19,901 research outputs found
Oral History Interview with Joseph J. Russo
No full textJoseph Russo was drafted in 1968 and trained at Fort Dix, N.J. He served in a support battalion delivering food to troops.https://vc.bridgew.edu/vhp_stories/1039/thumbnail.jp
Denaturation of biological macromolecules :new programs for the deconvolution of DSC measurements
No full textG. Russo, J. Anastassopoulou, G Barone Eds
An exclusive essay by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Richard Russo and an excerpt
No full textAn exclusive essay by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Richard Russo and an excerpt written by him from the new book, A Healing Touch: True Stories of Life, Death, and Hospice. Five other Maine authors contributed to the book, which will benefit the Hospice Volunteers of the Waterville Area
Entanglement entropy and D1-D5 geometries
No full texthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.066004Giusto, Stefano, and Rodolfo Russo. "Entanglement Entropy and D1-D5 geometries." Physical Review D 90.6 (2014): 066004
Remarks on defective Fano manifolds
No full textThis note continues our previous work on special secant defective (specifically, conic connected and local quadratic entry locus) and dual defective manifolds. These are now well understood, except for the prime Fano ones. Here we add a few remarks on this case, completing the results in our papers (Russo in Math Ann 344:597–617, 2009; Ionescu and Russo in Compos Math 144:949–962, 2008; Ionescu and Russo in J Reine Angew Math 644:145–157, 2010; Ionescu and Russo in Am J Math 135:349–360, 2013; Ionescu and Russo in Math Res Lett 21:1137–1154, 2014); see also the recent book (Russo, On the Geometry of Some Special Projective Varieties, Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana, Springer, 2016)
On the theory of generalized FC-groups
No full textWe extend to FC *, the class of generalized FC-groups introduced in [F. de Giovanni, A. Russo, G. Vincenzi, Groups with restricted conjugacy classes, Serdica Math. J. 28 (2002) 241-254], some results known for FC-groups. The main theorem involves the extended residually finite property (ERF), i.e., all subgroups are closed in the profinite topology. The ERF-groups belonging to several large classes of groups have been determined, for example nilpotent groups [M. Menth, Nilpotent groups with every quotient residually finite, J. Group Theory 5 (2002) 199-217] and FC-groups [D.J.S. Robinson, A. Russo, G. Vincenzi, On groups whose subgroups are closed in the profinite topology, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 213 (2009) 421-429]. Here we generalize these results by classifying completely the ERF-groups belonging to FC *
On the Theory of generalized FC-Groups
No full textWe extend to FC, the class of generalized FC-groups introduced in [F. de Giovanni, A. Russo, G. Vincenzi, Groups with restricted conjugacy classes, Serdica Math. J. 28 (2002) 241–254], some results known for FC-groups. The main theorem involves the extended residually finite property (ERF), i.e., all subgroups are closed in the profinite topology. The ERF-groups belonging to several large classes of groups have been determined, for example nilpotent groups [M. Menth, Nilpotent groups with every quotient residually finite, J. Group Theory 5 (2002) 199–217] and FC-groups [D.J.S. Robinson, A. Russo, G. Vincenzi, On groups whose subgroups are closed in the profinite topology, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 213 (2009) 421–429]. Here we generalize these results by classifying completely the ERF-groups belonging to FC.
Keywords: Generalized FC-group; Profinite topolog
Predicate’, ‘Predicate Logic’, ‘Identity’, ‘Identity of the Indiscernibles’, ‘Abelard’ e ‘Bayes’
No full textBrevi voci enciclopediche per il volume di J. Williamson eF. Russo (a cura di), Key Terms in Logic, Continuum, UK. Pagine 33, 55, 80, 112, 115.
‘Thomas Bayes’ anche in The Reasoner, 2, 3, 9 (2008), ‘The Identity of the Indiscernibles’ anche in The Reasoner, 3, 1, 8 (2009) e ‘Abelard’ anche in The Reasoner, 3, 10, 11 (2009))
Generic versus Single-Case Causality: The Case of Autopsy
No full textThis paper addresses questions about how the levels of causality (generic and single-case causality) are related. One question is epistemological: can relationships at one level be evidence for relationships at the other level? We present three kinds of answer to this question, categorised according to whether inference is top-down, bottom-up, or the levels are independent. A second question is metaphysical: can relationships at one level be reduced to relationships at the other level? We present three kinds of answer to this second question, categorised according to whether single-case relations are reduced to generic, generic relations are reduced to single-case, or the levels are independent. We then explore causal inference in autopsy. This is an interesting case study, we argue, because it refutes all three epistemologies and all three metaphysics. We close by sketching an account of causality that survives autopsy—the epistemic theory
- …
