1,720,956 research outputs found
Does Gender Matter? An Interview Study on Gender Representation in Software Systems
[Context and Motivation] Inclusivity is a term that
is widely used today. If you look the word up in a dictionary,
it will say something along the lines of ’treating everyone fairly
and equally’. How do we then make our software inclusive? And
specifically, how do we make our software inclusive to people
of different genders? [Question/problem] This bachelor’s thesis
aims to research the role of gender in software through an
interview study. Current research in this area is scarce, and it
is therefore in our interest to understand where gender matters
in software systems, where it can be avoided, and how we make
our systems more gender-inclusive. Another important point of
view that this thesis covers is how non-binary people are being
represented in different software systems. [Principal Ideas/results]
Through thematic coding, the results of the study presented
various themes related to gender representation in software. The
themes managed to answer the research questions about what
the state of practice is with representing gender in software, and
what experiences non-binary people have with being represented
in software systems. [Contribution] It is concluded that it is
important that software engineers take the issues of gender
representation seriously. Often this means to not even register
a user’s gender in the first place, as many of the interviewees
stated that it is not necessary. When it is relevant to register
gender, it should be done in such a way that includes more than
the binary male and female options to make sure that people
of various gender identities feel included and welcomed in the
digital world
How Users Perceive the Representation of Non-binary Gender in Software Systems: An Interview Study
Improving Artificial Intelligence Through User Feedback in eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Systems - Design Recommendations for Sustaining Long-Term Human- XAI Interaction in Industry 4.0
This thesis explores Human-XAI interaction and the vital role of user motivation in providing feedback to XAI systems in industrial settings, focusing on the design of Incremental Explanatory Training (IET) components that enable feedback. A welladjusted XAI interface is necessary for feedback provision and in turn, the feedback is used to improve the accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence. Drawing from the interdisciplinary field of XAI, the industry 4.0 context, and User-Centered Design (UCD) practices, it investigates the motivations required for sustained user engagement, identifies interface components that enhance feedback provision, and offers design recommendations for optimizing the user experience and sustaining motivation for feedback provision. This research addresses three key questions: 1) the types of motivations necessary for user feedback, 2) the interface components fostering motivation, and 3) design recommendations for effective feedback mechanisms adhering to motivation. As a result of this research, it was shown that both extrinsic and intrinsic motivations are necessary to encourage sustained feedback provision and that interface components with XAI improvement statistics and effective interaction modalities are vital for fostering motivation. Eight design recommendations were identified that offer generalized insights into important considerations for IET components to contribute to sustained motivation and user engagement for feedback provision
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
