2,213 research outputs found
EXPLORING THE GREAT DIVIDE. ANIMALS AND HUMANS IN THE GERMANLANGUAGE LITERATURE
No full textThe recent emergence of the discipline of literary animal studies regards literature in itself as constitutive element of a history of knowledge. The discipline has led not only to the expansion of the corpus of texts traditionally connected with animals, but also established new concepts and methods for revising conventional cultural dichotomies (subject and object, human and animal). The 10 essays collected in this volume are devoted to a wide range of case studies on the relationship between animality and poetics in German-speaking literature since the 18th century. They display a variety of theoretical and methodological approaches to a number of texts packed with references to animals, considered not primarily as objects of literature, but as agents endowed with an active role in the production of literature, and which have left repressed or forgotten traces in texts
Introduction. Exploring the Great Divide. Animals and Humans in the German-Language Literature
No full textThe recent emergence of the discipline of literary animal studies regards literature in itself as constitutive element of a history of knowledge. The discipline has led not only to the expansion of the corpus of texts traditionally connected with animals, but also established new concepts and methods for revising conventional cultural dichotomies (subject and object, human and animal). The 10 essays collected in this volume are devoted to a wide range of case studies on the relationship between animality and poetics in German-speaking literature since the 18th century. They display a variety of theoretical and methodological approaches to a number of texts packed with references to animals, considered not primarily as objects of literature, but as agents endowed with an active role in the production of literature, and which have left repressed or forgotten traces in texts
Recensione a Thomas Bernhard, Autobiografia, a cura di L. Reitani
No full textrecensione all'Autobiografia di Thomas Bernhard a cura di Luigi Reitan
Animals and Humans in German Literature, 1800-2000: Exploring the Great Divide
No full textThe recent emergence of the discipline of literary animal studies regards literature in itself as constitutive element of a history of knowledge. The discipline has led not only to the expansion of the corpus of texts traditionally connected with animals, but also established new concepts and methods for revising conventional cultural dichotomies (subject and object, human and animal). The 10 essays collected in this volume are devoted to a wide range of case studies on the relationship between animality and poetics in German-speaking literature since the 18th century. They display a variety of theoretical and methodological approaches to a number of texts packed with references to animals, considered not primarily as objects of literature, but as agents endowed with an active role in the production of literature, and which have left repressed or forgotten traces in texts
Recensione a Il biondo Eckbert (L. Tieck, a cura di L. Tofi, Marsilio), “Cultura tedesca”, 39 (2010);
No full textrecensione al testo Der blonde Eckbert di Tiec
Documenti latini
No full textDocumenti latini. - Firenze : E. Ariani, 1928
Dedica manoscritta di M. Nossa: A S. E. E. Bodrero / omaggio / M. Nossa
https://galileodiscovery.unipd.it/discovery/fulldisplay?context=L&vid=39UPD_INST:VU1&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&tab=Everything&docid=alma99000734808020604
Di castello in castello. Su Michael Haneke e Franz Kafka tra testo e immagine
No full textL'articolo muove da un'analisi dello sceneggiato televisivo del regista austriaco Michael Haneke tratto dal romanzo di Kafka "Il Castello". Si tratta di una "Verfilmung" poco nota, che presenta una interessante interpretazione dell'opera kafkiana, prestando una particolare attenzione alla questione dell'estraneità, della perdita di riferimenti, dell'annullamento spazio-temporale
Le confederazioni dei “populi Latini” fino al “foedus Cassianum”
No full textNel corso della storia romana arcaica si sono susseguite, prima del foedus Cassianum, varie altre confederazioni politiche all’interno del nomen Latinum. La più antica di esse risale all’epoca di Tullo Ostilio e fu costituita da populi latini contro Roma. Essa aveva sede in una località chiamata lucus Ferentinae. Successive distinte confederazioni furono costituite tra Romani e Latini durante i regni di Tarquinio Prisco e di Servio Tullio. Nell’epoca di Tarquinio il Superbo, Roma risulta parte della confederazione presso il lucus Ferentinae con gli altri Latini. Nell’età della repubblica romana, fino al 493 a.C., quest’ultima confederazione risulta ancora esistente e nuovamente contrapposta a Roma. Nell’articolo si offre una disamina delle norme pattizie che regolarono il funzionamento delle confederazioni note. Particolare attenzione è prestata alle confederazioni del lucus Ferentinae, meglio delineate dalle fonti. In esse, il magistrato supremo di una delle civitates confederate poteva avere per trattato un ruolo politico egemone (è chiamato da Dionigi di Alicarnasso ἡγεμὼν τοῦ ἔθνους), mentre le competenze militari spettavano a due generali eletti. Le fonti non permettono di affermare che sia mai esistito un “dittatore latino”.In ancient Roman history, in the period before the foedus Cassianum, various political confederations followed one another within the nomen Latinum. The most ancient of them dates back to the age of Tullus Hostilius and it was constituted by Latin peoples against Rome. It had its seat in a place called lucus Ferentinae. Subsequent distinct confederations were formed by Romans and Latins during the reigns of Tarquinius Priscus and Servius Tullius. It emerges from the sources that in the age of Tarquinius Superbus Rome was part of the confederation based at the lucus Ferentinae with the other Latin peoples. In the age of the Roman republic, until 493 B.C., the latter confederation still existed and was once again opposed to Rome. In this article the author offers a close observation of the rules governing the agreements which constituted these confederations. Special attention is devoted to the confederations of the lucus Ferentinae, the ones best explained by the sources. In them, the supreme magistrate of one of the confederate civitates could have, according to the treaty, a leading political role (he is called ἡγεμὼν τοῦ ἔθνους by Dionysius of Halicarnassus), whereas military competence was reserved to two elected generals. The sources do not allow to assert that a “Latin dictator” ever existed
- …
