1,721,472 research outputs found
Une vision partiale de Silos
No full textKlein Peter K. Une vision partiale de Silos. In: Bulletin Monumental, tome 174, n°2, année 2016. pp. 187-193
Rupert de Deutz et son commentaire illustré de l'Apocalypse à Heiligenkreuz
No full textKlein Peter K. Rupert de Deutz et son commentaire illustré de l'Apocalypse à Heiligenkreuz. In: Journal des savants, 1980, n°1-2. pp. 119-140
Un fragment illustré d’époque carolingienne du commentaire de Bède sur l’Apocalypse
No full textKlein Peter K. Un fragment illustré d’époque carolingienne du commentaire de Bède sur l’Apocalypse. In: Bulletin Monumental, tome 170, n°1, année 2012. pp. 43-45
Spéculations sur un codex du Haut Moyen Âge : le commentaire de Beatus en provenance de San Miguel de Escalada
No full textKlein Peter K. Spéculations sur un codex du Haut Moyen Âge : le commentaire de Beatus en provenance de San Miguel de Escalada. In: Bulletin Monumental, tome 170, n°2, année 2012. pp. 167-168
Zu Genese und Deutung des Weltgerichtsbildes der Beatus-Handschriften
No full textKlein Peter K. Zu Genese und Deutung des Weltgerichtsbildes der Beatus-Handschriften. In: Iconographica. Mélanges offerts à Piotr Skubiszewski. Poitiers : Centre d'études supérieures de civilisation médiévale, 1999. pp. 123-134. (Civilisation Médiévale, 7
Der praktische Schluß des Aristoteles und das revealed preference Konzept der rationalen Entscheidungstheorie
Full text link
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
