1,720,975 research outputs found
Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: A new prospective in the treatment of lung cancer
Lung cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. Current treatment modalities, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, provide only limited improvement in the natural course of this disease. Therefore, the development of new therapeutic strategies is highly awaited. This review focuses on recent achievements on a novel class of anticancer drugs targeting the EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor). The EGFR family is a group of four structurally similar growth factor receptors with tyrosine-kinase activity (EGFR, HER2/neu, ErbB-3, ErbB-4), which dimerize upon binding with a number of ligands, including EGF (Epidermal Growth Factor) and TGF (Transforming Growth Factor), allowing downstream transduction of mitogenic signals. Overexpression of EGFR and HER2 is frequently found in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for over 80% of all malignant lung tumors, and has been associated with a worse clinical outcome. New agents developed to inhibit EGFR function include monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. In this review, results of most recent clinical with EGFR inhibitors including monoclonal antibodies, such as Trastuzumab (Herceptin), IMC-C225 (Cetuximab) and others (ABX-EGF, EMD 72000), and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, such as ZD1839 (Gefitinib, Iressa), OSI-774 (Erlotinib, Tarceva) and others (CI-1033, GW2016), are summarized. In particular, final results of phase II (IDEAL 1 and 2) and III (INTACT 1 and 2) studies of ZD1839 are reported. In IDEAL trials (ZD1839 single agent in patients pre-treated with chemotherapy) there was clear evidence of tumor regression, symptoms improvement and overall clinical benefit, whereas in the two INTACT trials (ZD1839 in combination with standard platinum-based chemotherapy in chemo-naive patients) ZD1839 did not improve either survival or other clinical endpoints. Possible explanations for these contradictory results and future perspectives are discussed. © 2004 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd
The role of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer
Brain is the most common site of metastatic spread in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Approximately 10% of SCLC patients have brain metastases (BM) already at diagnosis and an additional 40% will develop central nervous system (CNS) involvement during their disease course. Although whole brain radiotherapy and corticosteroids is considered the treatment of choice, accumulating evidence suggests that systemic chemotherapy may also play an important role. The concept of the brain as a pharmacologic sanctuary site for established metastases is in contrast with recent clinical observations of frequent BM responses with systemic chemotherapy. During the last decade, several reports about the effect of systemic chemotherapy on BM from SCLC have been published. Pooled data from five studies report 66% response rate (RR) in 64 patients with initial BM. In addition, an average RR of 36% is derived from five studies including 135 patients with delayed BM treated with systemic single agent chemotherapy. Among new drugs with activity in patients with SCLC brain metastases, camptothecin analog topotecan is one of the most promising with a 52% RR. Although whole brain radiation remains the standard treatment of established BM in SCLC there is an emerging role for systemic chemotherapy, particularly with the use of new active drugs as part of combined modality treatments
In vitro study of farnesyltransferase inhibitor SCH 66336, in combination with chemotherapy and radiation, in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines
K-ras alterations have been reported in 20-30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and represent a suitable target for the development of novel anticancer agents, such as Farnesyl transferase inhibitors (FTi), a new class of agents inhibiting the post-translational modification of the K-ras proteins. The effectiveness of FTi SCH66336 in inhibiting cell proliferation and deranging cell cycle of NSCLC cell lines as well as its interaction with chemotherapy or radiation have been evaluated. The activity of Fri SCH66336, alone or in combination with paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and radiotherapy, was examined in 3 cell lines, A-549, LX-1 and CaLu-6, by colorimetric MTT assay. Cell cycle perturbation and apoptosis were also assessed by cytofluorimetric analysis. The activity of SCH 66336 was found to be concentration- and time-dependent. The effect of SCH 66336, as demonstrated by cell,growth recovery experiments, resulted cytostatic and it was superimposable in both cell lines bearing 2 different K-ras mutations (A-549 and LX-1) and in K-ras wild-type Ca-Lu-6. In all cell lines the combination of SCH 66336 and paclitaxel resulted in a synergism of action when SCH 66336 followed paclitaxel treatment, whereas, antagonism was found when SCH 66336 preceded paclitaxel treatment. No significant synergism or addition with SCH 66336 followed by radiation treatment was noted. Different cell cycle phase blocks at various drug concentrations were observed. In conclusion, SCH 66336 displays concentration-dependent cytostatic antitumour activity and schedule-dependent synergy with 2 commonly used anticancer agents in NSCLC cell lines. Further clinical testing of these combinations is warranted
Disease stabilization (SD) as a surrogate end-point in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib (E) or gefitinib (G)
Difference between skin toxicities in erlotinib (E) and gefitinib (G) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Pre-clinical evaluation of new antineoplastic agents in NSCLC cell lines: evidence of histological subtype-dependent cytotoxicity
The antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, topotecan, SN-38 and cis-platin was studied on 5 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines, 3 of which were adenocarcinoma (ADK) and 2 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Cellular chemosensitivity was determined using the MTT in vitro assay after 48, 72 and 96 h of exposure to drug in concentration ranging from 0.001 to 100 microM. A concentration-dependent cell growth inhibition was observed for paclitaxel, gemcitabine, topotecan, SN-38 and cis-platin in all cell lines tested. Docetaxel showed a concentration-independent cytotoxicity and was 104 times more potent than cis-platin (IC50 = 0. 001 vs. 10 microM). Paclitaxel, gemcitabine, topotecan and SN-38 were 102 times more potent than cis-platin, with median IC50 = 0.1 microM at 72 h. The level of drug-induced cell growth inhibition appeared to be correlated, for some of the six drugs tested, with the tumor histological subtype. In particular, topotecan and cis-platin were more active in squamous cell carcinoma than in adenocarcinoma cell lines (p=0.006 and 0.001 respectively at 0.1 microM concentration), while paclitaxel was more active in ADK than in SCC cell lines (p=0.004 at 0.01 microM concentration). Ca-Lu-6, a cell line that, contrary to most other lung cancer cell lines, is wild-type for most oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes, was by far the most sensitive cell line used (p=0.002, 0.003, 0.01 for paclitaxel, topotecan and cis-platin respectively, at 1 microM concentration), showing a >50% growth inhibition to new drugs at a concentration of 0.01 microM. In conclusion, all these new compounds tested were found to be more potent than cis-platin in affecting cellular proliferation of six NSCLC cell lines studied. We suggest that the specific histological subtype and molecular pattern of the cell line being treated could affect the antiproliferative effect of these drugs
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Disease stabilization (SD) as a surrogate end-point in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib (E) or gefitinib (G)
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
