16 research outputs found

    Josh Matacotta's Quick Files

    No full text
    The Quick Files feature was discontinued and it’s files were migrated into this Project on March 11, 2022. The file URL’s will still resolve properly, and the Quick Files logs are available in the Project’s Recent Activity

    SCORE

    No full text
    There is substantial interest in the extent to which published findings in social-behavioral sciences are reproducible and whether it is possible to predict the likelihood of reproducing. Large-scale replication and prediction market projects in some subfields — particularly parts of psychology and economics — have provided initial evidence that reproducibility may be lower than expected or desired, and that surveys of experts and prediction markets may be effective at predicting reproducible findings. There is still much to learn about reproducibility across business, economics, education, political science, psychology, sociology, and other areas of social-behavioral sciences. In order to better assess and predict replicability of social-behavioral science findings, the Center for Open Science in partnership with Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is working to help advance this understanding

    IBHRI Guides

    No full text
    Guide

    Mental health concerns of undergraduate and graduate students: Depression, anxiety, eating concerns, and substance misuse

    No full text
    This study investigated mental health concerns reported by undergraduate and graduate college students attending a public university. The sample consisted of 1,451 students (Mage=23.6 years) seeking campus-based counseling services. The results show that depression, anxiety, eating concerns, and substance misuse are the most cited mental health concerns impacting academics and overall wellbeing. Data reveal other factors contributing to mental health concerns in the college population. These include a history of self-harm behaviors or suicide, past experiences of trauma, and uncertainty about or delay in accessing supportive services

    SCORE

    No full text
    There is substantial interest in the extent to which published findings in social-behavioral sciences are reproducible and whether it is possible to predict the likelihood of reproducing. Large-scale replication and prediction market projects in some subfields — particularly parts of psychology and economics — have provided initial evidence that reproducibility may be lower than expected or desired, and that surveys of experts and prediction markets may be effective at predicting reproducible findings. There is still much to learn about reproducibility across business, economics, education, political science, psychology, sociology, and other areas of social-behavioral sciences. In order to better assess and predict replicability of social-behavioral science findings, the Center for Open Science in partnership with Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is working to help advance this understanding

    IBHRI Guides

    No full text
    Guide

    IBHRI Guides

    No full text
    Guide

    SCORE

    No full text
    There is substantial interest in the extent to which published findings in social-behavioral sciences are reproducible and whether it is possible to predict the likelihood of reproducing. Large-scale replication and prediction market projects in some subfields — particularly parts of psychology and economics — have provided initial evidence that reproducibility may be lower than expected or desired, and that surveys of experts and prediction markets may be effective at predicting reproducible findings. There is still much to learn about reproducibility across business, economics, education, political science, psychology, sociology, and other areas of social-behavioral sciences. In order to better assess and predict replicability of social-behavioral science findings, the Center for Open Science in partnership with Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is working to help advance this understanding

    «Revised and corrected by the Author»: The 1947 Edition of Amo, dunque sono by Sibilla Aleramo

    No full text
    Il contributo indaga le varianti fra la redazione pubblicata nel 1947 del romanzo Amo, dunque sono di Sibilla Aleramo rispetto alla princeps del 1927. Dalla collazione delle due edizioni emerge infatti un lavoro di sfrondamento e sottrazione del testo, a cui contribuì anche Franco Matacotta, all’epoca compagno di Aleramo. Il risultato è una redazione non solo meno corposa, ma anche rimaneggiata per rimuovere elementi stilistici e di contenuto considerati inadatti al nuovo clima culturale e politico del dopoguerra.This paper examines the textual variants between the 1947 edition of Sibilla Aleramo’s novel Amo, dunque sono and its first edition, published in 1927. A comparison of the two editions reveals a process of abridgement and omission, to which Franco Matacotta – Aleramo’s partner at the time – also contributed. The result is an edition not only less substantial, but also revised to eliminate stylistic and thematic elements considered unsuitable for the new post-war cultural and political climate

    HIV, Depression, and Quality of Life Interventions: A Systematic Review

    No full text
    This systematic review is part of an All of Us Research Program project evaluating comorbidity in people with HIV. This systematic review aims to highlight the interconnected roles of depression and HIV to better understand the types of interventions that can improve quality of life in PWH
    corecore