a single operator, frequency bands. In spite of the conceptual simplicity of this idea, the resulting mathematical analysis may be very complex, since it involves analytical representation of multiple wireless channels. Simulation studies may be extremely useful to obtain a correct performance characterization of wireless networks with shared resources. In this spirit, the present paper introduces and evaluates an original extension of the well known ns-3 network simulator, which focuses on multiple operators of the most up-to-date cellular scenarios, i.e., the Long Term Evolution of UMTS employing OFDMA multiplexing. Spectrum sharing is represented through a proper software architecture, where several sharing policies can be framed. A detailed simulation campaign is run to assess the computational performance of the proposed architecture, and to show its effectiveness in analyzing realistic scenarios. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Capacity gains due to orthogonal spectrum sharing in multi-operator LTE cellular networks
Abstract-Static spectrum allocation leads to resource wastage and inter-operator spectrum sharing is a possible way to improve spectrum efficiency. In this work, we assume that two cellular network operators agree upon sharing part of their spectrum, which can then be dynamically accessed by either of them in a mutually exclusive way. Our goal is to numerically assess the gain, in terms of cell capacity, due to such orthogonal spectrum sharing. Hence, we propose a centralized algorithm that performs coordinated scheduling, in order to numerically evaluate an upper bound on the achievable sum capacity. The algorithm is centralized and exploits complete information on both networks to perform the optimum allocation. The simulation results illustrate the impact of the multiuser diversity and the asymmetry in the traffic load among the networks on the overall achievable gain
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Simulation models for the performance evaluation of spectrum sharing techniques in OFDMA networks
Cooperation in wireless networks is an important means to improve the resource utilization efficiency. It finds an interesting application in the context of spectrum sharing, where multiple wireless users put their licensed frequency bands in common in order to achieve a better resource usage. Due to the complexity of the problem, mathematical analysis is typically focused on simple scenarios. However, we believe that, in order to obtain a concrete proof of concept of the sharing paradigm, it is mandatory to assess its performance in realistic situations, i.e., with a larger number of nodes and a wider range of applications. Therefore, the support of a proper simulation environment is fundamental for high-quality applied research. In this paper we present and evaluate an original extension of the well known ns-3 network simulator which focuses on multiple operators of the most up-to-date cellular scenarios, i.e., the Long Term Evolution of UMTS employing OFDMA multiplexing. We describe the software architecture that enables the spectrum sharing and, in particular, allows operators to interact in order to agree on a spectrum division. A sample sharing policy is given as well, and a detailed simulation campaign is run to validate the proposed architecture, assess its efficiency, and evaluate the simulation time related to scenarios with an increasing number of nodes
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
