1,720,972 research outputs found
Anatomia e fisiologia dell’ospedale
No full textL'ospedale, essenziale nella fornitura di cure specialistiche per pazienti acuti, varia in tipologie e gestione, includendo strutture pubbliche, private e accreditate. La categorizzazione comprende Presidi Ospedalieri, Aziende Ospedaliere, Policlinici Universitari, Aziende Ospedaliere miste, IRCCS, ospedali classificati e istituti privati accreditati. Questi centri devono garantire servizi essenziali come pronto soccorso, degenza, operatori, diagnostica, e farmacia, seguendo modelli organizzativi che favoriscono l'integrazione tra unità operative. Il Decreto Ministeriale 70/2015 enfatizza l'integrazione ospedale-comunità, proponendo una riorganizzazione per ottimizzare l'efficacia assistenziale e contenere i costi
Influenza Vaccination of Nurses and Other Health Care Workers in Different Occupational Settings: A Classic and AI Mixed Approach for Time-to-Event Data
Full text linkBackground: Seasonal influenza currently remains a major public health concern for the community and, in particular, the health care worker (HCW). According to the World Health Organization, HCWs are among the high-risk categories for which vaccination is recommended, due to the derived absenteeism, productivity loss, and high probability of transmitting the disease to vulnerable individuals or patients. Therefore, an HCW vaccination policy should be adopted by every health care provider. There is growing evidence that a time effect of the vaccination event is probable, which may influence vaccine effectiveness. We designed and conducted an observational study to investigate the time to anti-influenza vaccination event of different categories of HCWs belonging to different occupational settings in a tertiary hospital during three seasons in order to retrieve some insight about HCW prioritization when designing vaccination campaigns. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the results of two HCW anti-influenza vaccination campaigns (2022 and 2023) to assess any difference regarding job typology and unit typology (critical care, surgical, medical, service). We first fitted a classic Cox proportional hazard model and then an AI random forest model to assess variable importance. We used R, RStudio, and the survex package. Results: Overall, other HCWs reported a lower vaccination rate compared to nurses (HR 0.77; 95%CI 0.62–0.97), and service unit personnel appeared to more likely be vaccinated (HR 1.42; 95%CI 1.01–1.99) compared to those belonging to the critical care units. As expected, older workers tended to be vaccinated more frequently (HR 1.70 for the (46, 65] category compared to the younger one; 95%CI 1.39–2.09). The variable importance analysis showed consistent superiority of the ward typology and age category variables with respect to time. During the entire timeline, the ward typology appeared to be more important than the HCW typology. Conclusions: Our results suggest a prioritization policy based firstly on the unit typology followed by the job typology for HCW anti-influenza campaigns
Conspiracy beliefs, COVID-19 vaccine uptake and adherence to public health interventions during the pandemic in Europe
Full text linkBackground: Conspiracy beliefs can be a major hindrance causing a lack of compliance with public health measures, including vaccination. We examined the relationship between individual attitudes, socio-demographic factors, conspiracy beliefs, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and preferences about pandemic policies in Europe. Methods: We used data from the 10th round of the European Social Survey, conducted in 2021-22 in 17 European countries. Both a conspiracy index and a personal attitude index for each participant were built by using a Latent Class Analysis model. Then, we used a multilevel regression model to investigate the relationship between a personal attitudes index, socio-demographic factors and country of residence, and a conspiracy index. We descriptively analyse the relationship between the conspiracy index and four main items related to COVID-19. Results: We found that a higher probability of believing in conspiracy theories was associated with male gender, middle age, lower levels of education, unemployment, lower levels of trust and satisfaction and right-wing political orientation. The country of residence was a contextual factor, with eastern European countries having higher levels of conspiracy beliefs. Individuals who expressed conspiracy beliefs had lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake, were less satisfied with the way health services coped with the pandemic and less supportive of governmental restrictions. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the factors associated with conspiracy beliefs and their potential impact on public health. The findings highlight the need for effective strategies to address the underlying factors driving conspiracy beliefs, reduce vaccine hesitancy and promote acceptance of public health interventions
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Counting the Cost: The Economic Toll of Discrimination Against LGBTQAI+ Individuals in Italy
No full textThis study investigates the financial consequences of perceived
discrimination towards LGBTQAI+ people in Italy, focusing
on psychological support and medication costs. It highlights
the burden of discriminatory experiences, emphasizing the
need for policies to minimize costs. A cost analysis was
performed according to the NHS perspective. A purposive
sample was recruited through a web-based survey spread on
Italian researchers’ social networks, asking any LGBTQAI+
readers to answer about discriminatory experiences, access to
psychological support, and medication use. Costs of health
services use were estimated according to the Italian NHS tariffs
and Italian Psychologists’ Board. The time horizon was set at
one year and discounting was not necessary. Robustness was
checked by a one-way sensitivity analysis. A total of 75
LGBTQAI+ people completed the survey. Most of them (aged
26-35 years, 85%; residing in big cities, 70%; unaffiliated with
LGBTQAI+ associations, 88%) reported discriminative actions
(60%), with 15% seeking psychological help soon after being
victim of a single discriminatory act. Verbal and physical abuse
were reported by 88% and 6% respectively. 40% of
respondents claimed to have resorted to psychotherapy
sessions because of the discomfort felt after acts perceived as
discriminatory or violent, amounting to 810 total therapy
hours. The total therapy cost was E72,900, of which 60% paid
as out-of-pocket expenses, and 40% partially covered by
regional Local Health Units. Additionally, 12% of respondents
used SSRI or benzodiazepines, costing the National Health
System an esteemed E3054. The sensitive analysis confirmed
the robustness of results. The study demonstrates the
significant economic burden of discrimination against
LGBTQAI+ individuals in Italy, emphasizing the need for
inclusive policies and accessible mental health support. Further
research is required to explore indirect costs, for a comprehensive understanding of the total economic impact
Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature
Full text linkBACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy continues to limit global efforts in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging research demonstrates the role of social media in disseminating information and potentially influencing people's attitudes towards public health campaigns. This systematic review sought to synthesize the current evidence regarding the potential role of social media in shaping COVID-19 vaccination attitudes, and to explore its potential for shaping public health interventions to address the issue of vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the studies published from inception to 13 of March2022 by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsychNET, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE. Studies that reported outcomes related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (attitudes, opinion, etc.) gathered from the social media platforms, and those analyzing the relationship between social media use and COVID-19 hesitancy/acceptance were included. Studies that reported no outcome of interest or analyzed data from sources other than social media (websites, newspapers, etc.) will be excluded. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of all cross-sectional studies included in this review. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021283219). FINDINGS: Of the 2539 records identified, a total of 156 articles fully met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of the cross-sectional studies was moderate – 2 studies received 10 stars, 5 studies received 9 stars, 9 studies were evaluated with 8, 12 studies with 7,16 studies with 6, 11 studies with 5, and 6 studies with 4 stars. The included studies were categorized into four categories. Cross-sectional studies reporting the association between reliance on social media and vaccine intentions mainly observed a negative relationship. Studies that performed thematic analyses of extracted social media data, mainly observed a domination of vaccine hesitant topics. Studies that explored the degree of polarization of specific social media contents related to COVID-19 vaccines observed a similar degree of content for both positive and negative tone posted on different social media platforms. Finally, studies that explored the fluctuations of vaccination attitudes/opinions gathered from social media identified specific events as significant cofactors that affect and shape vaccination intentions of individuals. INTERPRETATION: This thorough examination of the various roles social media can play in disseminating information to the public, as well as how individuals behave on social media in the context of public health events, articulates the potential of social media as a platform of public health intervention to address vaccine hesitancy. FUNDING: None
Three-year COVID-19 and flu vaccinations among medical residents in a tertiary hospital in Italy: The threat of acceptance decline in seasonal campaigns
No full text: The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Italy started in December 2020, and, due to the Omicron variant's emergence, a second booster dose was recommended for high-risk individuals and healthcare workers from July 2022. The aim of the study was to evaluate the vaccination coverages for the COVID-19 second booster dose and to identify predictors of its acceptance within the population of medical residents (MRs) of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS (FPG) University Hospital. The study was conducted at FPG from October 4th to December 21st, 2022, and COVID-19 second booster dose and influenza vaccines were administered. The study analyzed collected data and conducted multivariate logistic regressions to explore potential predictors of vaccination adherence. The analyses performed were compared with the sample enrolled in FPG residency programs at the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. 1968 MRs were involved in the 2022-2023 vaccination campaign (mean age 28.97, SD 3.44), and the second booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination coverage was low (18.80%). Almost all participants opted for co-administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations, leading to a similar rate of influenza vaccination coverage (16.26%). Being a frontline resident, meaning a direct involvement in managing COVID-19 patients and vaccination campaigns, was the main predictor of vaccination adherence (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.25-2.17). The dropping in influenza vaccination coverage in 2022-2023 and the low adherence to COVID-19 second booster dose among young physicians is concerning, calling for tailored vaccination campaigns and interventions
- …
