1,721,079 research outputs found

    Systemic lupus erythematosus

    No full text
    This review covers major advances in clinical issues related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) published between 1995 and 2000. The classification criteria for both SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been updated, and up to 19 different subsets of neuropsychiatric lupus have been defined. New epidemiological data show that the incidence of new cases and the survival of patients with SLE are both increasing. Several randomised controlled trials have defined the role of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, antimalarials, and hormonal treatment in the management of SLE. New data are available for drugs such as ciclosporin and thalidomide. Finally, several new treatments for severe refractory cases, such as mycophenolate mofetil and stem-cell transplantation, are being increasingly used. New data also refer to management of thrombosis in APS and high-risk pregnancies in women with SLE or APS

    HLA-DP genotyping in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: correlations with autoantibody subsets

    No full text
    In order to ascertain whether the HLA-DP locus plays a role in the genetic predisposition for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 42 patients with SLE were typed for 17 different DPBeta haplotypes by locus specific amplification followed by allele specific oligonucleotide hybridization. Sera from the same patients were assayed for the presence of autoantibodies to Sm, RNP, Ro, La and of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). DPB1*0301 and DPB1*1401 were increased in patients compared with 107 healthy controls, mainly in those anti-Sm/RNP positive and aCL positive. Remarkably, DPB1*1401 and DPB1*0301 have a nearly identical nucleotide sequence, suggesting that an epitope shared by their membrane products is of major importance for the DP related susceptibility to SLE

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore