189,121 research outputs found

    Kinney, P J, 2789592

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/397392Surname: KINNEY. Given Name(s) or Initials: P J. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 2789592. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: SEA-3843.234828 Item: [2016.0049.29685] "Kinney, P J, 2789592

    Kinney County Court House-Brackettville, Texas

    No full text
    Image of Kinney County Courthouse in Brackettville, Texas.Recto: [inscribed on negative] Kinney County Court House - Brackettville, Texas 6-P-53

    Kinney, Margt. (Death, 1876-04-11)

    No full text
    Address: 6 Walnut St.Age at death: 72 yrsPg 127/1876/194/F W M/Ireland/Dr. P. Kinney/Sullivan/St. Joseph'sOriginal record filed in drawer labeled 'KILIAN-KIRBY'

    sj-docx-1-cad-10.1177_00111287231193989 – Supplemental material for “Cannabis Businesses Are Being Good Contributors to the Community”: The Regulated Cannabis Industry and Cannabis Normalization in the United States

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cad-10.1177_00111287231193989 for “Cannabis Businesses Are Being Good Contributors to the Community”: The Regulated Cannabis Industry and Cannabis Normalization in the United States by Alexander B. Kinney in Crime & Delinquency</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Comparison of 2.5% agarose gel vs hyaluronic acid filler, for the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds

    No full text
    Background: Agarose gel filler is a natural hydrocolloid with a three-dimensional structure similar to the extracellular matrix, with gel formed by hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions rather than through chemical cross-linking or polymerization. Objective: To determine efficacy and safety of 2.5% agarose gel filler for the correction of nasolabial folds. Methods: In this split-face study, efficacy, safety, and usability of 2.5% agarose gel were compared to those of NASHA-L. Assessments included the nasolabial fold (NLF) Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS [blinded investigator]), subject satisfaction, safety (adverse events), and usability. Results: Sixty-six subjects were treated, and 46/66 (66.7%) were available for evaluation at 3&nbsp;months, when mean change in WSRS was identical for both products (−1.1&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.4 for 2.5% agarose; −1.1&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.4 for NASHA-L). Scores for each product remained similar across all time points and began to return to baseline between 7 and 8&nbsp;months. GAIS score followed a similar pattern, rising between months 7 and 8 (2.7&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.6 for 2.5% agarose at month 7-3.3&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.5 at month 8 and 2.7&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.6 for NASHA-L at month 7-3.3&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.5 at month 8). Ultrasound confirmed the longevity of both fillers between 7 and 8&nbsp;months. All adverse events were transient in nature and resolved within 15&nbsp;days. Most events were mild in nature, and the number of events was similar between the two fillers. Conclusion: Treatment with 2.5% agarose gel resulted in improvement that persisted for between 7 and 8&nbsp;months. The treatment effect was equivalent to NASHA-L

    Confidentiality of the SynLBD

    No full text
    We describe the confidentiality protection provided by the SynLBD. The presentation was originally prepared by Saki Kinney for the World Statistics Congress 2013.Kinney's work sponsored under NSF Grant ITR-0427889 and Triangle Census Research Network (TCRN; NSF Grant 1131897). Funding for the workshop is provided by the National Science Foundation (CNS-1012593, SES-1131848) and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore