1,720,976 research outputs found
The polished stone earrings of site RH5 and the distribution and chronology of the prehistoric earrings of coastal Oman
No full textThe authors describe the soapstone earrings from the shell midden site and cemeptery of RH5 at Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, and compare them with other similar finds from other sites of the coast of Oma
Osservazioni sul Neolitico dell'Appennino ligure-piemontese. Le raccolte di superficie di fine Ottocento
No full text
Monte d’Accoddi e il suo ruolo nella società prenuragica alla luce dei dati stratigrafici di Ercole Contu e delle ricerche recenti
No full textA summary of recent research on Monte d’Accoddi is presented, with new data and reflections, based on the field investigations of Ercole Contu. The monument, which has evoked connections to both the Eastern and Western worlds, remains unique in the Mediterranean, while also being strongly representative of Sardinian prehistory, tracing its developments. Through the study of this extraordinary context, it is possible to reconstruct the ways of transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic and identify the keys to understanding the “Ozieri” society, a protagonist in Sardinia and Mediterranean during the 4th millennium cal. BC
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
