1,720,978 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Evaluation of the Effects of the Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Sacubitril/Valsartan Combined Therapy in Patients with HFrEF: An Echocardiographic Study
Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (iSGLT2) have become the fourth pillar of the medical treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the mechanisms of action of iSGLT2 remain poorly understood. The effectiveness of combined ARNI and iSGLT2 therapy in left ventricular (LV) remodeling is still under study. We aim to investigate the effects of ARNI + iSGLT2 combination therapy in patients affected by HFrEF in terms of ventricular remodeling using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). In this observational study, 136 patients with HFrEF taking ARNI were enrolled. All patients were evaluated at baseline (before iSGLT2), at 3 months and at 12 months from the beginning of iSGLT2 therapy. Echocardiographic parameters, including STE analysis and volumetric and LV contractile function indices, were collected at the three timepoints. The objectives were (1) to evaluate the effects of ARNI + iSGLT2 combination therapy on ultrasound (US) measurements; (2) to evaluate the effects on the variation of laboratory data indicative of HF (NT-pro-BNP); and (3) to evaluate the medium-long term impact of the ARNI + iSGLT2 combination therapy in terms of major cardiovascular events (MACVE). After only three months of combined ARNI + iSGLT2 therapy, we reported a significant improvement in ventricular and atrial volumetric indices, systolic function indices and myocardial deformation parameters assessed by STE. We also reported a significant decrease in NTproBNP levels. This trend was confirmed at 12 months follow-up. Furthermore, narrowing down the analysis to patients who were already treated with ARNI when they started taking iSGLT2, we reported similar results in the improvement of US parameters and NTproBNP levels. Our study has shown that the ARNI + iSGLT2 combination therapy leads to a clinical improvement and positive ventricular remodeling. Even the single introduction of additional iSGLT-2 in HFrEF patients on an otherwise optimized therapy resulted in a significant improvement in US and laboratory variables. The results of our study suggest implementing iSGLT-2 therapy as soon as possible, as the structural and functional cardiac improvements achieved by these drugs are achieved in the short term and maintained in the long term
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Stratified treatment of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: the PROMISE trial
Background and aims: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is associated with a significant risk of mortality, rehospitalisation, and angina burden. Despite its clinical impact, no randomized clinical trials have hitherto evaluated optimal management strategy for MINOCA. The PROMISE trial was designed to assess whether a stratified treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with MINOCA as compared to standard care. Methods: PROMISE is a multicentre randomised trial. Patients with MINOCA were randomised 1:1 to either a stratified treatment based on a comprehensive diagnostic workup aimed at identifying the underlying aetiology, or to standard care. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in the change in angina status at 12 months, assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score (SAQSS). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization and repeated coronary angiography. The trial was terminated early upon recommendation by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board due to clear benefits observed in the intervention group and potential harm in the control group. Results: Of 101 randomized patients, 92 were confirmed as MINOCA and included in the final analysis (mean age 62±13 years, 48% women; stratified treatment n=45; standard care n=47). At 12-month follow-up, SAQSS was significantly higher in the stratified treatment than in standard care group, with a mean between-group difference of +9.38 in favour of the stratified treatment (95% confidence interval 6.81 to 11.95; p<0.001). MACE occurred in 1 patient (2.2%) in the stratified treatment and in 4 patients (8.5%) in the standard care group, though the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.18). Conclusions: In this first randomized trial of treatment strategies in MINOCA, a stratified treatment, based on comprehensive diagnostic assessment and aetiology-guided therapy, led to a significant improvement in angina-related health status. While the study findings provide the first evidence supporting individualized management in this heterogeneous and often under-recognized patient population, these results require confirmation in a larger prospective study with longer follow-up
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
