54 research outputs found

    Reimagining international law of privacy in the digital age

    No full text
    © 2019 Kinfe Yilma DestaThis thesis examines the question of how international law should respond to the challenges of securing digital privacy. Driven mainly by the transnational nature of privacy threats involving private actors as well as States, calls are increasingly made for an ‘international’ privacy framework to meet these challenges. The thesis investigates such recurring calls from the perspective of two global privacy initiatives that posit a progressive vision for the right to privacy in the digital age. Using Internet Bill of Rights (IBRs) and the ongoing United Nations (UN) discourse on the ‘right to privacy in the digital age’ as case studies, it examines the role of emerging initiatives in reimagining current international law of privacy in the digital age. Scholarship investigating IBRs, the (data) privacy literature and the broader field of international law are yet to interrogate the role of, or situate, such initiatives in international law. Nor has international law’s role in addressing the ‘privacy problem’ in the digital environment been considered in the literature. In response to this lacuna, the thesis takes the novel approach of exploring the role of IBRs and the evolving UN privacy discourse in making international privacy law better-equipped in the digital age. The thesis begins by examining whether current international law of privacy is equipped to address the challenges presented by the digital age. It finds that because of historical antecedents, the normative and institutional structures of international privacy law are ill-equipped to address the ‘privacy problem’ in the digital age. The thesis then examines the role of IBRs and the UN Privacy discourse in making the international law of privacy better-equipped in the digital age. It demonstrates that the ‘freestanding’ and ‘contributory’ roles of these initiatives are negligible, but they possess a ‘catalytic’ role which may shape the normative and methodological directions of a more practical reform. Adopting a pragmatic approach, this thesis argues that addressing the privacy problem in the digital age requires reimagining the law along the direction charted in those initiatives but through an approach that is incremental, practical, multifaceted and programmatic. Mapped onto the overarching international human right to privacy framework and drawing upon global privacy initiatives, the thesis then proposes two layers of privacy law reform. It, first, presents the case for a soft law approach towards addressing normative gaps, and secondly, argues for a dialogical approach towards lessening institutional-structural gaps in international privacy law

    Reimaginando o constitucionalismo digital / Reimagining digital constitutionalism

    No full text
    O constitucionalismo digital tem estado em voga nos últimos anos. Uma série de artigos acadêmicos, coletâneas e monografias que utilizam o termo-chave proliferaram. Isso, por sua vez, inspirou um crescente número de estudos críticos que questionam a coerência normativa e teórica, bem como o valor epistêmico do constitucionalismo digital. Os críticos lamentam o uso da antiga noção de constitucionalismo para descrever o que consideram ser meras iniciativas regulatórias e autorregulatórias que não atendem aos seus mínimos normativos essenciais bem estabelecidos. Ao retratar o constitucionalismo digital sob essa ótica, esses críticos o apresentam como um projeto impulsionado, ou mesmo capturado, por atores do setor privado, a saber, as grandes plataformas digitais. Este artigo busca desafiar e trazer nuances a essas recentes críticas contundentes ao constitucionalismo digital. Ao situar suas origens e evolução no movimento das cartas de direitos digitais, sustenta a necessidade de reimaginar o constitucionalismo digital como um discurso. Assim, o artigo espera reabilitar e esclarecer o papel e o valor epistêmico do constitucionalismo digital como um discurso incipiente, gradual e fundamentalmente exortativo. De modo inovador, argumenta que enquadrar o constitucionalismo digital como discurso descreve com precisão suas dimensões ontológicas e normativas, ao mesmo tempo em que responde às preocupações de seus detratores. Digital constitutionalism has been in vogue in recent years.A series of journal articles, edited collections and monographs that front the catch term have mushroomed. This has, in turn, inspired a growing body of critical scholarship that questions the normative and theoretical coherence as well as epistemic value of digital constitutionalism. Critics deplore the use of the age-old notion of constitutionalism to describe what they consider to be mere regulatory and self-regulatory initiatives which do not meet its well-established core normative minimums. In casting digital constitutionalism in this light, critics present it as a Project driven primarily or hijacked by private sector actors, namely big digital platforms. This article seeks to challenge and bring some nuance to such recent sharp criticisms of digital constitutionalism. By positioning its origins and evolution in the digital bill of rights movement, it makes the case for reimagining digital constitutionalism as a discourse. The article thus hopes to rehabilitate and clarify the role and epistemic value of digital constitutionalism as a discourse that is an inchoate, gradualist and fundamentally hortatory. In a novel approach, it argues that framing digital constitutionalism as a discourse depicts accurately its ontological and normative dimensions but also attends to the concerns of its detractors

    Data Privacy Law and Practice in Ethiopia

    No full text

    The United Nations data privacy system and its limits

    No full text
    corecore