1,720,990 research outputs found
Exploration of relationships between claw disorders and milk yield in Holstein cows via recursive linear and threshold models
No full textRelationships between claw disorders and test-day milk yield recorded in 2005 on 5,360 Holstein cows, kept on 11 large-scale dairy farms in eastern Germany, were analyzed in a Bayesian framework with standard linear and threshold models and recursive linear and threshold models. Four different claw disorders, digital dermatitis (DD), sole ulcer (SU), wall disorder (WD), and interdigital hyperplasia (IH), were scored as binary traits within 200 d after calving and analyzed separately. Incidences of disorders were 13.7% for DD, 16.5% for SU, 9.8% for WD, and 6.7% for IH. Heritabilities of disorders were greater when applying threshold or recursive threshold models than with linear or linear recursive models. Posterior means of genetic correlations between test- day milk production and claw disorders ranged from 0.17 to 0.44, suggesting that breeding strategies focusing on increased milk yield will increase incidences of disorders as a correlated response. A progressive path of lagged relationships was postulated for recursive models describing first the influence of test- day milk yield (MY1) on claw disorders and second, the effect of the disorder on milk production level at the following test day (MY2). In recursive models, structural coefficients describe recursive relationships at the phenotypic level. The structural coefficient lambda(21) was the gradient of disease (trait 2) with respect to MY1 (trait 1) for a model with a recursive effect of trait 1 on trait 2. The increase of disease incidence of the 4 different disorders per 1-kg increase of MY1 ranged from lambda(21)= 0.006 to lambda(21)= 0.024 on the visible scale when applying recursive linear models, and from lambda(21)= 0.003 to lambda(21)= 0.016 on the underlying liability scale for recursive threshold models. The rate of change in MY2 (trait 3) with respect to the previous claw disorder is given by lambda(32) for a model with a recursive effect from trait 2 to trait 3. Structural coefficients lambda(32) ranged from -0.12 to -0.68 predicting that a 1-unit increase in the incidence of any disorder reduces milk yield at the following test day by up to 0.67 kg. Rank correlations between sire posterior means for the same claw disorders among different models were >0.84, but some changes in rank of sires in distinct top-10 lists were observed. Structural equation models are of increasing importance in genetic evaluations, and this study showed the possible application of recursive systems, even for categorical data
A comparison of principal component regression and genomic REML for genomic prediction across populations
No full textBackground: Genomic prediction faces two main statistical problems: multicollinearity and n ≪ p (many fewer observations than predictor variables). Principal component (PC) analysis is a multivariate statistical method that is often used to address these problems. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of PC regression (PCR) for genomic prediction with that of a commonly used REML model with a genomic relationship matrix (GREML) and to investigate the full potential of PCR for genomic prediction. Methods: The PCR model used either a common or a semi-supervised approach, where PC were selected based either on their eigenvalues (i.e. proportion of variance explained by SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) genotypes) or on their association with phenotypic variance in the reference population (i.e. the regression sum of squares contribution). Cross-validation within the reference population was used to select the optimum PCR model that minimizes mean squared error. Pre-corrected average daily milk, fat and protein yields of 1609 first lactation Holstein heifers, from Ireland, UK, the Netherlands and Sweden, which were genotyped with 50 k SNPs, were analysed. Each testing subset included animals from only one country, or from only one selection line for the UK. Results: In general, accuracies of GREML and PCR were similar but GREML slightly outperformed PCR. Inclusion of genotyping information of validation animals into model training (semi-supervised PCR), did not result in more accurate genomic predictions. The highest achievable PCR accuracies were obtained across a wide range of numbers of PC fitted in the regression (from one to more than 1000), across test populations and traits. Using cross-validation within the reference population to derive the number of PC, yielded substantially lower accuracies than the highest achievable accuracies obtained across all possible numbers of PC. Conclusions: On average, PCR performed only slightly less well than GREML. When the optimal number of PC was determined based on realized accuracy in the testing population, PCR showed a higher potential in terms of achievable accuracy that was not capitalized when PC selection was based on cross-validation. A standard approach for selecting the optimal set of PC in PCR remains a challenge
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
