1,720,957 research outputs found

    Iconography of fear German images of Tatars in change: barbarians, allies, migrants

    No full text
    1.1. Einleitung 1.2. Aufbau 1.3. Zielstellung 1.4. Hypothese 1.4.1. Forschungsdesign und Methodik 1.5. "Tatarenbild" und Stereotypenforschung 1.5.1. Erinnerungsorte und "lange Dauer" (longue durée) 1.6. Forschungsstand 1.7. Begriffsdiskurse Tataren und Ethnizität 1.7.1. Deutschsprachige Gebiete, Deutsche Literatur 1.7.2. Europa, Tartarei, Ost-Mitteleuropa 1.7.3. Semantik, Konnotation, Assoziation 1.8. Relevanz des Untersuchungsgegenstandes 1.8.1. Gesellschaftspolitische Relevanz 1.8.2. Wissenschaftliche Relevanz 2\. (Vor-)Geschichte und Ursprünge. Ethnogenese oder Ethnisierung? 2.1. Europäische Tatarenbilder. Erste Kontakte 2.1.1. Tatern, Tottern, Dadern - Zigeuner oder Tataren? 2.1.2. „Serenissimo Muradun Gerey…“ Preußisch- tatarische Beziehungen 3\. Ikonografie der Angst: Tatarenbilder 3.1. Belletristik 3.1.1. Barbaren aus dem Osten. Trivialliteratur und Comics 3.1.1.1. Buchcover und Illustrationen 3.1.2. Reiter, Liebhaber, Retter. Romane und Erzählungen 3.1.2.1. Im Land der Freunde: Tatarenliteratur in der DDR 3.1.2.2. Auf der anderem Seite: Emigrantenliteratur in der BRD 3.1.3. Kinder- und Jugendliteratur 3.1.3.1. Fantasy und Science Fiction 3.1.4. Heimkehrer- Literatur 3.1.5. Vertriebenen-Literaur / Aussiedlerliteratur 3.1.5.1. Das Erbe Ostpreußens und Schlesiens: Sagen und Erinnerung 3.1.5.2. Von Konfrontation zu Akkulturation. Dobrudscha-Deutsche und Tataren 3.1.6. Sekundärstereotype: Tartarennachricht und Hacksteak Tartar 3.1.7. Auf dem Weg ins 21. Jahrhundert 3.2. Tatarisches Erbe? Ethnonyme in der Toponymie 3.2.1. Forschungsstand und Materialsuche im Kontext von Toponymie / Onomastik 3.2.2. Differenzierung und Kategorisierung 3.2.2.1. Morphologische Typen / Etymologie 3.2.2.2. Topografie und Isogenie 3.2.2.3. Narrative Differenz: Zigeuner und Tataren 3.2.2.4. Toponyme ohne BW TaRtAr- 4\. Fazit und Ausblick 4.1. Tatarenbilder von gestern – Feindbilder von heute? Danksagung 5\. Anhang 5.1. LiteraturverzeichnisDie vorliegende Forschungsarbeit behandelt das meist negative Bild von Tataren, welches sich - trotz regional begrenzter deutsch-tatarischer Integration (Baltikum, Dobrudscha) - als Narrativ im kulturellen Gedächtnis der Deutschen festsetzte und erst im 20. Jahrhundert einen zaghaften Wandel erfuhr. Sie zeigt, wie die rezente Entwicklung des Tatarenbildes auf historischen Konstanten imaginierter Fremd- und Selbstzuschreibungen basiert. Diesen Fragen wird anhand von Forschungen zum Tatarenbild der Deutschen in Mitteleuropa als ´fernen´ Nachbarn der Tataren nachgegangen. Berücksichtigt werden die Tataren-Images in der deutschen Literatur, im Bereich Onomastik und Kulturgeschichte (Sekundärstereotypen). Die Entwicklungen in diesem Kontext werden ausführlich für den Zeitraum vom Anfang des 19. Jahrhunderts bis heute untersucht, da diese Zeit gekennzeichnet ist von Brüchen und Entwicklungen im tatarischen Selbstverständnis und der Sichtweise Anderer auf diese Ethnie, die für die Untersuchung relevant sind: In den drei Phasen der zaristischen (A), sowjetischen (B) und post-sowjetischen (C) Epochen zählen dazu etwa die Zeit der Napoleonischen Kriege, das Aufkommen der Phänomene Nationalismus, Panturkismus und Djaddīdismus Ende des 19. Jh., die Revolution 1917, der Verdrängung bzw. Umdeutung dieser Konzepte durch die bolschewistische Ideologie sowie das Ende der Sowjetherrschaft Anfang der 1990er Jahre einhergehend mit einer rasanten Renaissance von Djaddīdismus sowie russischen und tatarischen Nationalismen.The present study deals with the mostly negative image of Tatars, which - despite the regionally limited German-Tatarian integration (Baltikum, Dobrudja) - was a narrative in the cultural memory of the Germans and experienced a tentative change only in the 20th century. It shows how the recent development of the Tatar image is based on historical constants of imagined foreign and self-attestations. These questions are investigated by means of researches on the Tatar picture of the Germans in Central Europe as 'remote' neighbors of the Tatars. Tatar images are taken into account in German literature, in the area of onomastics and in the cultural history (secondary stereotypes)

    Tatar-Prussian Connections in the 17th and 18th Centuries: The History of a Relationship

    Full text link
    The history of the Tatar soldiers in the armies of Prussia and Saxony has hitherto only rarely been the subject of scholarly publications, but it offers a useful starting point for illuminating Christian-Islamic relations in the 17th and 18th centuries. Tatar soldiers were to be found in the Bosniak, Hussar, Cossack and Towarczys units of the Prussian and Saxon Army as well as in the short-lived Tatar Pulk of the Prussian army. At the same time diplomatic exchanges took place between Lipka Tatars, Crimean Tatars, Prussians and Saxons, beginning in the 15th century and lasting until 1786. A Tatar Muslim population has resided in the geographic center of Europe – in Lithuania and Poland – for more than 600 years. Its presence probably also shaped the distinctive collective image of this ethnic group formed by its German neighbors, the inhabitants of the former East Prussia, Masovia, Kujawia, Silesia and West Prussia.The history of the Tatar soldiers in the armies of Prussia and Saxony has hitherto only rarely been the subject of scholarly publications, but it offers a useful starting point for illuminating Christian-Islamic relations in the 17th and 18th centuries. Tatar soldiers were to be found in the Bosniak, Hussar, Cossack and Towarczys units of the Prussian and Saxon Army as well as in the short-lived Tatar Pulk of the Prussian army. At the same time diplomatic exchanges took place between Lipka Tatars, Crimean Tatars, Prussians and Saxons, beginning in the 15th century and lasting until 1786. A Tatar Muslim population has resided in the geographic center of Europe – in Lithuania and Poland – for more than 600 years. Its presence probably also shaped the distinctive collective image of this ethnic group formed by its German neighbors, the inhabitants of the former East Prussia, Masovia, Kujawia, Silesia and West Prussia

    Yazma Miras / Written Heritage: The Image of the Polish-Lithuanian Tatars as a Transferred Stereotype in German Literature

    Full text link
    If we look at the subject of Islam and Eastern Europe in the context of the literatures of our countries, we encounter two paradoxes. On the one hand, there are two long-distance literatures that conveyed via translation narratives about Islam of the East into German literature. This is the Russian and Tatar literature. On the other hand, there are the near-distance literatures, e.g. the Polish and Lithuanian literature, as well as in earlier times the German literature of the Baltics and Silesia. The following paradox seems worth investigating in this literary paradigm: while Tatar literature would have been able to mirror a real picture of Tatar Islam, German literature has instead used almost exclusively narratives from Russian literature, often with a corresponding pejorative connotation. On the other hand, texts dealing with autochthonous Islam in Poland- Lithuania are very rarely translated into the German language. Nevertheless, there is literature in German in this context. However, it is not written by Polish-Lithuanian Tatar, but written by German authors about them. In this article, we will concentrate on the following topics: the culture translations in texts from long-distance literatures of the Russians, shortdistance literature translations from Polish and Lithuanian literature into German and the literatures originally written in German, e.g. Silesia, East Prussia and in today’s Germany concerning Tatars of Poland-Lithuania. The text highlights these phenomena as an overview and is not complete and comprehensive, but representative enough to indicate what the subject of transferred Tatar stereotypes is all about.Mieste HOTOPP-RIECKE - Institute for Caucasica, Tatarica and Turkestan Studies. GermanyStephan THEILIG - Institute for Caucasica, Tatarica and Turkestan Studies. Germany13715

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore