1,720,971 research outputs found
In secundum et quartum Sententiarum / Landulfus Caracciolus. In tertium Sententiarum / Franciscus de Mayronis (Ms.1746)
Manuscrito número 1746 de la Biblioteca Histórica de la USAL2 hojas guarda papel, 172 hojas, 2 hojas guarda papel : pergamino ; 345 x 230 mmAutores y títulos deducidos de los colofones de cada una de las piezasColación: 8(12)+2+14+4(12)+10+2 hojas independientes. -- Reclamos de cuaderno, restos de signaturas -- Foliación moderna: En bl. f. 98Caja de escritura: 252 x 167 mm, 2 columnas, 63 líneasEscritura: Letra gótica librariaDecoración: Iniciales alternando en rojo y azul con dibujos de rasgueo; las de libro, de mayor tamaño, con entrelazos y festón que se extiende por toda la columna; calderones en rojo y azul; cabeceras en rojo y azul que indican libro y distinctio.Procede del Colegio de San Bartoloméf. 1ra-97va: Landulfus Caracciolus, In secundum Sententiarum ---
f. 99ra-112vb: Franciscus de Mayronis, In tertium Sententiarum ---
f. 113ra-170vb: Landulfus Caracciolus, In quartum Sententiaru
2910. Landulfus de Columna, chanoine de Chartres
2910. Landulfus de Columna, chanoine de Chartres. In: Molinier Auguste. Les Sources de l'histoire de France - Des origines aux guerres d'Italie (1494). III. Les Capétiens, 1180-1328. Paris : A. Picard et fils, 1903. pp. 208-209
[Halle (Saale), Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt, Morbio 1 (32)]
Johannes, presbyter ordinarius der Kirche St. Michaelis Archangeli, belehnt Adamus, Verwalter des Hospitals, das die Hälfte der Kirche einnimmt, mit ebendieser Hälfte der Kirche, wie es bereits durch den verstorbenen Priester Arialdus gehalten und per Dekret des Landulfus, Bischof von Cremona, festgelegt worden warHandschrift DE-3, GND 2024680-8, Signatur: Morbio 1 (32)Die Illustrationen sind: Notarszeichen, HandzeichenÜberlieferungsart: kopial (Mitte 12. Jh.)Beschreibstoff: PergamentErhaltungszustand: gutHandschriftUrkund
[Halle (Saale), Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt, Morbio 9 (19)]
Gizus, genannt Burrus, und weitere consules sprechen ein Urteil im Streitfall zwischen dem presbyter Landulfus, rector der Kirche St. Babilae extra portam Orientalem in Mailand, und dem Rechtskundigen Otto, genannt Alchindus, um Land an einem Ort genannt ad Valariam, nicht weit von der Stadt.Handschrift DE-3, GND 2024680-8, Signatur: Morbio 9 (19)Die Illustrationen sind: NotarszeichenÜberlieferungsart: interpolierte imitierende Kopie / Fälschung, 17. Jh.Beschreibstoff: PergamentErhaltungszustand: gutHandschriftUrkund
[Halle (Saale), Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt, Morbio 8 (1)]
Landulfus, Bischof von Cremona, entspricht der Bitte des Benedictus, archipresbyter [der Kathedrale von Cremona], zwei Priester in der Kirche St. Michaelis einsetzen zu dürfen.Handschrift DE-3, GND 2024680-8, Signatur: Morbio 8 (1)Die Illustrationen sind: LabaraÜberlieferungsart: kopialBeschreibstoff: PergamentErhaltungszustand: moderatZur zeitlichen Einordnung der Urkunde vgl. CD Cattedrale Cremona, S. 35 zu Nr. 39.Sowohl der Schriftbefund als auch die Tatsache, dass alle Zeugenunterfertigungen wie aus einem Guss sind, legen eine abschriftliche Überlieferung nahe.HandschriftUrkund
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
