323,080 research outputs found
David R. Lankes: Expeditions: Books on the Side
Expeditions: Books on the Side from R. David Lankes on Vimeo. David R. Lankes lädt derzeit kontinuierlich Videos hoch, s. die Kontextvorschläge auf Vimeo! Das ist übrigens auch der 300. Eintrag auf bibvideo
Eva-Maria Lankes (Hrsg.): Pädagogische Professionalität als Gegenstand empirischer Forschung. Münster: Waxmann 2008 (324 S.) [Annotation]
Annotation zu: Eva-Maria Lankes (Hrsg.): Pädagogische Professionalität als Gegenstand empirischer Forschung. Münster: Waxmann 2008 (324 S.; ISBN 978-3-8309-2034-2; 29,90 EUR)
PUBLICATION TYPE: Journal DATE: 2003 FINAL CITATION: “Digital Reference Triage: An Investigation using the Delphi Method into the Factors Influencing Question Routing and Assignment. ” Pomerantz, J.,
Pomerantz, J., Nicholson, S., & Lankes, R. D. Digital reference triage: An in... Delphi method into the factors influencing question routing and assignment
The contribution of lankes new librarianship to knowledge decolonialization
Abstract: This work presents the contribution of the perspective conceived by R. David Lankes with the publication of the Atlas of the New Librarianship, in 2011 - the New Librarianship -, to decolonialize knowledge. The construction of this work had as a principle for analysis the mission of the librarian, which is the basis of the New Librarianship,’s perpective, the presentation and conceptualization of this concept and coloniality and decoloniality concepts. Lankes' New Librarianship brings reflection on the importance of empowering communities through the creation of knowledge and positions the librarian as an active subject in the participation of this collective construction. Thus, the perspective contributes to the decoloniality of knowledge by positioning the community as the true informational input beyond the boundaries of the book as an informational record of knowledge. Knowledge is found in every member of the community and it is the librarian's role to give voice to that knowledge.
Keywords: Knowledge construction; David Lankes; Decoloniality; New Librarianship.Resumo: O presente trabalho apresenta a contribuição da perspectiva concebida por R. David Lankes com a publicação do Atlas of the New Librarianship, em 2011 - a Nova Biblioteconomia -, para decolonializar o conhecimento. A construção deste trabalho teve como princípio para análise a missão do bibliotecário, que é a base da perspectiva da Nova Biblioteconomia, a apresentação e conceituação deste conceito e os conceitos de colonialidade e decolonialidade. A Nova Biblioteconomia de Lankes traz a reflexão acerca da importância de empoderar as comunidades por meio da criação do conhecimento e posiciona o bibliotecário como sujeito ativo na participação desta construção coletiva. Assim, a perspectiva contribui com a decolonialidade do conhecimento ao posicionar a comunidade como o verdadeiro insumo informacional além das fronteiras do livro como registro informacional do conhecimento. O conhecimento se encontra em cada membro da comunidade e é papel do bibliotecário dar voz a esse conhecimento.
Palavras-chave: Construção do conhecimento; David Lankes; Decolonialidade; Nova Biblioteconomia
Recommended from our members
Expect More: Demanding Better Libraries for Today's Complex World
More information about Expect More, including chapter explanations, can be found at https://davidlankes.org/new-librarianship/expect-more-demanding-better-libraries-for-todays-complex-world/Libraries have existed for millennia, but today many question their necessity. In an ever more digital and connected world do we still need places of books in our towns, colleges, or schools? If libraries aren’t about books, what are they about? In Expect More, David Lankes, winner of the 2012 ABC-CLIO/Greenwood Award for the Best Book in Library Literature, walks you through what to expect out of your library. Lankes argues that communities need libraries that go beyond bricks and mortar and beyond books. We need to expect more out of our libraries. They should be places of learning and advocates for our communities in terms of learning, privacy, intellectual property, and economic development. Expect More is a rallying call to communities to raise the bar, and their expectations, for great libraries.Informatio
Bos, Wilfried, Lankes, Eva-Maria, Plaßmeier, Nike & Schwippert, Knut (Hrsg.). (2004). Heterogenität. Eine Herausforderung an die empirische Bildungsforschung. Münster: Waxmann, 320 S., 24,90 €. [Rezension]
Rezension zu: Bos, Wilfried, Lankes, Eva-Maria, Plaßmeier, Nike & Schwippert, Knut (Hrsg.). (2004). Heterogenität. Eine Herausforderung an die empirische Bildungsforschung
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
This study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
