1,720,961 research outputs found
Breast density characterization through convolutional neural networks and first order statistical features
No full textConvolutional neural networks for breast density classification: Performance and explanation insights
No full textWe propose and evaluate a procedure for the explainability of a breast density deep learning based classifier. A total of 1662 mammography exams labeled according to the BI-RADS categories of breast density was used. We built a residual Convolutional Neural Network, trained it and studied the responses of the model to input changes, such as different distributions of class labels in training and test sets and suitable image pre-processing. The aim was to identify the steps of the analysis with a relevant impact on the classifier performance and on the model explainability. We used the grad-CAM algorithm for CNN to produce saliency maps and computed the Spearman’s rank correlation between input images and saliency maps as a measure of explanation accuracy. We found that pre-processing is critical not only for accuracy, precision and recall of a model but also to have a reasonable explanation of the model itself. Our CNN reaches good performances compared to the state-of-art and it considers the dense pattern to make the classification. Saliency maps strongly correlate with the dense pattern. This work is a starting point towards the implementation of a standard framework to evaluate both CNN performances and the explainability of their predictions in medical image classification problems
Residual convolutional neural networks to automatically extract significant breast density features
No full textIn this paper, we present a work on breast density classification performed with deep residual neural network and we discuss the future analysis we could perform. Breast density is one of the most important breast cancer risk factor and it represents the amount of fibroglandular tissue with respect to fat tissue as seen on a mammographic exam. However, it is not easy to include it in risk models because of its variability among women and its qualitative definition. We trained a deep CNN to perform breast density classification in two ways. First, we classified mammograms using two “super-classes” that are dense and non-dense breast. Second, we trained the residual neural network to classify mammograms according to the four classes of the BI-RADS standard. We obtained very good results compared to our literature knowledge in terms of accuracy and recall. In the near future, we are going to improve the robustness of our algorithm with respect to the mammographic systems used and we want to include pathological exams too. Then we want to study and characterize the CNN-extracted features in order to identify the most significant for breast density. Finally, we want to study how to quantitatively measure the precision of the network in capturing the significative part of the images
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
