3,095 research outputs found

    Gosling, Mrs. J. E.

    No full text
    Photograph from the C.R. Savage Portrait Studio. Name associated with the photograph: Mrs. J. E. Goslin

    Mastering databases / Peter Gosling

    No full text
    include indexviii , 265 pages.

    QJE-STD-17-382.R2-Supplemental_Material – Supplemental material for Is the framing effect a framing affect?

    No full text
    Supplemental material, QJE-STD-17-382.R2-Supplemental_Material for Is the framing effect a framing affect? by Corentin J Gosling and Sylvain Moutier in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</p

    Evaluation of Methods to Estimate Gosling Survival

    No full text
    Five common approaches have been used to determine survival of Canada Goose goslings. Two focus directly on broods without marks (mean brood size and total gosling counts), two focus on counting either marked goslings or the goslings of marked adults, and the last is entirely statistical (recta-analysis). We briefly describe each technique and some inherent problems. We argue that comparisons of gosling survival rates based on average brood size or recta-analysis are likely to result in overestimation, while those based on total gosling counts may result in either under- or overestimation. Survival rates based on marked adults or goslings promise results closer to the true state of nature, although some problems will still persist

    Good Vibes: Evaluating the 'Ambiance' Elicited from Public Spaces

    No full text
    iv, 38 p.The present study explored the impressions of general ambiance, or 'vi be', elicited from bars and cafes. Impressions are drawn from inferences abstracted from people and their surroundings (Gosling, Gaddis, & Vazire, 2008, p. 340-341). These inferences contain valid information about the personalities, values, and dispositions of others. Buss (1987) has shown that people select, evoke, and manipulate social environments. The present study supports the suggestion that people also actively select, create, and manipulate the physical environments with which they interact (Gosling, Gaddis, & Vazire, 2008, p. 336-337). It is predicted that public establishments elicit an 'ambiance' that is generated by the personalities, trace behaviors, and identity claims of the patrons who frequent the location. Furthermore, it is this 'ambiance' that allows observers to make similar impressions. The 10 location observers who rated their impressions of the selected public establishments were undergraduate ·assistants receiving course credit for their participation. All establishments were located in the city of Austin proper and consisted of 25 b~s and 25 cafes. Each location was randomly selected from a comprehensive list and met the established criteria for 'bar' or 'cafe.' Planned analyses of the data include a case 3A intraclass correlation coefficient of a mixed factonal analysis of variance (ANOVA) of location observer scores by locations (10 x 50) for each of the descriptor items (see appendix A).Department of Social Psychology. University of Texas. Austin, Texas

    Parental behaviour and family proximity as key to gosling survival in Greylag Geese (Anser anser)

    No full text
    Reproductive success in monogamous species is generally affected by both behavioural and hormonal fine-tuning between pair partners. Vigilance, defence and brooding of offspring are among the main parental investments, and often the sexes adopt different roles. In the present study, we investigate how sex differences in parental behaviour and family proximity in the socially monogamous Greylag Goose (Anser anser) affect gosling survival. During the reproductive season in spring 2013, we recorded the behaviour of 18 pairs with offspring and gosling survival in a semi-tame, long-term monitored, and individually marked flock of Greylag Geese in Grünau, Austria. We found that behavioural role differentiation between the parents varied with developmental phase, and thus with gosling age. Especially during the first 10 days after hatching, females were foraging more frequently than males, which were more vigilant and aggressive towards other flock members. Such differences between the sexes levelled out 20 to 30 days after hatching. In general, females stayed in closer proximity to their offspring than males. Gosling survival was high when the parents were relatively aggressive and emphasized vigilance rather than foraging behaviour. Hence, we show a direct link between pair partners’ quality of parental investment and gosling survival.© The Author(s) 201
    corecore