1,720,999 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Unusual split chimaerism after mismatched T-depleted BMT.
We report a case of haploidentical T-depleted BMT that engrafted durably after a highly immunosuppressive conditioning regimen. DNA polymorphism analysis showed that granulocytes and monocytes were donor type but T and B lymphocytes were host derived. Host tolerance to donor antigens was documented. The patient suffered from serious recurrent CMV infections until split chimaerism shifted to full donor type 2 years post-BMT. Seven years after BMT the patient remains in complete remission
Immunotherapy with alloreactive natural killer cells in haploidentical haematopoietic transplantation.
Natural killer cell recognition of missing self and haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation.
Human NK cell function is regulated by clonally distributed inhibitory receptors termed "Killer cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptors" (KIRs) that recognize epitopes ("KIR ligands") shared by HLA-C and HLA-B class I allele groups and every functional NK cell in the repertoire expresses at least one receptor for self HLA-class I molecules. Consequently, when NK cells are confronted with allogeneic targets which do not express the inhibiting class I ligand(s) NK cell alloreactions may occur. Donor versus recipient NK alloreactions occur in full HLA haplotype-mismatched ("haploidentical") hematopoietic transplants that are KIR ligand mismatched in the Graft-versus-Host (GvH) direction. Variable frequencies of functional NK cells in the donor repertoire expressing a KIR for the HLA class I group which is absent in the recipient as their sole inhibitory receptor for self, sense the missing expression of the self class I ligand on allogeneic targets and mediate alloreactions ("missing self" recognition). In clinical trials, donor versus recipient NK alloreactions are highly beneficial as they reduce the risk of leukemia relapse, do not cause GvHD and markedly improve event-free survival
Clinical impact of natural killer cell reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation.
Although the optimal donor for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling, 75% of patients do not have a match and alternatives are matched unrelated volunteers, unrelated umbilical cord blood units, and full HLA-haplotype-mismatched family members. This review will focus on the open issues of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation and on the benefits of natural killer (NK) cell alloreactivity and its underlying mechanisms. Donor-versus-recipient NK cell alloreactivity derives from a mismatch between inhibitory receptors for self major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules on donor NK clones and the MHC class I ligands on recipient cells. These NK clones sense the missing expression of the self MHC class I allele on the allogeneic targets ("missing self") and mediate alloreactions. Here, we review the translation of NK cell allorecognition into the clinical practice of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation and discuss how it has opened innovative perspectives in the cure of leukemia
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
