171,422 research outputs found
Nooit meer vechten? Beschaving, technologie en toepassing van militair geweld 's-Gravenhage:St. Maatschappij en Krijgsmacht ,1997
No full textContains fulltext :
91091.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)C. Homan Nooit meer vechten? Beschaving, technologie en toepassing van militair geweld 's-Gravenhage:St. Maatschappij en Krijgsmacht ,199
Code for: Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2022) An Intersectional Lens on Leadership: Prescriptive Stereotypes towards Younger Women and Younger Men and their Effect on Leadership Perception
No full textYounger men and especially younger women are excluded from leadership roles or obstructed from succeeding in these positions by facing backlash. Our project aims to build a more gender-specific understanding of the backlash that younger individuals in leadership positions face. We predict an interactive backlash for younger women and younger men that is rooted in intersectional stereotypes compared to the stereotypes based on single demographic categories (i.e., age or gender stereotypes). To test our hypotheses, we collect data from a heterogeneous sample (N = 900) of U.S. citizens between 25 and 69 years. We conduct an experimental online study with a between-participant design to examine the backlash against younger women and younger men.Code for: Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2022). An Intersectional Lens on Leadership: Prescriptive Stereotypes towards Younger Women and Younger Men and their Effect on Leadership Perception. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5404Code for: Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2023). An intersectional lens on young leaders: bias toward young women and young men in leadership positions. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 14). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204547Research has recognized age biases against young leaders, yet understanding of how gender, the most frequently studied demographic leader characteristic, influences this bias remains limited. In this study, we examine the gender-specific age bias toward young female and young male leaders through an intersectional lens. By integrating intersectionality theory with insights on status beliefs associated with age and gender, we test whether young female and male leaders face an interactive rather than an additive form of bias. We conducted two preregistered experimental studies (N1 = 918 and N2 = 985), where participants evaluated leaders based on age, gender, or a combination of both. Our analysis reveals a negative age bias in leader status ascriptions toward young leaders compared to middle-aged and older leaders. This bias persists when gender information is added, as demonstrated in both intersectional categories of young female and young male leaders. This bias pattern does not extend to middle-aged or older female and male leaders, thereby supporting the age bias against young leaders specifically. Interestingly, we also examined whether social dominance orientation strengthens the bias against young (male) leaders, but our results (reported in the SOM) are not as hypothesized. In sum, our results emphasize the importance of young age as a crucial demographic characteristic in leadership perceptions that can even overshadow the role of gender.unknownunknow
Dataset for: Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2022) An Intersectional Lens on Leadership: Prescriptive Stereotypes towards Younger Women and Younger Men and their Effect on Leadership Perception
No full textYounger men and especially younger women are excluded from leadership roles or obstructed from succeeding in these positions by facing backlash. Our project aims to build a more gender-specific understanding of the backlash that younger individuals in leadership positions face. We predict an interactive backlash for younger women and younger men that is rooted in intersectional stereotypes compared to the stereotypes based on single demographic categories (i.e., age or gender stereotypes). To test our hypotheses, we collect data from a heterogeneous sample (N = 900) of U.S. citizens between 25 and 69 years. We conduct an experimental online study with a between-participant design to examine the backlash against younger women and younger men.Dataset for: Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2022). An Intersectional Lens on Leadership: Prescriptive Stereotypes towards Younger Women and Younger Men and their Effect on Leadership Perception. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5404Dataset for: Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2023). An intersectional lens on young leaders: bias toward young women and young men in leadership positions. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 14). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.120454Research has recognized age biases against young leaders, yet understanding of how gender, the most frequently studied demographic leader characteristic, influences this bias remains limited. In this study, we examine the gender-specific age bias toward young female and young male leaders through an intersectional lens. By integrating intersectionality theory with insights on status beliefs associated with age and gender, we test whether young female and male leaders face an interactive rather than an additive form of bias. We conducted two preregistered experimental studies (N1 = 918 and N2 = 985), where participants evaluated leaders based on age, gender, or a combination of both. Our analysis reveals a negative age bias in leader status ascriptions toward young leaders compared to middle-aged and older leaders. This bias persists when gender information is added, as demonstrated in both intersectional categories of young female and young male leaders. This bias pattern does not extend to middle-aged or older female and male leaders, thereby supporting the age bias against young leaders specifically. Interestingly, we also examined whether social dominance orientation strengthens the bias against young (male) leaders, but our results (reported in the SOM) are not as hypothesized. In sum, our results emphasize the importance of young age as a crucial demographic characteristic in leadership perceptions that can even overshadow the role of gender.unknow
sj-docx-1-sgr-10.1177_10464964241228547 – Supplemental material for Anxious to Perform: Compositional Effects of Negative Task-Related Emotions in Teams
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-sgr-10.1177_10464964241228547 for Anxious to Perform: Compositional Effects of Negative Task-Related Emotions in Teams by Marc W. Heerdink and Astrid C. Homan in Small Group Research</p
Integrated pest management for beef cattle on western ranges
No full textBulletin no. 702 [Moscow, Idaho] :Cooperative Extension Service, University of Idaho, College of Agriculture,[1989] Robert L. Stoltz, Garrett C. Wright and Hugh W. Homan. 26 p. :col. ill. ;28 cm. Cover title
sj-docx-1-hsb-10.1177_00221465231194043 – Supplemental material for Structural Sexism and Preventive Health Care Use in the United States
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-hsb-10.1177_00221465231194043 for Structural Sexism and Preventive Health Care Use in the United States by Emily C. Dore, Surbhi Shrivastava and Patricia Homan in Journal of Health and Social Behavior</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
An Intersectional Lens on Leadership: Prescriptive Stereotypes towards Younger Women and Younger Men and their Effect on Leadership Perception
No full textYounger men and especially younger women are excluded from leadership roles or obstructed from succeeding in these positions by facing backlash. Our project aims to build a more gender-specific understanding of the backlash that younger individuals in leadership positions face. We predict an interactive backlash for younger women and younger men that is rooted in intersectional stereotypes compared to the stereotypes based on single demographic categories (i.e., age or gender stereotypes). To test our hypotheses, we collect data from a heterogeneous sample (N = 900) of U.S. citizens between 25 and 69 years. We conduct an experimental online study with a between-participant design to examine the backlash against younger women and younger men.This is a preregistration of the article: Daldrop, C., Buengeler, C., & Homan, A. C. (2023). An intersectional lens on young leaders: bias toward young women and young men in leadership positions. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 14). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204547unknownothe
Glucose turnover in presence of changing glucose concentrations: error analysis for glucose disappearance.
No full textThe present studies were undertaken to determine whether 1) the cold- and hot-GINF techniques used with Steele's model provide equivalent estimates of the rates of glucose appearance (R(a)) and disappearance (R(d)) in the presence of physiological changes in glucose and insulin concentrations, 2) the conditions for the best estimation of R(a) are the same as those for R(d), 3) the magnitude of error (if present) differs in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, and 4) situations exist in which the knowledge of R(d) allows inferences to be made on whole body glucose uptake. To do so we performed experiments in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic subjects using simultaneous infusions of [6-3H]glucose and [6-14C]glucose; glucose and insulin were infused to mimic normal postprandial glucose and insulin profiles; the infused glucose contained [6-14C]glucose but not [6-3H]glucose. Compared with the hot-GINF method, the traditional cold-GINF method underestimated (P < 0.05) R(a) and R(d) by 10-15% and hepatic glucose release by 25-50% during the 1st h of the study, with the magnitude of error being the same in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Error analysis demonstrated that errors in R(a) and R(d) have different analytic expressions containing common structural but different volume errors. Both R(a) and R(d) can be accurately measured in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects if glucose specific activity is kept constant and the volume of the accessible pool is used to calculate glucose disappearance. The relationship between R(d) and whole body glucose uptake was also derived. Although R(d) can be determined by relying on measurements in the accessible pool only, the assessment of whole body glucose uptake requires a model of the nonaccessible portion of the glucose system. However, knowledge of R(d) can provide useful insights into the behavior of whole body glucose uptake
- …
