1,721,164 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Classification of Molecular Structures Made Easy
Several problems in bioinformatics and cheminformatics concern the classification of molecules. Relevant instances are automatic cancer detection/classification, machine-learning pathologic prediction, automatic predictive toxicology, etc. Molecules may be represented in terms of graphical structures in a natural way: each node in the graph can be used to represent an atom, whilst the edges of the graph represent the atom-atom bonds. Labels (in the form of real-valued vectors) are associated with nodes and edges in order to express physical and chemical properties of the corresponding atoms and bonds, respectively. These structured data are expected to contain more information than a traditional (flat) feature vector, information that may strengthen the classification capabilities of a machine learner. This paper investigates the application of a novel Bayesian/connectionist classifier to this graphical pattern recognition task. The approach is much simpler than state-of-the-art machine learning paradigms for graphical/relational learning. It relies on the idea of describing the graph in terms of a binary relation. The posterior probability of a class given the relation is estimated as a function of probabilistic quantities modeled with a neural network, trained over individual vertex pairs in the graph. The popular and challenging Mutagenesis dataset is considered for the experimental evaluation. Despite its simplicity, the technique turns out to yield the highest recognition accuracies to date on the complete (friendly + unfriendly) dataset, outperforming complex machines (relational and graph neural nets, kernels for graphs, inductive logic programming techniques, etc.). Some preliminary chemical/biological implications are eventually hypothesized in the light of the results obtained
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Splash Singularities for a General Oldroyd Model with Finite Weissenberg Number
In this paper we study a 2D free-boundary Oldroyd-B model which describes the evolution of a viscoelastic fluid. We prove the existence of splash singularities, namely points where the free-boundary remains smooth but self-intersects. This paper extends the previous results obtained for the infinite Weissenberg number by the authors in Di Iorio et al. (Splash singularity for a free boundary incompressible viscoelastic fluid model, 2018. arXiv:1806.11089; Splash singularity for a 2D Oldroyd-B model with nonlinear Piola-Kirchhoff stress, Nonlinear Differ Equ Appl 24:60, 2017) to the more realistic physical case of any finite Weissenberg number. The main difficulty faced in this paper is due to the non-linear balance law of the elastic tensor, which cannot be reduced, as in the case of infinite Weissenberg, to a transport equation for the deformation gradient. Overcoming this difficulty requires a very accurate local existence theorem in terms of dependence on the Weissenberg number. The method in this case is based on the combined use of conformal transformations and lagrangian coordinates, whose formulation must however take into account the general balance law of the elastic tensor and its dependence on the Weissenberg number. The existence of the splash singularities is therefore guaranteed by an adequate choice of initial data, depending also on the elastic tensor, combined with stability estimates
The centipede genus Clinopodes C.L. Koch, 1847 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae): a reassessment of species diversity and distribution, with a new species from the Maritime Alps (France)
Diagnosis, circumscription, species-level taxonomy and geographical occurrence
of the genus Clinopodes C. L. Koch, 1847 (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha,
Geophilidae) are revised by integrating published information with new evidence
on its morphological diversity. Clinopodes is clearly distinguishable from all other
geophilid lineages by a combination of features mainly in the forcipular segment,
the trunk sternites and the ultimate legs. It is widespread in south-eastern Europe,
from the Alps to the Caucasus. A total of 10 species are recognized, mainly
diff ering in minor features of the forcipular coxosternite and the arrangement
of sternal and coxal pores: C. carinthiacus (Latzel, 1880) n. stat.; C. caucasicus
(Selivanov, 1884) n. comb. formerly Geophilus caucasicus; C. escherichii (Verhoeff ,
1896); C. fl avidus C. L. Koch, 1847; C. intermedius Dărăbanţu & Matic, 1969;
C. latisternus (Attems, 1947) n. comb. from Pleurogeophilus latisternus; C. rodnaensis
(Verhoeff , 1938); C. skopljensis (Verhoeff , 1938); C. verhoeffi n. nom. (for Geophilus fl avidus porosus Verhoeff , 1934); C. vesubiensis n. sp., Geophilus lindbergi (Loksa,
1971), n. comb. formerly Clinopodes lindbergi, is demonstrated to have been
classifi ed erroneously under Clinopodes. Clinopodes vesubiensis n. sp. is described
from a limited area in the southern Maritime Alps, at the western border of the
entire range of the genus, and disjunct from the morphologically closest species
C. carinthiacus, suggesting that the history of diff erentiation and colonization of
the genus within the Alps has been more complex than previously thought
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
