128 research outputs found

    A broadly tuned network for affective body language in the macaque brain.

    No full text
    Data and visual stimuli from the publication: *Taubert, J., Japee, S., Patterson, A., Wild, H., Goyal, S., Yu, D., Ungerleider, L. G. (accepted) A broadly tuned network for affective body language in the macaque brain

    A broadly tuned network for affective body language in the macaque brain.

    No full text
    Data and visual stimuli from the publication: *Taubert, J., Japee, S., Patterson, A., Wild, H., Goyal, S., Yu, D., Ungerleider, L. G. (accepted) A broadly tuned network for affective body language in the macaque brain

    A broadly tuned network for affective body language in the macaque brain.

    No full text
    Data and visual stimuli from the publication: *Taubert, J., Japee, S., Patterson, A., Wild, H., Goyal, S., Yu, D., Ungerleider, L. G. (accepted) A broadly tuned network for affective body language in the macaque brain

    A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects

    No full text
    Data, stimuli, and experimental materials from the publication: Keys, R.T., Taubert, J. & Wardle, S.G. A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects. Atten Percept Psychophys 83, 1942–1953 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02267-

    A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects

    No full text
    Data, stimuli, and experimental materials from the publication: Keys, R.T., Taubert, J. & Wardle, S.G. A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects. Atten Percept Psychophys 83, 1942–1953 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02267-

    A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects

    No full text
    Data, stimuli, and experimental materials from the publication: Keys, R.T., Taubert, J. & Wardle, S.G. A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects. Atten Percept Psychophys 83, 1942–1953 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02267-

    Drosera chrysolepis Taubert 1893

    No full text
    9. Drosera chrysolepis Taubert (1893: 505). Figures 7a, 11g –k Lectotype (designated by Silva & Giulietti 1997):— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Serra do Cipó, 1891/92, Glaziou 18857 (K-000432548!; isolectotypes B-100272048!, P-00749151!). Perennial, caulescent, stem well-developed (1–46 cm in length) with distinct internodes. Active growing leaves few to numerous (3–13), with circinate vernation, petiole linear, 2–3 times narrower than the lamina, lamina lanceolate; stipules triangular to narrowly triangular, divided into few to several laciniae on the apical 1/2–1/3, golden-brown, often with paler margins. Dense indumentum of long white eglandular trichomes and TSG trichomes on leaves, scapes, pedicels and sepals. Petals obovate to broadly obovate, overlapping in anthesis, pink; gynoecium 3-carpelate, styles bifurcated at the base. Seeds oblong, testa reticulate. Illustrations: — Silva & Giulietti (1997: 101, figs. 13A, C–M—habit and details); Rivadavia (2003: 86, figs. 3.2A– F—habit and details). Distribution: — Brazil (Northeast: BA; Southeast: MG), endemic. Drosera chrysolepis presents a patchy distribution in the campos rupestres of the Espinhaço Range, from the municipality of Caeté (central Minas Gerais) to the Chapada Diamantina (in Bahia), and disjunctly on coastal sandy plains (restingas) in central coastal Bahia (Fig. 7a). Habitat: —In the Espinhaço Range D. chrysolepis is found in wet areas of campo rupestre vegetation on sandy to sandy peat soils, or in drier areas on sandy soil with white quartz gravel, at elevations around 1200–1800 m. On the coastal restingas it is found just a few meters above sea level on wet sandy flats. Phenology:— Drosera chrysolepis produces flowers from April to September, corresponding to the end of the wet season and middle of the dry season. Conservation status: —Near Threatened (NT). Drosera chrysolepis is widely distributed though relatively localized within its range, usually in small populations restricted to very specific and fragile habitats. The calculated EOO (252,109 km 2) would place it in the LC category, however, the AOO (172 km 2) suggests EN. Although the species does not currently qualify for a category of threat, an observed reduction in area of occupancy due to mining, agriculture, cattle ranching, invasive grasses, and climate change in its campos rupestres range, as well as to urban expansion in its restinga range, all suggest that D. chrysolepis may likely qualify in the near future. It is found inside National Parks (Chapada Diamantina and Serra do Cipó, in BA and MG respectively) and State Parks (Rio Preto and Serra Nova, in MG), among other smaller locally protected areas. Notes: — Drosera chrysolepis is most similar to D. camporupestris, but is distinguished by characters discussed under that species. Previous records of D. chrysolepis from Ecuador and Peru (Correa & Silva 2005; assigned as possibly being D. camporupestris by Rivadavia 2003), turned out to be a distinct species, D. condor Gonella et al. (2016: 1421), closely related to the Venezuelan D. cendeensis Tamayo & Croizat (1949: 175) and the Peruvian D. peruensis Silva & Correa (2002: 543) (Gonella et al. 2016). Drosera chrysolepis was described by Taubert (1893) based on the specimen Glaziou 18857 from the Serra do Cipó, but the author did not cite the herbarium where this material was examined, which makes all known duplicates of this specimen syntypes. Silva & Giulietti (1997) cite the specimen deposited at K as an isotype, and Correa & Silva (2005) cite the specimen from P as the holotype. Even though the only specimen personally annotated by Taubert is the one held at B (thus representing the only suitable lectotype), the citation of the specimen from K as an isotype by Silva & Giulietti (1997) gives rise to an inadvertent lectotypification (ICN Arts. 7.11 and 9.10; Turland et al. 2018). Natural hybrids with D. quartzicola Rivadavia & Gonella (2011: 34) were reported in the publication of that species, but photographs and specimens examined are first provided here (see ‘Natural Hybrids’ below). Representative specimens examined: — BRAZIL. Bahia: Abaíra, Cachoeira das Anáguas, 1600 m, 24 February 1992, Stannard et al. H51558 (SPF, NY, MBM, SP). Ituberá, km 15 da estrada para a Praia de Pratigi, 08 October 2005, Rivadavia 2112 (SPF). Minas Gerais: Itacambira, estrada para Montes Claros (MG 308), 22 April 2010, Gonella et al. 288 (SPF). Rio Pardo de Minas, Parque Estadual da Serra Nova, 13 March 2007, Salino et al. 11740 (BHCB). Santana do Pirapama, Serra do Cipó, Fazenda Inhame (Serra Mineira), 23 March 1982, Cordeiro et al. CFSC 8185 (SP, SPF). Santana do Riacho, Serra do Cipó, bifurcação da estrada para Morro do Pilar e Conceição do Mato Dentro, 25 February 1997, Rivadavia & Pinheiro 558 (SPF). Serra do Cipó, 24 April 1892, Schwacke 8233 (OUPR-4297, OUPR-4298, OUPR-4299).Published as part of Gonella, Paulo Minatel, Sano, Paulo Takeo, Rivadavia, Fernando & Fleischmann, Andreas, 2022, A synopsis of the genus Drosera (Droseraceae) in Brazil, pp. 1-76 in Phytotaxa 553 (1) on pages 31-32, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.553.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/679668

    “Russian author” in 1739: Gottlieb Bayer, Ivan Taubert and the First Steps of Russian School Literary Canon

    No full text
    In the 1730s, the administration of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences redesigned the program of study at the Academy’s gymnasium. Their goal was to create an institution capable of preparing specialists not only for the Academy itself, but also for the civil service, which required people educated in both Russian and German. The regulation (reglament) developed by Georg Krafft in 1739, besides preserving the previous division of the gymnasium into Latin and German departments, redesigned the instruction offered by the German department to form a full curriculum, in which Russian-style instruction was as important as mastering the German language. This visionary project put together classes in which pupils whose native language was Russian would study in the same classroom as students whose native language was German, which led the Academy to develop a corpus of bilingual (German/Russian) textbooks. A key element of the syllabus was the study of “a Russian author” (analogous to the well-developed system of “reading authors” in European Latin schools), the first time this method had been introduced in a Russian school. Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer’s “Azov History” (Begebenheiten von Azow, 1736–37), translated into Russian by Ivan Taubert (1737), was chosen as the set text. The whole syllabus provided by Krafft’s 1739 gymnasium regulation, as well as the book-selling practice of the Academy in the early 1740s, makes it clear that the selection of Bayer's book was not coincidental — it corresponded well to the Russian reading public's ideas about proper verbal composition. The marginal status of verse (poetry) in this structure, combined with the actors’ attention to questions of style, provide the basis for a new narrative for Russian literary history of the 1730s, centered around the collective work of the translators of the under-studied Russian Society (Rossijskoe sobranie), established in 1735. Such a narrative would consider the whole catalogue of books published by the Academy, whether in Russian or in other languages

    Palliative care research centre's move into social media: constructing a framework for ethical research, a consensus paper

    No full text
    Background Social media (SM) have altered the way we live and, for many, the way we die. The information available on even the rarest conditions is vast. Free from restrictions of mobility, time and distance, SM provides a space for people to share experiences of illness, death and dying, and potentially benefit from the emotional and practical support of others n similar positions. The communications that take place in these spaces also create large amounts of ‘data’ which, for any research centre, cannot be ignored. However, for a palliative care research centre the use of this ‘data’ comes with specific ethical dilemmas. Methods This paper details the process that we, as a research, went through in constructing a set of ethical guidelines by which to work. This involved conducting two consensus days; one with researchers from within the centre, and one with the inclusion of external researchers with a specific interest in SM. Results The primary themes that emerged from the consensus meetings includes; SM as a public or private space; the status of open and closed groups; the use of historical data; recruiting participants and obtaining informed consent and problems of anonymity associated with dissemination. Conclusions These are the themes that this paper will focus on prior to setting out the guidelines that we subsequently constructed
    corecore