101,927 research outputs found
D. G. Lipani (a cura di), “Alberto Naselli, Ferrara e la cultura dell’attore nel secondo ’500”, Roma, Aracne, 2021
No full textRecensione del volume "Alberto Naselli, Ferrara e la cultura dell’attore nel secondo ’500", curato da Giuseppe Domenico Lipani (2021), che contiene saggi di Simona Brunetti, Patrizia Castelli, Domenico Giuseppe Lipani, Fabio Mangolini, Teresa Megale, Sergio Monaldini, Daniele Seragnoli, Francesca Simoncini, Elena Tamburini e Anna Maria Testaverde
Fermentation characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates from Aglianico of Vulture in the Basilicata region of Southern Italy
No full textNote a margine da un'esperienza di campo: un incontro mediato
No full textIl volume offre un resconto delle manifestazioni liturgiche e paraliturgiche che connotano la Settimana Santa nella Valle d'Agrò (Sicilia). Il contributo si focalizza sulla questione dell'antropologia visuale, ossia sulle questioni metodologiche e di prassi della documenazione foto/videografica della ricerca antropologica
Bibliographie Hilarion G. Petzold 1958 – 2009 mit Anhang als Einführung
No full textDieses Archiv enthält die Gesamtbibliographie der Werke des Autors nebst einiger Texte „Über H. G. Petzold“ im Schlussteil der Bibliographie sowie einen Anhang mit einer Einführung in die Architektur des Werkes in seinem wissenslogischen Aufbau als Ausarbeitung seines „Tree of Science Modells“ (2007).This archive contains the complete bibliography of the author and some texts about H. G. Petzold, moreover an epilogue with an introduction to the architecture of the works in its epistemological structure and composition and as an elaborations of Petzold’s „Tree of Science Modell (2007).https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/01-2009-petzold-h-g-gesamtbibliographie-h-g-petzold-1958-2009-updating-november2009/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Evaluation metrics for measuring bias in search engine results
No full textSearch engines decide what we see for a given search query. Since many people are exposed to information through search engines, it is fair to expect that search engines are neutral. However, search engine results do not necessarily cover all the viewpoints of a search query topic, and they can be biased towards a specific view since search engine results are returned based on relevance, which is calculated using many features and sophisticated algorithms where search neutrality is not necessarily the focal point. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the search engine results with respect to bias. In this work we propose novel web search bias evaluation measures which take into account the rank and relevance. We also propose a framework to evaluate web search bias using the proposed measures and test our framework on two popular search engines based on 57 controversial query topics such as abortion, medical marijuana, and gay marriage. We measure the stance bias (in support or against), as well as the ideological bias (conservative or liberal). We observe that the stance does not necessarily correlate with the ideological leaning, e.g. a positive stance on abortion indicates a liberal leaning but a positive stance on Cuba embargo indicates a conservative leaning. Our experiments show that neither of the search engines suffers from stance bias. However, both search engines suffer from ideological bias, both favouring one ideological leaning to the other, which is more significant from the perspective of polarisation in our society
- …
