1,720,960 research outputs found

    Explicating a model of interdisciplinary collaboration

    No full text
    Academic research is being confronted with a changing landscape. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap Initiative (2002) identified interdisciplinary collaboration as a major priority of all future research efforts. Numerous researchers have noted the increasing complexity of societal problems and the need to collaborate with colleagues across different disciplines to begin to solve these problems. Funding agencies are increasingly asking researchers to collaborate with one another. The current thinking is that this interdisciplinary model of inquiry will yield better results than more traditional models of inquiry. But little is known about the science surrounding interdisciplinary research. Empirical studies need to be done to further our understanding of how to best conduct interdisciplinary research. The current study was able to fill in gaps in the literature by providing evidence of important patterns inherent in interdisciplinary research. In addition, the study explicated a beginning model of collaboration for academic health care researchers working across disciplines to advance aging science. By becoming a participant observer in an interdisciplinary research center at a large urban university, this investigator was able to conduct a naturalistic study involving qualitative and quantitative methods to record research meetings, interview participants, compile field notes and survey members on their experiences as part of an interdisciplinary center. Using a model of team geriatric clinical collaboration developed by Heinemann & Zeiss (2002) as a framework, this investigator looked at structure, context, process and outcome domains for researchers working within an academic interdisciplinary center. Findings revealed a number of important patterns inherent in interdisciplinary research within each of those domains. As a result, a beginning model of collaboration was developed and explicated by this investigator: The Geriatric Interdisciplinary Research Team (GIRT) Model of Collaboration. The most productive research team in the study was shown to have overall high levels of functioning in the model domains. A major finding from this study was the importance of having a common research focus among team members. The study findings provide future researchers an empirical base for building and evaluating their collaborative research teams

    Build Healthy Acad Communities J

    No full text
    The multiple impacts of the environment on the health of populations can oftentimes be clouded by the daily care practices of healthcare providers. This case study describes an innovative graduate level elective course that uses a problem-based approach to apply evidence-based principles of environmental health to the care of populations. Initial implementation of the course, over two cohorts in 2023, had primarily second-degree undergraduate nursing students. Lessons learned included the necessity to provide peer-to-peer support for several of the graduate level assignments. Positive student outcomes included an expanded understanding of the three main content areas of the course: (1) how soil, air, and water must be considered in individual and population-centered care; (2) the impact of the design of the built and healthcare built environment; and (3) considerations of planetary health for sustainability and mitigation. Faculty outcomes included coaching of undergraduate students in this graduate course and the development of peer-to-peer mentoring activities.T42 OH008422/OH/NIOSH CDC HHSUnited States

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore