1,720,954 research outputs found
نزهة المشتاق شرح لمع الشيخ أبي إسحاق على المنهج التوثيق والنقدي من أول الكتاب إلى مباحث الحقيقة والمجاز
ARABIC:
خلفية البحث : لقد كان لعلماء البلد الحرام عنايةٌ خاصَّةٌ بكتاب «اللمع» للإمام الشيخ أبي إسحاق إبراهيم بن علي الشيرازي (ت ٤٧٦هـ) ، وإقبال خاصٌّ على تدريسه ، وقد شرحه الشيخ محمد يحيى أمان الحنفي المكي (ت ١٣٨٢هـ) في كتابه «نزهة المشتاق»، وأهمية الكتاب ترجع إلى أهمية العلم المبحوث فيه وهو علم أصول الفقه، وإلى المتن المشروح فيه وهو كتاب «اللُّمَع» ، وإلى مكانة الشارح الشيخ محمد يحيى أمان العلمية ، وإلى أن المتن المذكور يقرر مسائل أصول الفقه على طريقة الجمهور بينما شارح المتن من علماء الحنفية ، وقد طبع الكتاب في حياة المؤلف مع اشتماله على كثير من الأخطاء النصية والسقطات المطبعية، لأجل ذلك حاول الباحث أن يتحصل على نسخته الخطية حتى تحصل على معلومات بأنها ضاعت بعد طباعته، ومع ذلك فقد تحصَّل بعد ذلك على نسخة من المطبوعة وعليها تصحيحات المؤلف نفسه، مما يساعد كثيرًا على تصحيح ودراسة هذا الكتاب خلال هذا البحث .
الهدف من البحث : إخراج جزء من الكتابِ المذكورِ محقَّقًا مُصحَّحًا منقَّحًا على الوجه الذي يغلب على الظن أن المؤلِّف الشيخ محمد يحيى أمان أراده وارتضاه ، مع دراسة عن كتاب اللمع ومؤلفه ، وكتاب نزهة المشتاق ومؤلفه ومنهجه وما فيه من مميزات ومآخذ .
منهج البحث : اتخذ الباحث المنهج النقدي والتوثيقي في تحقيق الكتاب المذكور ، وقدَّم على ذلك مقدمة تشتمل على دراسة حول متن «اللمع» ومصنِّفه الشيخ الشيرازي ، ودراسة حول كتاب «نزهة المشتاق» ، وقام بترجمة المؤلف الشيخ محمد يحيى أمان مع دراسة الأحوال السياسية والعلمية والحركة الأصولية من تدريس وتأليف في القرن الرابع عشر الهجري الذي عاش فيه المؤلف ، كما قام بمقارنة كتاب «نزهة المشتاق» بكتاب «بغية المشتاق» للشيخ محمد ياسين الفاداني ، وبيَّن أهمَّ الفروقات التي يختص كلُّ كتاب به دون الآخر، ثم حقَّق الباحث نصَّ كتاب «نزهة المشتاق» من أوَّله إلى آخر مباحث الحقيقة والمجاز ، وعزا المسائل الأصولية وغيرها إلى المصادر التي يظَنُّ أن الشارح رجع إليها ، مع تحقيق الأقوال ، وترجمة الأعلام الواردة في النصّ ، وتخريج الآيات القرآنية والأحاديث النبوية والشواهد الشعرية .
النتائج والتوصيات: توصَّل الباحث إلى أن الكتاب مطبوع في حياة المؤلف وقد فقدت نسخته الخطية وأن هذا غير مانع من تحقيقه ودراسته ، بل تُعَدُّ من الأصول الثانوية التي ينبغي الرجوع إليها في التحقيق ، وأن ما بقي من الكتاب حقيق بأن يوضع في أولوية الاهتمام بالدراسة والبحث في نصوصه على النهج والأسلوب المقرَّر في علم تحقيق النصوص ونشرها .
ENGLISH:
Background: The book The Refulgence of the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence (Al-Luma’) had been given a special care by the scholars of Makkah who also had a special interest in teaching it. Sheikh Muhammad Yahya Aman Al-Hanafi Al-Makki (died in 1382AH) had explained Al-Luma’ in his book Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq. The importance of his book is attributed to the importance of the science it discussed which is principles of Islamic jurisprudence (Usul Al-fiqih), to the text discussed in it which is from Sheikh Abu Ishaq Ibrahim ibn Ali Al-Shirazi Al-Shafi’i’s Al-Luma’, to the scientific status of Sheikh Muhammad Yahya Aman, as well as to the fact that the text aforementioned approves the issues of the principles of jurisprudence in the manner of the majority of scholars, while the text had been explained by a Hanafi scholar. The book was printed when the author is still alive, but it contained many mistakes and typographical errors. For that reason, the researcher have tried to look for a written copy for the book but he found out that the copy was lost after printing it. Fortunately, the researcher have obtained a printed copy containing the author’s corrections on those errors which helped a lot in correcting and studying this book through this research.
Research aim: The aim of the research is to produce a part of the aforementioned book, Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq, edited, corrected and revised in a way that the author Sheikh Muhammad Yahya Aman would most likely accept it, with a study of Al-Luma and its author and Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq and its author in addition to an explanation of the author’s approach in his book and stating its characteristics and drawbacks.
Methodology: The researcher have used the critical and the documentary approach to review the book aforementioned. He presented an introduction contained a study about Al-Luma’ and its author Al-Shaikh Al-Sherazi in addition to a study about the book Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq. He also wrote a biography of the author Al-Shaikh Mohammed Yahya Aman, with a study about the political and the scientific conditions and the fundamentalist movement back then during the author’s life in the 14th century AH. Moreover, The researcher has compared Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq with Al-Shaikh Mohammed Yassin Al-Fadani’s Bughiyat Al-Mushtaq and explained what distinguished each book from the other. The researcher also, investigated Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq’s text from the beginning to the end of the investigation of the truth and metaphor, and attributed the fundamentalist issues and others to the references which believed the author have used back then. In addition he reviewed the quotes and wrote biographies of each scholars who had been mentioned within the book, and provided authentications and verifications of Qur’an verses, Hadith and poetries that have been mentioned in the book.
Research recommendation: The researcher concluded that even though the book Nuzhat Al-Mushtaq was printed during the lifetime of the author and its written copy was lost, it does not preclude it from being revised and studied. Rather, the book is considered to be one of the secondary assets that should be referred to; and what is left from the book should be put into priority for studying and and researching on the approach and method established by the science of textual criticism and publication.
INDONESIA:
Latar belakang: Para ulama di Kota Suci Mekkah memiliki perhatian khusus pada kitab Alluma' karya Al-Imam Asy-Syaikh Abu Ishaq Ibrahim Bin Ali Asy-syirazi (wafat 476 H.) dalam mengajarkannya. Juga As-Syaikh Muhammad Yahya Aman Al-Hanafi Al-Makki (wafat 1382 H.) telah menjelaskan kitab tersebut dalam karangannya Nuzhatul Musytaq. Orgensi suatu kitab kembali pada orgensi bidang ilmu yg dibahas di dalamnya yaitu Ilmu Ushul Fikih, pada matan yg dijelaskan yaitu Alluma’, juga pada kedudukan pengetahuan yang menjelaskan kitab tersebut yaitu As-Syaikh Muhammad Yahya Aman dan pada objek pembahasan dalam matan tersebut yaitu Ilmu Ushul Fikih menurut metodologi Aljumhur padahal yang menjelaskan matan tersebut bermadzhab Hanafi. Kemudian Kitab Nuzhatul Musytaq telah diterbitkan semasa hidup pengarangnya yaitu As-Syaikh Muhammad Yahya Aman, akan tetapi terdapat di dalamnya banyak kesalahan tekstual dan beberpa kata yang terhapus, oleh karena hal itu Peneliti mencarikan manuskrip kitab tersebut sehingga dapat informasi bahwa manuskripnya sudah tidak ditemukan lagi, cuman setelah itu peneliti mendapatkan naskah cetakan kitab itu dengan koreksian pengarangnya yang sangat membantu untuk mengkoreksi juga mengkaji ulang dalam penelitian ini.
Tujuan Penelitian: Menerbitkan sebagian dari kitab tersebut yg telah diteliti, dikaji ulang dan dikoreksi sesuai dengan tata cara yang sekiranya ditujukan dan diinginkan oleh pengarang kitab tersebut. Juga memabahas tentang kitab Alluma' dan Pengarangnya, juga tentang kitab Nuzhatul Musytaq, pengarangnya, metode pembahasannya dan menjelaskan kelebihan juga kekurangan dari kitab tersebut.
Metode Penelitian: Peneliti memilih Metode Documenter dan Metode Kritis untuk penelitian dalam kitab tersebut. Dan memulai dengan pembukaan yang mencakup atas Pembahasan sekitar matan Alluma’ juga pengarangnya syaikh Syirazi. Dan Pembahasan sekitar kitab Nuzhatul Musytaq. Kemudian peneliti membahas tentang biografi Pengarang yaitu Syaikh Muhammad Yahya Aman juga Mengkaji keadaan Politik, keilmuan dan pengembangan Ilmu Ushul Fikih dalam pembelajaran dan pengarangan pada abad 14 hijriyyah masa kehidupan pengarang tersebut. Juga melakukan komparasi kitab Nuzhatul Musytaq dengan kitab Bughyatul Musytaq karangan Syaikh Muhammad Yasin Al-Fadani, dan menjelaskan perbedaan terpenting yang membedakan satu kitab dengan yang lainnya. Kemudian meneliti teks kitab Nuzhatul Musytaq dari awal sampai akhir pembahasan hakikat dan Majas. Juga merujukkan setiap pembahasan Ushul atau selainnya pada sumbar yang dianggap sebagai rujukan. Dengan mengkaji juga meneliti pendapat-pendapat para ulama yang terdapat dalam kitab tersebut. Juga menjelaskan biografi setiap orang yang tercantum namanya di dalam teks kitab tersebut dan menyebutkan rujukan setiap ayat dari Al-Qur'an, hadits-hadits Nabi saw dan bait-bait syair.
Simpulan dan Saran: peneliti mendapatkan kesimpulan bahwa kitab Nuzhatul Musytaq telah dicetak semasa hidup pengarang dan manuskripnya tidak ditemukan. Hal ini tidak menjadi penghalang untuk dijadikan sebagai bahan penelitian. Bahkan dianggap sebagai rujukan sekunder yang harus dijadikan referensi. Dan sisa kitab yang tidak diteliti dalam Tesis ini sangat pantas untuk diberi perhatian khusus supaya dijadikan bahan penelitian dengan metode yang ditetapkan dalam Ilmu Filologi
Penerapan Irigasi Tetes Emiter Tali Dengan Bebagai Selang Waktu Irigasi Pada Tanaman Semangka
The objectives of the research were (1) To know watermelon yield and irrigation water productivity of watermelon by used drip irrigation with nylon rope emitter on various time irrigation intervals, (2) To determined the good time irrigation interval for watermelon production by using the drip irrigation with nylon rope emitter. The research was conducted at the research field with four-time irrigation intervals were 1,2,3, and 4 days of time irrigation interval. The research was arranged in Completely Randomized Block Design. The result of the research showed that the time irrigation interval was not significantly affected yield and irrigation water productivity of watermelon. The soil moisture in the root zone at 30 cm depth of 23,23—23,88% before irrigation still in range of the available soil moisture content for plants. The average of watermelon yield and irrigation water productivity of watermelon were 5,07—5,45 kg/plant and 115,15—123,79 kg/m3. The good time interval of irrigation for watermelon production by using drip irrigation with rope emitter was 4 days time interval of irrigation
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
