1,720,959 research outputs found
Bahasa Arab Standard (Antara Âmmiyyah dan Fushah)
Arabic Fusha is a language that is maintained and in principle same as Arabic which is used in the time of Jahiliya and the beginning of Islam. Whereas Arabic Amiya is Arabic has undergone many changes from the form of the Fusha, both from the aspect of vocabulary and structure. At the end of the 19th century there was an appeal to use Arabic Amiya as an oral and written language. The reason is because it is used by the Arab community in general and because of its simple form and structure. On the other hand, there are many defenders of Arabic Fusha who offer a number of weaknesses in Arabic Amiya as the reason for their rejection. In fact, both types of Arabic language still exist in Arabic society with their respective functions
Nahwu dan Tafsir dalam Karya Ulama Klasik
Artikel ini menjelaskan dua tipologi karya ulama klasik yang berhubungan dengan nahwu dan tafsir. Jenis pertama adalah kitab nah}wu yang dalam penjelasan materinya selalu melibatkan ayat-ayat Alquran, baik sebagai dalil untuk kaidahnya maupun penjelasan untuk maksud kaidah tersebut. Model ini bisa dilihat dalam kitab I’rab al-Qur’an karya al-Zajjaj (w. 316 H). Sedangkan jenis kedua, merupakan kitab tafsir yang dalam banyak penjelasannya melibatkan analisis aspek bahasa terutama nahwu. Model ini dapat dilihat dalam dua kitab tafsir klasik yang mu’tabar, yaitu Tafsir al-Tabariy karya Ibnu Jarir al-Tabariy (lahir 224 H), dan kitab tafsir al-Kasysyaf karya Imam Zamakhsyari (lahir 467 H). Model pertama diistilahkan dengan nahwu-tafsiriy, dan yang kedua disebut tafsir-nahwiy atau tafsir-lugawiy
Bahasa Arab Pra-Islam
كانت اللغة العربية عاشت منذ زمان طويل وانحدرت من لغة أسبق منها. وتلك اللغة هي التى اختلف فيها اللغويون والمؤرخون هل من هذه أو من تلك. ومن خلال هذا البحث الوجيز تقدم الكاتبة رأيا يؤيد أن اللغة العربية قريبة العلاقة باللغة السامية الأم. وهي منحدرة من إحدى فريقيها القديمة أي العربية الباقية، حيث ماتت وزالت الأخرى إلا ما وجدت فى النقوش المكتوبة. شرح البحث أيضا أحوال اللغة العربية قبل مجيئ الإسلام من مفرداتها وجملها واستخدامها فى مجتمع العرب.
 
Al-Rabṭ dalam Tinjauan Struktur Dan Makna
فى العربية مصطلحان استخدما للتعبير عن العلاقة بين الكلمة والكلمة الأخرى أو الجملة والجملة الأخرى، هما الربط والارتباط. وقد جرى الاختلاف بين اللغويين فى تعريف هذين المصطلحين، حيث يرى البعض أنهما مختلفان. منهم مصطفى حميدة بقوله إن الربط علاقة سياقية نحوية بين العنصرين أو أكثر فى الجملة بأداة معينة أو الضمير، وأما الارتباط عنده فهو علاقة نحوية سياقية بين المعنيين فى الجملة بدون واسطة أو حرف. ويرى البعض الآخر أنهما متساويان ولا يختلفان فى الذاتية. منهم تمام حسان بذكر المصطلح الواحد فى التعبير عن العلاقة بين العناصر فى الجملة إما بأداة أو حرف وإما بدونها. هذه العلاقة تتضح فى الجمل العربية بثلاثة أشكال، وهي الإحالة والمطابقة والأداة. فالإحالة تكرار الكلمة أو الجملة لفظا أو معنى. وأما المطابقة فهي ما عناه مصطفى حميدة بمصطلح الارتباط أي علاقة مباشرة بين الكلمات فى الجملة بدون حرف أو أداة معينة لمطابقة العناصر فيها من الخطاب أو التذكير والتأنيث أو الإفراد والتثنية والجمع أو النكرة والمعرفة أو الإعراب. فالأداة هي ما ذكره الآخر بمصطلح الربط، أي علاقة بين العناصر فى الجملة بأداة معينة مثل حرف الجر أو العطف أو الشرط وغيرها
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
