255 research outputs found
sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302221094432 – Supplemental material for When “good guys” do bad things: Evaluations of sexual harassment allegations against male allies
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302221094432 for When “good guys” do bad things: Evaluations of sexual harassment allegations against male allies by Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Anna Klas and Edward J. R. Clarke in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations</p
Supplemental Material, sj-docx-1-spp-10.1177_19485506211037296 - Failure Leads Protest Movements to Support More Radical Tactics
No full textSupplemental Material, sj-docx-1-spp-10.1177_19485506211037296 for Failure Leads Protest Movements to Support More Radical Tactics by Winnifred R. Louis, Morgana Lizzio-Wilson, Mikaela Cibich, Craig McGarty, Emma F. Thomas, Catherine E. Amiot, Nathan Weber, Joshua Rhee, Grace Davies, Timothy Rach, Syasya Goh, Zoe McMaster, Orla Muldoon, Naoimh Howe and Fathali Moghaddam in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p
Supplementary materials to: Partisan bias in responses to sexual misconduct allegations against male politicians
No full textSupplementary materials to: Clarke, E. J. R., Klas, A., Lizzio-Wilson, M., & Kothe, E. J. (2022). Partisan bias in responses to sexual misconduct allegations against male politicians. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 706–722. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6371The Supplementary Materials contain the following items: All explanations of the deviations from pre-registrations of Studies 1 and 2. The Perceived Legitimacy scale items, with information pertaining to the validity of the scale. There is the screening items and manipulation checks, as well as all stimulus materials, used in both experiments. Extra analyses for both studies. In Study 1, we document the same analysis as in the manuscript, except with gender included as a covariate, as well as the original analysis with participants excluded due to failed manipulation checks included. We also conducted the same extra analyses for Study 2, and have incorpated these into the Supplementary Materials document
MORGANA DESPIERTA NUESTRA CONCIENCIA
No full textThe Galician writer Begoña Caamaño in her book Morgana en Esmelle analyzes the theme of sorority, a term not yet accepted by the Real Academia Española, or female twinning or solidarity among women. Through her female character, punished for almost all of the history, the author seeks the change we should make in order to finished with the patriarchal system and give way to brotherhood among men and women. We can find the feeling of guilt in all the characters, so that repentance, punishment and remorse accompany them during their journey of initiation. The voice of the author is simultaneously a pessimistic and encouraging voice that Morgana uses to point out the social traditionalism anchored in some old and obsolete archetypes.La escritora gallega Begoña Caamaño en su libro Morgana en Esmelle analiza el tema de la sororidad, un término aún no aceptado por la Real Academia Española, o hermanamiento femenino o de solidaridad entre mujeres. A través de este personaje femenino tan castigado durante casi toda su historia, busca el cambio que debemos realizar para conseguir que el sistema patriarcal acabe sus días y dé paso a la hermandad entre hombres y mujeres. Asimismo, planea por la obra un sentimiento de culpabilidad en todos los personajes, de tal manera que el arrepentimiento, el castigo y el remordimiento los acompañan durante su viaje de iniciación. Cabe agregar la voz de la autora, una voz pesimista y alentadora simultáneamente, que se sirve de Morgana para señalar el costumbrismo social anclado en unos arquetipos antiguos y obsoletos.AbstractThe Galician writer Begoña Caamaño in her book Morgana en Esmelle analyzes the theme of sorority, a term not yet accepted by the Real Academia Española, or female twinning or solidarity among women. Through her female character, punished for almost all of the history, the author seeks the change we should make in order to finished with the patriarchal system and give way to brotherhood among men and women. We can find the feeling of guilt in all the characters, so that repentance, punishment and remorse accompany them during their journey of initiation. The voice of the author is simultaneously a pessimistic and encouraging voice that Morgana uses to point out the social traditionalism anchored in some old and obsolete archetypes
Morgana Wakes Up Our Consciousness
No full textLa escritora gallega Begoña Caamaño en su libro Morgana en Esmelle analiza el tema de la sororidad, un término aún no aceptado por la Real Academia Española, o hermanamiento femenino o de solidaridad entre mujeres. A través de este personaje femenino tan castigado durante casi toda su historia, busca el cambio que debemos realizar para conseguir que el sistema patriarcal acabe sus días y dé paso a la hermandad entre hombres y mujeres. Asimismo, plantea por la obra un sentimiento de culpabilidad en todos los personajes, de tal manera que el arrepentimiento, el castigo y el remordimiento los acompañan durante su viaje de iniciación. Cabe agregar la voz de la autora, una voz pesimista y alentadora simultáneamente, que se sirve de Morgana para señalar el costumbrismo social anclado en unos arquetipos antiguos y obsoletosThe Galician writer Begoña Caamaño in her book Morgana en Esmelle analyzes the theme of sorority, a term not yet accepted by the Real Academia Española, or female twinning or solidarity among women. Through her female character, punished for almost all of the history, the author seeks the change we should make in order to finished with the patriarchal system and give way to brotherhood among men and women. We can find the feeling of guilt in all the characters, so that repetance, punishment and remorse accompany them during their journey of initation. The voice that Morgana uses to point out the social traditionalism anchored in some old and obsolete archetype
What Type of Ally Are You? Using Latent Profile Analysis to Identify Multiple Motivations for Allyship
No full textThe present research adopts a person-centred approach (Latent Profile Analysis; LPA) to identify meaningful subgroups of advantaged group allies across three social issues (gender equality, racial equality, equality for sexual and gender minorities). As advantaged group’s motivations underpinning are likely to be heterogeneous (and therefore not characteristic of a whole population of actors), LPA can be used to identify subgroups of allies who respond similarly in terms of their motivations but are responding differently to other subgroups. We will test for these subgroups across different issues to assess motivations for allyship which are relatively stable or different across intergroup contexts. We will also examine whether these subgroups report action tendencies (in terms of both frequency of type(s) of actions taken) and the factors that might explain their subgroup membership
Examining Veterinarians' Attitudes Toward Animal Euthanasia Using Latent Profile Analysis
No full textWe will using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to identify empirically distinct reactions to animal euthanasia among veterinarians
Thank goodness I’ve got you: group membership as a buffer to the experience of rejection
No full textPeople respond to rejection with a complex range of motives and behaviours. In particular, the experience of rejection can produce shifts in mood and elicit hostility and aggression, and increased antisocial behaviour. Establishing effective means of moderating the effects of rejection will contribute to both public health and interpersonal conflict resolution. Consistent with research that conceptualises rejection as a threat to belonging, the present study employed an experimental design to examine the buffering effect of people’s group memberships on their reactions to rejection. It was hypothesized that as a greater number of group memberships were made salient, the negative effects of rejection would correspondingly decrease, and the positive effects would increase. Participants were randomly allocated to one of four group memberships conditions, in which either zero (N=27), one (N=28), three (N=26) or five (N=26) social category group memberships were made salient utilizing a free-response task, which involved participants writing about ‘why each group was important to them’. An experience of rejection was then created by falsely informing participants that they weren’t sufficiently liked by others in the experiment to be chosen to work collaboratively on a task. Participants then completed self-report measures of mood and group identification, an attribution perception task and behavioural measures of aggression and executive functioning. Results indicate that when a greater number of group memberships were made salient, participants demonstrated increased loyalty, decreased hostile attributions and decreased aggressive responding toward the source of the rejection. Findings are interpreted as evidence for the buffering effect of cognitive representations of social category group memberships on the experience of rejection. Applications for the mitigation of the effects of bullying and the de-escalation of conflict are proposed
Why can’t we all just get along? A social psychological examination of women’s intra-gender hostility
No full textExamining Health Practitioners' Attitudes Toward Voluntary Assisted Dying Using Latent Profile Analysis
No full textWe will using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to identify empirically distinct reactions to voluntary assisted dying among health practitioners
- …
