1,720,962 research outputs found
Color discrimination along the cardinal chromatic axes with VECPs as an index of function of the parvocellular pathway. Correspondence of intersubject and axis variations to psychophysics
Visual evoked cortical potentials and psychophysical determination of color contrast thresholds along different chromatic axes
Abstract. Color vision can be assessed by examining the color contrast threshold along various color axes. We investigated the possibility of determining these thresholds objectively by means of visual evoked cortical potentials. A color-calibrated flicker-free (112-Hz) monitor and a 14- bit-per-gun board allowed visualization of colors with specified xyY CIE 193l coordinates. Horizontal grating, 1 c/deg were sinusoidally alternated at 8 Hz for both visual evoked cortical potential recordings and psychophysical determinations. Two healthy emmetropic 35 year-old subjects performed color brightness matching along each color axis, before any recording and reduction in color contrast. For each color axis, extrapolation to zero voltage of the visual evoked cortical potential amplitude versus log color contrast response allowed determination of the color contrast threshold. The visual evoked cortical potential-derived threshold changed considerably with the color axis, with evident intersubject differences. These differences were similar to those observed in the psychophysically determined thresholds. Visual evoked cortical potential responses to suitable chromatic stimuli allow determination of color contrast thresholds that correspond well to those determined psychophysically. Hence, with the visual evoked cortical potential, accurate objective assessment of color vision is feasible and may be useful in both research and clinical settings
Visual acuity measured by pattern visual evoked potentials is unaffected by masking the foveolar region. Implications for the interpretation of visual acuity development in infants
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Confusion Points and Constant-luminance Planes for Trichromats, Protanopes and Deuteranopes
AbstractThe confusion points of dichromats are derived from the constant-luminance planes of trichromats, protanopes and deuteranopes experimentally defined by heterochromatic-flicker photometry: (1) the zero-luminance planes of the observers considered in this experiment intersect almost exactly in a line that crosses the plane of the chromaticity diagram in the tritanopic-confusion point and confirm that the short-wavelength sensitive cones can be considered to have no contribution to luminance; (2) protanopic- and deuteranopic-confusion points are taken as being defined by the intersection of the tangent line to the long-wavelength region of the spectrum locus and the zero-luminance plane for protanopes and deuteranopes, respectively. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
