7 research outputs found
LOCALIZING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS THROUGH VOLUNTARY LOCAL REVIEWS IN THE GAMBIA
No full textThis paper explores the importance of Voluntary Local Reviews (VLR) in the localization and acceleration of the attainment of a powerful global blueprint to deliver a better future. The paper regard Local voluntary Reviews as accelerators and an inclusive approach for the localization of the 2030 Agenda. According to the 2030 Agenda (A/RES/70/1: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development) encourages member states to “conduct regular and inclusive reviews of progress at the national and sub-national levels, which are country-led and country-driven”. The value of VLR in advancing SDG implementation has been increasingly recognized at national and international level. The Paper used documentary sources to gather information relevant to the thematic area. These included journal articles, books, local and regional governments reports. The researcher also examined the VLR pilot reviews in The Gambia supported by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) and other relevant partners. The Paper strongly recommends peer-to-peer learning to enrich VLR processes at local level with a view to bolster local action
COMPARATIVE LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO COVID-19 IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES: CASE IN GAMBIA AND INDONESIA
No full textThis study aims to evaluate the performance of two different local governments in two different nations using decentralization and policy implementation theories. It will also provide a general overview of the situation in these two nations at the time that Covid-19 began to spread. Using a comparative case study (CCS), this study compares local government response to Covid-19 in Gambia and Indonesia. In this study, the pandemic Covid-19 was given the same effect in each country but produced different results depending on government activities in each country. When the first Covid-19 cases appear in their countries, Gambia and Indonesia face a similar problem, but they also have a similar strategy for dealing with this pandemic outbreak. The Gambian government provides food, personal protective equipment (PPE), and essential sanitary items, as have several local governments in Indonesia. Gambia and Indonesia also establish a task force (both central and local government) to control virus spread, which becomes a key action in both countries' management of the Covid-19 outbreak. This research find that the role of local government in translating policy from the central government becomes critical to a region's success. A country's central government must not only maintain good performance in areas where it already excels, but also provide education and strong attention to local governments that are still struggling in order for them to improve their performance
Some of the works of Serigne Mouhammadou Masokhna Lo
Get PDFDate created: 1980s.The entire manuscript is available for download below as a single PDF file. Each page is also available as a separate, larger, JPG file. If higher-resolution JP2 files are needed (WARNING: files average 11-14MB in size), please contact [email protected].
Fieldwork Team: Dr. Fallou Ngom (PI), Cheikh Tidiane Fall (Co-applicant), Ablaye Diakite (Researcher), Birane Gassama (Researcher)
Technical Team: Roger Brisson (Head of Metadata Services, BU Libraries), Vika Zafrin (Institutional Repository Librarian, BU Libraries), Jack Ammerman (Associate University Librarian for Digital Initiatives and Open Access, BU Libraries), and Dr. Peter Quella.
This collection of Wolofal (Wolof Ajami) materials is copied as part of the EAP 334 Project (Digital Preservation of Wolof Ajami manuscripts of Senegal) led by Dr. Fallou Ngom in collaboration with WARA/WARC and Boston University Library. The project is funded by the British Library/Arcadia Endangered Archives.
Access Condition and Copyright: The materials are subject to copyright. Access is for research and educational purposes only. Materials are not to be reproduced without written permission.
Citation: Materials in this web edition may be cited as: Ngom, Fallou. 2011. African Ajami Library: EAP 334. Digital Preservation of Wolof Ajami Manuscripts of Senegal. Boston: Boston University Library: http://dcommon.bu.edu
For Inquires: Please, contact Professor Fallou Ngom ([email protected])These manuscripts are the originals handwritten by Serigne Mouhammadou Masokhna Lo. Based on the interview with the author, they were written in the 1980s. Red, green, and black ink are used in the manuscripts. The red and green ink are used to highlight key words and phrases. There are frequent insertions of Arabic phrases, which include quranic quotations and opening and closing formulae. The manuscripts contain several poems written by Serigne Mouhammadou Masokhna Lo, including a biographical eulogy of Serigne Mor Mbaye Cisse, a renowned Murid scholar and educator who lived and taught in Diourbel; and criticisms of social problems such as lack of discipline and good behavior, disorderly conduct, adultery, the negative consequences of alcoholism among men, women, young and old, and among leaders and their followers. The materials also include historical accounts of the five year long construction of the mosque of Diourbel (Jumaay Ndiaareem) using chronograms; the discussion between Serigne Modou Moustapha (who led the effort) and the French engineer responsible for the construction on the equipment needed; the construction of the railway between Diourbel and Touba; the personal qualities of Serigne Bassirou Mbacke; a tribute to Cheikh Ahmadou Bamba and to Serigne Mbacke Madina; the motivation of 28 kaamil (copies of the Qur'an) written by Serigne Fallou Mbacke for his father and spiritual guide Cheikh Ahmadou Bamba; and a tribute to Serigne Bousso, among others. The materials also contain a poem on coffee and its benefits.
Digitized on 17 July 2011.
According to the author, the documents were written in the 1980s.
Some images are difficult to read due to the poor condition of both the originals, which have ink stains, and the writing (especially those entirely written with black inks). The ink has faded away in some pages.This collection of Wolofal (Wolof Ajami) materials is copied as part of the EAP 334 Project (Digital Preservation of Wolof Ajami manuscripts of Senegal) led by Dr. Fallou Ngom in collaboration with WARA/WARC and Boston University Library. The project is funded by the British Library/Arcadia Endangered Archives
Some of the works of Serigne Mor Kayre
No full textDate created: unknown. The entire manuscript is available for download below as a single PDF file. Each page is also available as a separate, larger, JPG file. If higher-resolution JP2 files are needed (WARNING: files average 11-14MB in size), please contact [email protected].
Fieldwork Team: Dr. Fallou Ngom (PI), Cheikh Tidiane Fall (Co-applicant), Ablaye Diakite (Researcher), Birane Gassama (Researcher)
Technical Team: Roger Brisson (Head of Metadata Services, BU Libraries), Vika Zafrin (Institutional Repository Librarian, BU Libraries), Jack Ammerman (Associate University Librarian for Digital Initiatives and Open Access, BU Libraries), and Dr. Peter Quella.
This collection of Wolofal (Wolof Ajami) materials is copied as part of the EAP 334 Project (Digital Preservation of Wolof Ajami manuscripts of Senegal) led by Dr. Fallou Ngom in collaboration with WARA/WARC and Boston University Library. The project is funded by the British Library/Arcadia Endangered Archives.
Access Condition and Copyright: The materials are subject to copyright. Access is for research and educational purposes only. Materials are not to be reproduced without written permission.
Citation: Materials in this web edition may be cited as: Ngom, Fallou. 2011. African Ajami Library: EAP 334. Digital Preservation of Wolof Ajami Manuscripts of Senegal. Boston: Boston University Library: http://open.bu.edu
For Inquires: Please, contact Professor Fallou Ngom ([email protected])These materials are a collection of Wolof Ajami (Wolofal) poems by Serigne Mor Kayre (1869-1951). Red and black ink are used in the first set of original manuscripts. The red ink is used to highlight key words and phrases. There are also insertions of Arabic words and phrases, including in opening and closing formulae. The collection contains a hagiography of Prophet Muhammad, his family members and his miracles; a discussion on the battle of Badr; a song dedicated to Cheikh Ahmadou Bamba; a discussion on the norms for the construction of a mosque; a tribute to Serigne Modou Moustapha Mbacke (the first khalifa of the Muridiyya order); a tribute to Serigne Moussa Ka (his fellow Murid disciple and poet); and a table of contents summarizing the author's key pieces of work, among others.
Materials consist of 17 pages of the original manuscript and 53 photocopies of some of Serigne Mor Kayre's work copied by hand. Serigne Mor Kayre is the author and scribe of the 17 original pages, but the copyist of the 53 photocopied pages of his work is unknown.
Digitized on 24 July 2011.
Due to the age and poor quality of the photocopy of some pages, some lines are a hard to read. Many of Mor Kayre's original works are lost.This collection of Wolofal (Wolof Ajami) materials is copied as part of the EAP 334 Project (Digital Preservation of Wolof Ajami manuscripts of Senegal) led by Dr. Fallou Ngom in collaboration with WARA/WARC and Boston University Library. The project is funded by the British Library/Arcadia Endangered Archives
Comparative study of two Rift Valley fever virus field strains circulating in Mauritania in 2010 and 2013 reveals the high virulence of the MRU25010-30 strain isolated from camel
No full textAbstract Rift Valley fever (RVF) is one of the major viral arthropod-borne diseases in Africa. In recent decades, RVF virus (RVFV), the causative agent of RVF, has been responsible for multiple outbreaks in West Africa with important consequences on human and animal health. In particular, an outbreak occurred in 2010 after heavy rainfalls in the desertic region of Adrar, Mauritania. It was characterized by the appearance of severe clinical signs among dromedary camels. Another one occurred in 2013-2014 across Senegal and the southern part of Mauritania. In this study, we characterized two RVFV field strains isolated during these two outbreaks. The first strain, MRU25010-30, has been isolated in camel (2010) while the second, MRU2687-3, was isolated in goat (2013). By deep-sequencing and rapid amplification of cDNA-ends by polymerase chain reaction (RACE-PCR), we successfully sequenced the complete genome of these two RVFV strains as well as the reference laboratory strain ZH548. Phylogenetic analysis shows that the two field viruses belong to two different RVFV genetic lineages. Moreover, we show that MRU25010-30 replicates more efficiently in various in vitro cell culture models than MRU2687-3 and ZH548. In vivo , MRU25010-30 caused rapid death of BALB/c mice and proved to be more virulent than MRU2687-3, regardless of the route of inoculation (subcutaneous or intranasal). The virulence of MRU25010-30 is associated with a high viral load in the liver and serum of infected mice, while the death of mice infected with MRU2687-3 and ZH548 correlates with a high viral load in the brain. Altogether, the data presented in this study provide new avenues to unveil the molecular viral determinants that modulate RVFV virulence and replication capacity Author Summary Rift Valley fever is an arboviral zoonosis caused by Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) belonging to the Phlebovirus genus. It poses a major risk for causing a public and animal health emergency and is a significant economic burden in many African countries. To date, our knowledge of the impact of RVFV genetic diversity on its virulence, replicative capacities and transmission by mosquitoes is limited. In this study, we fully sequenced two RVFV strains isolated in Mauritania during two distinct outbreaks (2010 and 2013) and show that they were genetically distant. Interestingly, we show that one of the strains (MRU25010-30) is able to replicate in vitro more efficiently than the other (MRU2687-3). Additionally, we show that high levels of viremia and viral load in the liver are associated with rapid death in BALB/c mice infected with MRU25010-30, whereas mice infected by MRU2687-3 tend to die later with high viral load in the brain. In conclusion, our study confirms that RVFV strains from distinct genetic lineages have different phenotypic characteristics such as virulence and replication capacity. These data provide a strong basis for further studies aimed at identifying the viral genetic determinants responsible for the observed phenotypes
Cryptoplax larvaeformis Burrow 1815
No full text<i>Cryptoplax larvaeformis</i> (Burrow, 1815) <p>(Figures 7 E, F)</p> <p>Chresonymy in Leloup (1933: 30–32).</p> <p> <i>Chiton larvaeformis</i> Burrow 1815: 179, pl. 28, figs 2–4; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46; Schwabe 2007: 149.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax larviformis</i>; de Blainvile 1818: 124.</p> <p> <i>Chitonellus laevis</i> Lamarck 1819: 317 (syntype MNHN 6017, type locality: “Nouvelle Holland ” [= Australia]); de Blainville 1825: 519; Berge 1847: 113; Fischer 1887: 882; Haddon 1886: 36–38, 41; Lamy 1923: 261; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 71; 1998: 105; Slieker 2000: 146; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46.</p> <p> <i>Chiton chitonellus</i> Sowerby 1822: pl. 139, figs 4–5; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 26.</p> <p> <i>Chiton eruciformis</i> Sowerby 1822: pl. 139, fig. 5 [<i>nomen nudum</i>].</p> <p> <i>Chiton chitonellus</i> de Blainville 1825: 550; Haddon 1886: 37; Kaas & Van Belle 1998: 45; Slieker 2000: 141; Gowlett- Holmes 2001: 46.</p> <p> <i>Chiton vermiformis</i> de Blainville 1825: 553 (de Blainville wrote, that he saw two specimens in the NHM, but the first author failed in finding them, type locality:? New Holland [= Australia]); Haddon 1886: 37; Pilsbry 1893: 57; Iredale & Hull 1925: 102; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 139; 1998: 197; Slieker 2000: 154; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46.</p> <p> <i>Chiton fasciatus</i> Quoy & Gaimard 1835 (<i>non</i> Wood, 1815): 408, pl. 73, figs 21–29 (syntype MNHN lost, type locality: Polynesia: Tonga: Ha`apai group [19°48’S 174°21’W]: Pangai-Modou reef); Berge 1847: 113, pl. 20, fig. 6; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 46; 1998: 71; Slieker 2000: 143; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46.</p> <p> <i>Chitonellus fasciatus</i>; Reeve 1847: pl. 1, fig. & spec. 2a–b; Dall 1879: 299; van Bemmelen 1882: 95; 1883a: 1; Tryon 1883: 346, pl. 85, fig. 95; Haddon 1886: 36–38, 41, 48; Thiele 1893: 400, pl. 32, fig. 35; Plate 1897: 270; von Martens 1889: 199; Clessin 1904: 124, pl. 38, figs 1–2.</p> <p> <i>Chiton (Chitonellus) fasciatus</i>; Chenu 1859: 384, fig. 2891; E. A. Smith 1884: 86.</p> <p> <i>Chiton (Chitonellus) larvaeformis</i>; Chenu 1859: 384, fig. 2890; E. A. Smith 1884: 85.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax fasciatus</i>; Brazier 1877: 75; Fischer 1887: 883.</p> <p> ? <i>Cryptoplax montanoi</i> de Rochebrune 1882: 190 (one syntype MNHN 6066, Philippines: Sulu Islands [05°20’N 120°22’E]); Haddon 1886: 44; Pilsbry 1893: 58; Thiele 1909a: 9, 52; Ashby 1922a: 576, 1923b: 241; Iredale & Hull 1925: 102; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 87; 1998: 126; Slieker 2000: 148; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 47; Schwabe 2007: 153.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax peroni</i> de Rochebrune 1882: 193 (holotype MNHN 5985, type locality: “Nouvelle Holland ” [= Australia], based on one of the syntypes of <i>Chitonellus laevis</i> Lamarck, 1819); Haddon 1886: 44; Pilsbry 1893: 58; Thiele 1909a: 52, 56; Lamy 1923: 260; Iredale & Hull 1925: 102; Taki & Taki 1930: 105; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 98; 1998: 142; Slieker 2000: 149; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 47.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax (Chitonellus) fasciatus</i>; de Rochebrune 1883: 33.</p> <p> <i>Chiton (Chitonellus) eruciformis</i>; E. A. Smith 1884: 86; Haddon 1886: 36.</p> <p> <i>Chiton (Chitonellus) laevis</i>; E. A. Smith 1884: 86.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax coronatus</i> de Rochebrune 1884b: 238 (two syntypes at MNHN 6180, type locality: Polynesia: Tonga [19°20’S 174°23’W]); Thiele 1909a: 54; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 32; 1998: 52; Slieker 2000: 142; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 47.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax larvaeformis</i>; Haddon 1886: 37, pl. 3, figs 12a– 12m; Pilsbry 1893–94: 56 (1893), pl. 11, figs 31–36, 40–43 (1894); 1901a: 152, 154, pl. 14, figs 12–16; 1901b: 204; von Martens 1894: 92; Wettstein 1904: 473–504, pls 10–12; Nierstrasz 1905a: 73, pl. 6, figs 154–158; 1905b: 150; Horst & Schepman 1908: 523; Thiele 1909a: 54 (partim); 1931: 15; Iredale & Hull 1925: 101, pl. 12, figs 5, 10, 17, 25, 28, 35; 1927: 91, pl. 11, figs 5, 10, 17, 25, 28, 35; Ashby 1928: 167; Mackay 1930: 295; Taki & Taki 1930: 103; Bergenhayn 1930b: 38, pl. 10, figs 91–93; Leloup 1933: 30; 1940: 25, pl. 3, fig. 1, text fig. 8; 1949: 8, 9, fig. 3C; 1952: 53; Risbec 1946: 130, 134–144, figs 3–6; A. G. Smith 1960: 170, fig 44 1a–f; Kuroda 1960: 1; Fischer-Piette & Franc 1960: 1718, 1738, 1748, 1754, 1756, 1760, 1761, 1764, 1766, fig. 1556A; Ang 1967: 393, 423, pl. 16, figs 1–4; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 72; 1998: 106; Van Belle 1983: 136, pl. 12, fig. 4; Zeidler & Gowlett 1986: 113; Saito 1994: 144; Littler, Littler & Taylor 1995: 1679; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46; Higo <i>et al.</i> 1999: 31; Littler & Littler 1999: 158, text fig; Anonymous 2000: 172, text fig; Slieker 2000: 22, 54, pl. 15, figs 12–12a; Subba Rao & Dey 2000: 5; Wells 2000: 94; Schwabe 2001: 27; 2005a: 54, pl. 2, fig. 11; 2006b: 20; Saito 2001: 23, pl. 11, fig. 3; Xiutong 2004: 4, pl. 2 fig. A; Schwabe & Wanninger 2006: 218, fig. 18.1C; Saito 2006c: 131; Schwabe 2007: 149, figs 3, 4A, C, 5A, C, E, 6A, C.</p> <p> <i>Chitonellus rostratus</i> (<i>non</i> of Reeve, 1847); Thiele 1893: 400, pl. 32, fig. 38.</p> <p> <i>Chitonellus larvaeformis</i>; Pelseneer 1898: 7, 22, 26, pl. 9, fig. 79; Clessin 1904: 123, pl. 40 (not 41 as reported by him), fig. 2.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax lamarcki</i> Thiele 1909 a [<i>nomen nudum</i>, a manuscript name of de Rochebrune, used for the second syntype of <i>Chitonellus laevis</i> Lamarck, 1819): 54; Lamy 1923: 261; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 71; 1998: 105; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 47.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax laevis</i>; Dupuis 1918: 529; Ashby 1923b: 239.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax (Chitonellus) larvaeformis</i>; Ashby 1922a: 576.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax (Chitonellus) laevis</i>; Ashby 1922a: 577; 1926: 383.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax (Chitonellus) lamarcki</i>; Ashby 1922a: 577.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax laerviformis</i> [<i>sic</i>]; Bergenhayn 1930b: 54.</p> <p> <i>Chiton cruciformis</i>; Kaas & Van Belle 1980: 34; 1998: 56; Slieker 2000: 142; Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 46.</p> <p> <i>Cryptochiton</i>; Morton & Raj 1981: 84, pl. IV.8.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoconchus</i>; Morton & Raj 1981: 86.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoconchus</i> [cf.] <i>japonicus</i>; Morton & Raj 1981: 108, pl. IV.18.</p> <p> <i>Chiton</i> [sp.]; Abrea 1981: 9, figs 1–3.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax</i> [sp.]; Coleman 1981: 33 (upper picture).</p> <p> <b>Locus typicus:</b> Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Primary type:</b> Holotype (NHM 1951.1.28.1).</p> <p> <b>Fiji records:</b> <i>Cryptochiton</i>; Morton & Raj 1981: 84, pl. IV.8.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoconchus</i>; Morton & Raj 1981: 86.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoconchus japonicus</i> (...or a related species); Morton & Raj 1981: 108, pl. IV.18.</p> <p> <i>Cryptoplax larvaeformis</i>; Haddon 1886: 37, pl. 3, figs 12a–m; Pilsbry 1893: 56, pl. 11, figs 31–34, 40–43; Littler & Littler 1999: 158.</p> <p> <b>Material examined:</b> USP Mol 2616: 1 adult spm, main Barrier Reef east of Bulia Island [18°50'S 178°35'E], leeward under live coral, USP Kadavu Expedition, leg. J. Browning, 20 July 1970, dry; USP Mol 2660: 1 subadult spm, main Barrier Reef, East of Bulia Island [18°50'S 178°35'E], windward under coral, leg. J. Browning, 17 July 1970, wet; USP Mol 2682 6 adult spms, east of Yaukuve Levu Island [18°48'S 178°31'E], under exposed coral rock, USP Kadavu Expedition, leg. J. Browning 21 July 1970 (on label 1920), wet; ZISP: 2 juvenile spms, Cicia Island [17°45’S 179°18’W], Callisto St. 83, 0.3 m, leg. Boris I. Sirenko, 0 6 February 1975, wet; ZISP: 1 adult spm, Tuvutha Island [17°40’S 178°48’W], Callisto St. 89, 25 m, leg. Boris I. Sirenko, 0 7 February 1975, wet.</p> <p> <b>Habitat:</b> Morton & Raj (1981) wrote that the species might be found in dead coral limestones in the disused shafts of sipunculids and bivalves. The investigated material shows that the habitat is indeed coral skeletal pieces but the species seems to be actively crawling under them also. Noteworthy is that all specimens were collected close to the fringing reefs of the mentioned localities.</p> <p>In accordance with the examined material, this shallow water species seemingly has a preference for the underside of coral skeletal fragments lying in fine sand along reef edges.</p> <p> <b>Distribution:</b> Due to uncertainty in differentiating <i>C. larvaeformis</i> from similar species [e.g., <i>Cryptoplax oculatus</i> (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835), see Schwabe 2007] the exact distribution pattern of this species remains unclear. In the West it is known from the Andaman Sea (Subba Rao & Dey 2000: 5), in the Northeast from Japan (Saito 2001: 23), in the Southeast from Samoa (Pilsbry 1901: 156), and in the South from New Caledonia (Risbec 1946: 134) and Australia (Gowlett-Holmes 2001: 47).</p> <p> <b>Remarks:</b> Littler & Littler (1999) pointed out that the species may modify coralline algae structures due to its feeding activities. Flat and two-dimensional crustose coralline algae of the species <i>Porolithon okodes</i> (Heydrich, 1897) alter their form to three-dimensional honeycomb heads when the chitons graze on them.</p> <p> Recently Saito (2006c: 131) synonymised <i>Cryptoplax dimidiata</i> Ang, 1967 with the present species, but unfortunately he did not explain this decision. The arguments Ang (1967: 427) gave for separating both species seem constant and sufficient to consider both as distinct species. The characters the author pointed out are for instance 1) a different colouration of the girdle spines, and of the articulamentum (deep red in the anterior region in <i>C. dimidiata</i>, while pinkish in the central part of <i>C. larvaeformis</i>), 2) the different number of valves being in touch (the anterior five in <i>C. dimidiata</i>, compared to four in <i>C. larvaeformis</i>), 3) a different form of the head valve (oblong with flattened base in <i>C. dimidiata</i>, while subtriangular with rounded corners in <i>C. larvaeformis</i>), 4) differences in the length of the incisions (not half the length of the tegmentum in <i>C. dimidiata</i>, but almost as long as the tegmentum in <i>C. larvaeformis</i>), 5) a different orientation of the jugal sinus (diagonal to the surface in <i>C. dimidiata</i>, in <i>C. larvaeformis</i> almost vertical instead). As long as no direct comparisions are possible between the types of both taxa, we do not follow Saito (2006c).</p>Published as part of <i>Schwabe, Enrico, Sirenko, Boris I. & Seeto, Johnson, 2008, A checklist of Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from the Fiji islands, pp. 1-52 in Zootaxa 1777</i> on pages 29-30, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/274284">10.5281/zenodo.274284</a>
