1,723,232 research outputs found
Bibliological study on Jia li tie shi ji chen
No full text日治時期，臺灣慣行之禮儀大多依朱子《家禮》及陳氏《家禮》，而陳氏《家禮》，即陳鳴盛《家禮帖式集成》一書。前賢為耳目所囿，謂翁仕朝傳抄本最為詳備，並根據「咸豐七年右文堂版」《家禮帖式集成》張泰開所撰〈序〉文，提出《家禮帖式》成於未第老儒成履中之手，陳鳴盛就《家禮帖式》擴大規模而成之說；然再三咀嚼「咸豐七年右文堂版」《家禮帖式集成》張泰開所撰〈序〉文，發現〈序〉文所透露之訊息，恐有待斟酌。《家禮帖式集成》公藏現今得見之完本有：咸豐七年右文堂藏板、咸豐十年萃芳樓藏板、咸豐十年維經堂藏板、翰寶樓藏板、近文堂藏板；香港公共圖書館翁仕朝藏本與香港中文大學藏本則為殘卷。前賢拘於所聞，謂翁仕朝藏本為抄本，且為咸豐七年右文堂刊本；殊不知翁氏藏本僅存下冊刻本，無從得知鐫版時間及書坊名稱，何來「手抄本」、「咸豐七年右文堂刊本」之說？右文堂本前有二序，餘書則僅有一序；分就板式、書目著錄、書序內容觀之；張泰開所書之序，絕非《家禮帖式》之序，當係成履中《五經類聯》書序，書坊裝訂之際誤置。《家禮帖式》既非成履中所撰，則何來陳鳴盛就其書擴大其規模之說？就書中引述之人、事，嘗試辨別作者時代，恐係乾隆年間至道光年間之儒生所為，雖嘉慶年間桑園圍之生員陳鳴盛、海康縣之增貢陳鳴盛均頗為疑似，然文獻徵信闕疑，唯有待疑存之，俟諸他日。During Japanese colonial period, Zu Xi's Jia li and Chen Mingsheng's Jia li tie shi ji chen were the most popular guidance books of rituals followed by Taiwanese. According to Cheng Kaitai's preface of Yowentag edition published in Xianfeng 7th year, the original author of Jia li tie shi was Cheng Richung, an old scholar who could not pass the imperial examination. Chen Mingsheng expanded the content and revised it as Jia li tie shi ji chen. However, the information revealed in the preface was a mistake. Several complete editions were found such as Yowentag edition in Xianfeng 7th year, Tsuifaglou edition in Xianfeng 10th year, Weijingtang edition in Xianfeng 10th year, Hanbaolou edition, Jinwentang edition. Wongshichao's collection at Hong Kong Public Libraries and collection at The Chinese University of Hong Kong Library are fragments. Researchers erroneously informed that Wongshichao's collection was a manuscript and published by Yowentang in Xianfeng 7th year. In fact, Wongshichao's collection was block-printed and only second half left, so there is no information about publication time and publisher. There are two prefaces in Yowentang edition and only one in other editions. After analyzing the context, it is obviously that Cheng Kaitai's preface was written for Cheng Richung's Wu jing lei lien instead of Jia li tie shi. The mistake was made by the bookstore while binding the book. Upon reviewing the people and events in the book, it is concluded that Jia li tie shi ji chen was written by a scholar in the year between Chien Lung and Dao Guang
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
sj-docx-1-tct-10.1177_15330338231194555 - Supplemental material for Identifying TYMP as an Immune Prognostic Marker in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-tct-10.1177_15330338231194555 for Identifying TYMP as an Immune Prognostic Marker in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Shao-An Chen, Jun-Peng Zhang, Ning Wang and Ji Chen in Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment</p
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
