1,721,191 research outputs found
Dataset used in the publication entitled "Origin of nucleation and growth of extension twins in grains unsuitably oriented for twinning during deformation of Mg-1%Al"
No full text<p>Documentation for the Dataset used in the publication entitled "Origin of nucleation and growth of extension twins in grains unsuitably oriented for twinning during deformation of Mg-1%Al"<br>** These datasets comprise the 2D data acquired in the Mg-1Al (at.%) alloy sample by means of in-situ EBSD, analyzed by MTEX 7.0 software. **<br>** The samples were deformed in tension and the test was periodically stopped to acquire the data. The in-situ EBSD data were acquired at tensile strains of 1.5%, 4.5%, 10.0%, and 15.3%.<br>** More details about the experimental techniques can be found in the publication "Biaobiao Yang, Javier Llorca, Origin of nucleation and growth of extension twins in grains unsuitably oriented for twinning during deformation of Mg-1%Al. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2024." **</p>
<p>1. Figs.1(B)_and_2_Grainsize_SF_Dataset.xlsx<br>- Description: The grain size and Schmid factors (SF) of various deformation modes acquired by in-situ EBSD before deformation<br>- Number of total grains: 4251 (rows == grains)<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 8 (columns == grain characteristics)</p>
<p>- Variable description by columns:<br> 1- (Grain_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: grain identifier, unique per analyzed zone<br> 2- (Grain_size) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the equivalent circle diameter of a grain<br> 3- (SF_Basal) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: it represents the highest Schmid factor of <a> basal slip in each grain<br> 4- (SF_Prismatic) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: it represents the highest Schmid factor of <a> prismatic slip in each grain<br> 5- (SF_ET) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: it represents the highest Schmid factor of extension twinning (ET) slip in each grain<br> 6- (SF_<a>Pyramidal) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: it represents the highest Schmid factor of <a> pyramidal slip in each grain<br> 7- (SF_<c+a>Pyramidal) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: it represents the highest Schmid factor of <c+a> pyramidal I slip in each grain<br> 8- (SF_CT) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: it represents the highest Schmid factor of compression twinning (CT) in each grain</p>
<p>2. Fig.3(A)_Stress-strain_curves.xlsx<br>- Description: The true tensile stress-true strain curve of Mg-1Al alloy deformed along the extrusion direction<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 2 </p>
<p>- Variable description by columns:<br> 1- (True_Strain) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: True strain during deformation<br> 2- (True_Stress) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: True stress reached corresponding to given true strain</p>
<p>3. Fig.3(B)_Strain_Hardening-Rate-strain_curves.xlsx<br>- Description: The strain hardening rate-true strain curve of Mg-1Al alloy deformed in tension along the extrusion direction<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 2 </p>
<p>- Variable description by columns:<br> 1- (True_Strain) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: True strain during deformation<br> 2- (Strain_Hardening-Rate) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: Strain hardening rate at the given true strain</p>
<p>4. Fig.5_Features_anormalous_extension_twins.xlsx<br>- Description: Both twin and grain data were acquired by in-situ EBSD before and after deformation<br>- Number of total twins: 353 (rows == twins) in four sheets corresponding to four strains: 1.5%, 4.5%, 10.0%, and 15.3%.<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 6 (columns == twin characteristics)</p>
<p>- Variable description by columns:<br> 1- (Twin_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: twin identifier, unique per analyzed zone<br> 2- (Aspect ratio of twin) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the length / width ratio of twin. More details can be found on the MTEX website (https://mtex-toolbox.github.io/grain2d.aspectRatio.html) <br> 3- (Twinned area fraction) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: it represents the area fraction of one twin in the corresponding parent grain. The value of 1 indicates that the full parent grain is occupied by this twin<br> 4- (Twinning Schmid factor) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the twinning Schmid factor based on the loading condition, orientation of the parent grain and twinning variants information<br> 5- (Twin variants) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the active twin variant was identified by means of conventional twinning analysis based on the orientations of twin and corresponding parent grain<br> 1: (ET1) (-1 0 1 2)[1 0 -1 1]<br> 2: (ET2) (1 0 -1 2)[-1 0 1 1]<br> 3: (ET3) (1 -1 0 2)[-1 1 0 1]<br> 4: (ET4) (-1 1 0 2)[1 -1 0 1]<br> 5: (ET5) (0 1 -1 2)[0 -1 1 1]<br> 6: (ET6) (0 -1 1 2)[0 1 -1 1]<br> 6- (Twin variant Schmid factor ranking) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the twinning Schmid factor ranking of active twin variant among 6 possible twin variants; the Schmid factor decreased from 1 to 6<br> 1: 1st (the highest Schmid factor for extension twinning)<br> 2: 2nd<br> 3: 3rd<br> 4: 4th<br> 5: 5th<br> 6: 6th (the lowest Schmid factor for extension twinning)</p>
<p>5. Fig.8(A)_Twin_twin_m_prime.xlsx<br>- Description: Both twin and grain data were acquired by in-situ EBSD before and after deformation up to 10.0%<br>- Number of twin-twin pairs: 17 (rows)<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 12 (columns)</p>
<p>- Variable description by columns: <br> 1- (Twin1_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the ID of the incoming twin of one twin-twin pair. Note that for one twin-twin pair, the twin with a higher macroscopic twinning Schmid factor is considered to be the incoming one<br> 2- (Grain1_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the ID of parent grain nucleating the incoming twin<br> 3- (Twin1_SF) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the twinning Schmid factor of incoming twin based on the loading condition, orientation of parent grain and twinning variants information<br> 4- (Twin1_variant) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the active twin variant was identified by means of conventional twinning analysis based on the orientations of the twin and corresponding parent grain<br> 1: (ET1) (-1 0 1 2)[1 0 -1 1]<br> 2: (ET2) (1 0 -1 2)[-1 0 1 1]<br> 3: (ET3) (1 -1 0 2)[-1 1 0 1]<br> 4: (ET4) (-1 1 0 2)[1 -1 0 1]<br> 5: (ET5) (0 1 -1 2)[0 -1 1 1]<br> 6: (ET6) (0 -1 1 2)[0 1 -1 1]<br> 5- (Twin2_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the ID of outgoing twin of one twin-twin pair<br> 6- (Grain2_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the ID of parent grain nucleating the outgoing twin<br> 7- (Twin2_SF) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the twinning Schmid factor of the outgoing twin<br> 8- (Twin2_variant) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the ranking of active outgoing twin systems with the same definition as column 4<br> 9- (Theoretical m prime) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the m prime values between the grain with the incoming twin variant and 6 possible twin variants in grain having the outgoing twin <br> 10- (GB misorientation angle) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the grain boundary misorientation (i.e., disorientation angle) angle between grains activating incoming and outgoing twins. The unit is degree<br> 11- (True m prime) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the m prime values between the grain with the incoming twin variant and the grain with the outgoing twin variant<br> 12- (m prime ranking_Active twin) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the m prime ranking of active twin among 6 values of theoretical m primes<br> 1: 1st (the highest m prime)<br> 2: 2nd<br> 3: 3rd<br> 4: 4th<br> 5: 5th<br> 6: 6th (the lowest m prime)</p>
<p>6. Fig.8(B)_Slip_twin_m_prime.xlsx<br>- Description: Both twin and grain data were acquired by in-situ EBSD before and after deformation up to 10.0%. The active slip system was identified by slip traces - modified lattice rotation (ST-MLRA). <br>- Number of slip-twin pairs: 84 (rows)<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 8 (columns)</p>
<p>- Variable description by columns: <br> 1- (Parent grain_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the ID of parent grain nucleating the extension twin <br> 2- (Twin SF) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the twinning Schmid factor of the active twin. Note that several extension twins may exist in one grain, so there are several instances of the same grain ID but different twins in the database<br> 3- (Twin variant) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the active twin variant was identified by means of conventional twinning analysis based on the orientations of the twin and corresponding parent grain<br> 1: (ET1) (-1 0 1 2)[1 0 -1 1]<br> 2: (ET2) (1 0 -1 2)[-1 0 1 1]<br> 3: (ET3) (1 -1 0 2)[-1 1 0 1]<br> 4: (ET4) (-1 1 0 2)[1 -1 0 1]<br> 5: (ET5) (0 1 -1 2)[0 -1 1 1]<br> 6: (ET6) (0 -1 1 2)[0 1 -1 1]<br> 4- (Neighboring grain_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the ID of neighboring grain near the appeared extension twin <br> 5- (SF_basal) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the Schmid factor of active <a> basal slip system identified by ST-MLRA for the neighboring grain<br> 6- (Active_Basal slip) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the active <a> basal slip system identified by ST-MLRA for the neighboring grain<br> 1: (S1) (0 0 0 1)[-2 1 1 0]<br> 2: (S2) (0 0 0 1)[1 1 -2 0]<br> 3: (S3) (0 0 0 1)[1 -2 1 0]<br> 7- (Theoretical m prime) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the m prime values between the neighboring grain with the active <a> basal slip system and 6 possible twin variants in grain having the active twin <br> 8- (True m prime) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the m prime values between the neighboring grain with the active <a> basal slip system and the grain with the active twin variant</p>
<p>7. Figs.8(C-D)_Correlation_twin_grainArea_basalSlipSF.xlsx<br>- Description: Summary of grain size, max. basal slip Schmid factor for all 555 grains before deformation, as well as the IDs of twinned grains after 1.5% and 10.0% tension<br>- Number of grains: 555 (rows) for all grains<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 5 (columns)</p>
<p>- Variable description by columns: <br> 1- (Grain_ID) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the IDs of all grains before deformation <br> 2- (Grain_size) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the equivalent circle diameter of all the grains before deformation <br> 3- (Max. Basal slip SF) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: the maximum of <a> basal slip Schmid factor for all the grains before deformation<br> 4- (Grain_ID_1.5%) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the IDs of all twinned grains after deformation up to 1.5%<br> 5- (Grain_ID_10.0%) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: the IDs of all twinned grains after deformation up to 10.0% </p>
<p>8. Fig.11(A)_Grain_level_misorientation_angle.xlsx<br>- Description: misorientation angles of several grains subjected to different strains </p>
<p>9. Fig.11(B)_Grain_level_longitudinal_strain.xlsx<br>- Description: Lengths as well as longitudinal strains of several grains subjected to different strains </p>
<p>10. Fig.14_Raw_grain_length_and_Longitudinal_strain.xlsx<br>- Description: Raw data regarding the characteristics of twinned grains at various strain levels. <br> The grain size shown here is defined as the equivalent circle diameter. <br> And the grain length along the tensile direction is defined by the product of pixel number of one grain and the step size (0.5 μm). <br> Note that for some unfortunate grains, their spatial locations are near the edge of EBSD before or after deformation, thus their size characteristics are unknown. <br> One additional untwined grain G132 shown in Fig. 9 was also included in this table. <br>- Number of grains: 72 (rows) for all twinned grains; 67 grains after removing the twinned grains near the EBSD edge<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 12 (columns)</p>
<p>- Variable description by columns:<br> 1- (Twinned grains ID) - type: G (grain) + numerical (integer)<br> Description: The IDs of all twinned grains before deformation <br> 2- (Near edge?) - type: text (str)<br> Description: Yes: grain near the edge; No: grain not near the edge<br> 3- (Grain size (μm)) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The equivalent circle diameter (in micrometers) of the grain before deformation<br> 4-8- Raw grain length along the tension direction (μm)) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: Raw grain lengths along the tension direction (μm) before deformation and at various macroscopic strain levels<br> 9-12- (Logitutational strain) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: Logitutational strain along the tension direction after deformed to various strain levels</p>
<p>11. Raw EBSD files in .ctf<br>- Description: 0-4 refer to 0%, 1.5%, 4.5%, 10.0% and 15.3%, respectively. </p>
Dataset used in the publication entitled "Application of machine learning to assess the influence of microstructure on twin nucleation in Mg alloys"
No full text<p>Documentation for the Dataset used in the publication entitled "Application of machine learning to assess the influence of microstructure on twin nucleation in Mg alloys" <br>** These datasets comprise the 2D EBSD data acquired in the Mg-1Al (at.%) alloy and AZ31 Mg alloy, analyzed with MTEX 7.0 software. **<br>** More details about the experimental techniques can be found in the publication "Biaobiao Yang, Valentin Vassilev-Galindo, Javier Llorca, Application of machine learning to assess the influence of microstructure on twin nucleation in Mg alloys. npj Computational Materials, 2024." **</p>
<p>1. AZ31_ML.xlsx<br>- Description: Both twin and grain data were acquired by EBSD from AZ31 Mg sample before and after deformation at the same area<br>- Number of grains: 2640 (rows == grains) corresponding to three samples deformed in different orientations: S0, S45, and S90<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 31 (columns == grain characteristics)</p>
<p>- Variable description by columns:<br> 1- (Twinned) - type: boolean<br> Description: Indicates if the grain twinned or not after deformation<br> 0: non-twinned grain<br> 1: twinned grain<br> 2- (Orientation) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: The loading (tensile) direction with respect to the c axis of lattice<br> 3- (Strain_level) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The maximum strain level after deformation <br> 4- (Grain_size) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The equivalent circle diameter (in micrometers) of the grain before deformation.<br> 5- (Triple_points) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: The number of triple points of the grain before deformation <br> 6- (Near_edge) - type: boolean<br> Description: Indicates if the grain is located near the edge of the 2D EBSD or not. This feature was used to filter out from the final dataset the grains near the edge of the sample. Hence, only those entries with Near_edge value of 0 were used to train and test the machine learning models. <br> 0: not near the EBSD edge<br> 1: near the EBSD edge<br> 7-12- (T_SF*) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The twinning Schmid factor based on the loading condition, orientation of parent grain and twin variants information.<br> T_SF1: The highest Schmid factor of extension twinning<br> T_SF2: The 2nd highest ... <br> T_SF3: 3rd<br> T_SF4: 4th<br> T_SF5: 5th<br> T_SF6: The lowest Schmid factor of extension twinning<br> 13-15- (S_SF*) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The Schmid factor for <a> basal slip based on the loading condition, orientation of parent grain, and slip system information. Only the <a> basal slip system is considered because it is the dominant deformation slip system in Mg during deformation.<br> S_SF1: The highest Schmid factor of <a> basal slip<br> S_SF2: The second highest or the middle Schmid factor of <a> basal slip <br> S_SF3: The lowest Schmid factor of <a> basal slip<br> 16- (Neighbor_grain_n) - type: numerical (integer)<br> Description: The number of neighbors of the grain before deformation. <br> 17-19- (B-b_m) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The Luster-Morris geometric compatibility factor (m') between the <a> basal slip systems of the grain and its neighbors. Although there are 3 possible <a> basal slip systems, only the one with the highest Schmid factor was considered to compute m′. Only maximum, minimum, and mean values were included in the dataset.<br> (Max_B-b_m): The highest basal - basal m' between the grain and its neighbors <br> (Min_B-b_m): The lowest basal - basal m' between the grain and its neighbors <br> (Mean_B-b_m): The average basal - basal m' between the grain and its neighbors<br> 20-22- (B-t_m) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The Luster-Morris geometric compatibility factor (m') between the 6 extension twin variants of the grain and the <a> basal slip systems of its neighbors. Although there are 3 possible <a> basal slip systems, only the one with the highest Schmid factor was considered to compute m'. However, all 6 twinning variants have been considered, given that slip induced twinning is a localized process. Only maximum, minimum, and mean values were included in the dataset.<br> (Max_B-t_m): The highest basal - twin m' between the grain and its neighbors <br> (Min_B-t_m): The lowest basal - twin m' between the grain and its neighbors<br> (Mean_B-t_m): The average basal - twin m' between the grain and its neighbors<br> 23-25- (GB_misang) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The misorientation angle (in º) between the grain and its neighbors. In fact, disorientation angle is used for the misorientation angle. Only maximum, minimum, and mean values were included in the dataset.<br> (Max_GBmisang): The highest GB misorientation angle between the grain and its neighbors <br> (Min_GBmisang): The lowest GB misorientation angle between the grain and its neighbors<br> (Mean_GBmisang): The average GB misorientation angle between the grain and its neighbors<br> 26-28- (delta_Gs) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: Grain size difference (in micrometers) between a given grain and its neighbors. The grain size is calculated as the diameter of a circular grain with the same area of the grain. Only maximum, minimum, and mean values were included in the dataset.<br> (Max_deltaGs): The highest grain size difference between the grain and its neighbors<br> (Min_deltaGs): The smallest grain size difference between the grain and its neighbors<br> (Mean_deltaGs): The average grain size difference between the grain and its neighbors<br> 29-31- (delta_BSF) - type: numerical (float)<br> Description: The difference in the <a> basal slip Schmid factor between a given grain and its neighbors. Only the highest <a> basal slip Schmid factor is considered. Only maximum, minimum, and mean values were included in the dataset.<br> (Max_deltaBSF): The highest basal SF difference between the grain and its neighbors<br> (Min_deltaBSF): The smallest basal SF difference between the grain and its neighbors <br> (Mean_deltaBSF): The average basal SF difference between the grain and its neighbors</p>
<p>2. Mg1Al_ML.xlsx<br>- Description: Both twin and grain data were acquired by EBSD from Mg-1Al (at.%) sample before and after deformation at the same area<br>- Number of grains: 1496 (rows == grains) corresponding to two true strain levels: ~6%, and ~10%.<br>- Number of analyzed variables (features): 31 (columns == grain characteristics)</p>
<p>- Variable descriptions by columns are the same as those of AZ31_ML.xlsx</p>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Collagen-based 3D printed poly (glycerol sebacate) composite scaffold with biomimicking mechanical properties for enhanced cartilage defect repair
No full textCartilage defect repair with optimal efficiency remains a significant challenge due to the limited self-repair capability of native tissues. The development of bioactive scaffolds with biomimicking mechanical properties and degradation rates matched with cartilage regeneration while simultaneously driving chondrogenesis, plays a crucial role in enhancing cartilage defect repair. To this end, a novel composite scaffold with hierarchical porosity was manufactured by incorporating a pro-chondrogenic collagen type I/II-hyaluronic acid (CI/II-HyA) matrix to a 3D-printed poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS) framework. Based on the mechanical enforcement of PGS framework, the composite scaffold exhibited a compressive modulus of 167.0 kPa, similar to that of native cartilage, as well as excellent fatigue resistance, similar to that of native joint tissue. In vitro degradation tests demonstrated that the composite scaffold maintained structural, mass, and mechanical stability during the initial cartilage regeneration period of 4 weeks, while degraded linearly over time. In vitro biological tests with rat-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) revealed that, the composite scaffold displayed increased cell loading efficiency and improved overall cell viability due to the incorporation of CI/II-HyA matrix. Additionally, it also sustained an effective and high-quality MSC chondrogenesis and abundant de-novo cartilage-like matrix deposition up to day 28. Overall, the biomimetic composite scaffold with sufficient mechanical support, matched degradation rate with cartilage regeneration, and effective chondrogenesis stimulation shows great potential to be an ideal candidate for enhancing cartilage defect repair
Novel experimental procedure and determination of full displacement fields of delaminating composite layer interfaces for evaluation of the mode II cohesive law
Full text linkA novel mode II fracture test setup based on a simple tensile loading scenario with a discontinuous ply specimen is proposed in the paper as the first step towards determination of the cohesive law of composite layer interfaces. Key outputs of the procedure are the full displacement fields obtained by correlation of high resolution SEM images taken during in-situ tensile tests. Analysis of the full displacement fields at subsequent stress levels allow for unique analysis of the damage zone and direct determination of the displacement jumps across the interface. The next phase of the work is the evaluation of the shear stresses at the interface necessary to determine the cohesive law
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
