35 research outputs found
??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ??????: ????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????????
No full text??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ?????
??????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?????????. ???? ???
????? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ??????
????? ??????? ??? ???????? )?1137??/1715?( ???????? ?????????
??????? ???????? ?????? ???????? ????? ???????? ????? ????? ??????? ??
???????? ???????? ??????. ???? ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????????
??? ?????? ??????? ?????? ??? ????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ???????
????????. ??????? ???? ?????? ???????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ????????
??? ?????? ???? ????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??????????
????????. ??? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ??? ????????? ??????? ???????? ????????
?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???. ????? ????????
??? ??? ?? ???? ???????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ????? ??????? ?????? ??
???? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ????????? ???? ??????? ???????? ??????? ??
?? ??????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ???????
??? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ??
??????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ???????
No full text??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ????? ??????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ????????
???????? ?????????. ???? ??? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ????????
???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ???????. ???? ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ?????????
??????. ??? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ??????? ????? ???? ???? ????????? ??? ??? ???????? ??
??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ??????? ??????. ???? ??????? ???
??????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??? ??????? ??????. ????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ??????
?????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ???. ???? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ??? ??????
??????? ?? ????? ??? ????? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ????. ????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??
???????? ?????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ???????
????????. ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??? ???????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ??????? ?????? ??? ?????
?????? ??????? ????? ?????? ??? ???
??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ??????: ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ?????
No full textThis research aims to define Tafsir Sufi Ishari and Tafsir Al Bahr Al-Madid by Ibn Ajibah (1809). The research as well will extrapolate Tafsir Sufi Ishari for Quranic verses in the book which related to the issue of the heart purification. The methodology for this research in analyzing information depends on the descriptive approach, and on collecting all facts and information. It also uses the analytical and criticism approach by matching the scholarly conditions of acceptance regarding Tafsir Sufi Ishari with what was interpreted by Ibn Al- Ajibah. Then compare, evaluate and criticize it. Therefore, the findings indicate that the Tafsir Sufi Ishari - which is One of the types of the Quranic exegesis based on interpretations of verses contrast the classical commentaries by Ibn Ajibah in the issue of the heart purification that matching the conditions were based on two foundations. Firstly: The Tafsir Sufi Ishari was interpreted accordingly to general verses\u27 meaning and exegesis. Secondly: The relationship between Tafsir Sufi Ishari to al-Ma\u27thur is like the relationship between cause and effect. The study also revealed that the contraditions with conditions in Tafsir Sufi Ishari in this issue are based on three foundations. Firstly: The interpretations of Ibn Ajibah were so far from the common use of Arabic understanding. Secondly: The interpretations made were analogous compared to other normal exegesis. Thirdly: to generalize some issues which are strictly individuals. In fact, if Ibn Ajibah limited his interpretation to his Ishari views there is no differences between him and the doctrine of Shiites Batiniyyah!, But our trust in his scholarly Tafsir, his confirmation of classical interpretation and his condemnation of Batiniyyah understanding make his Tafsir Ishari valid and well concerned
Konsep integrasi ilmu Naqli dan Aqli dan perbandingannya dengan Islamisasi
No full textPeradaban dan tamadun yang dibina pada zaman moden ini adalah berasaskan kepada pengasingan antara ilmu Naqli dan Aqli. Ia adalah kesan daripada pengaruh Barat yang memencilkan ilmu Naqli daripada menjadi rujukan dan panduan dalam kehidupan duniawi yang berasaskan akal. Implikasi kepada pengasingan ini membawa kepada pelbagai gejala sosial dan jenayah. Dalam menangani isu ini, konsep integrasi ilmu Naqli dan Aqli (iNaQ) dan Islamisasi diperkenalkan dalam sistem pendidikan negara. Justeru, kajian ini adalah untuk menerangkan konsep iNaQ dan perbandingannya dengan Islamisasi. Kajian ini mengguna pakai pendekatan kualitatif iaitu melalui kaedah analisis dokumen. Dapatan kajian ini telah menghasilkan kefahaman tentang konsep iNaQ dan perbezaannya dengan Islamisasi. Ia diharapkan dapat membangunkan sumber manusia yang seimbang dalam sistem pendidikan negara dan menghasilkan nilai kepada negara, ummah dan manusia sejagat
Wild speculations on the missing flight MH370: balancing online expression and content regulation in Malaysia / Mahyuddin Daud
No full textA recent incident on disappearance of Malaysia Airlines (MAS) flight MH370 has broken billion hearts of people around the world. Joint international investigations have confirmed that the flight has ended in the middle of South Indian Ocean. However, till the day this work is written, no sign of wreckage, dead bodies or any shred of evidence could be found to provide an answer thus inviting wild speculations to the incident. Wild speculations on plane hijacking, suicide, terrorism acts and more can easily be found online despite threats by the authorities not to speculate. In this regard, the author recalls the right to freedom of expression (FOE) - which has been long recognised by international treaties. Accordingly, FOE has been expanded to include online expressions. New technology allows Internet content to be created without the need for approval from an editor – like in print media. This could invite creation of problematic content (such as speculations on MH370) and often led to intermediary liability of webmasters and service providers. Therefore, this paper seeks to address on 3 significant points. Firstly, a brief problem statement on MH370 incident and surrounding legal risks caused by wild speculations shall be addressed. Secondly, the author will discuss current legal positions on digital right to FOE vis-a-vis Internet content regulation in Malaysia focusing on online speculations. Finally, the author will provide suggestions to balance between rights to digital expression and Internet content regulation with the view on minimising online risks to netizens
??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ???????: ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ?????
No full text??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ????? ??????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?????????. ???? ??? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???? ????? ?????? ? ??????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ???????? ???? ???????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????. ???? ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ????????? ??? ?????? ??????. ??????? ???? ?????? ???????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ???????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???? ????????. ??? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ??? ????????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???. ????? ???????? ??? ??? ?? ???? ???????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ??? ??? ??????? ????????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ????????? ???? ??????? ???? ????? ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ???????
التفسير الصوفي الإشاري ومقارنته بتفسير الإسماعيلية الباطنية والتفسير الصوفي النظري والتفسير العلمي الإشاري: [Tafsir Sufi Ishari and its Comparison with Tafsir al-Batiniah, Tafsir Sufi of Philosophy and Tafsir Scientific Ishari]
No full textTafsir Sufi al-Isyari is the commentary related to the implied symbol behind the utterance of the Quran and not the explicit meanings. The purpose of this research is to define Tafsir Sufi al-Isyari and compare it with Tafsir Batiniah, Tafsir Sufi of Philosophy, and Tafsir Scientific Ishari. The researcher used comparison and critic methods to conduct this research. As a result, the opinion of Sufism experts about Tafsir Sufi al-Isyari is different with the exegesis of the Quran by Batiniah’s group. This is because, Batiniah’s group did not acknowledge outwardly of the Quran but they only acknowledge inwardly. Hence, they interpret the Quran internally by their bad intentions. However, Sufism expert recognize the outwardly of the Quran as they recognize the internal of the Quran. Moreover, this research also found that Tafsir Sufi of Philosophy is built by premise of philosophy that contain in the mind of Sufi at the early stage, then the Quranic verses is stated after that. As for Tafsir Sufi al-Isyari is not related to premise of philosophy, but it is related to the spiritual training which are performed by Sufi members. Besides that, Tafsir Scientific al-Isyari is the interpretation that contain signals related to the nature that can be found in the al-Quran. It is also the interpretation by symbol of modern knowledge and new discoveries. In contrast with Tafsir Sufi al-Isyari, it is the interpretation by hidden symbol that comes from the heart of righteousness, kindness and knowledge during recitation of the Quran.
التفسير الصوفي الإشاري هو التفسير الذي يعتمد على استبطان خفايا الألفاظ دون توقف عند حدود ظواهرها المألوفة ومعانيها القاموسية. يهدف هذا البحث إلى تعريف التفسير الصوفي الإشاري ومقارنته بتفسير الإسماعيلية الباطنية والتفسير الصوفي النظري والتفسير العلمي الإشاري. وأما منهج هذه الدراسة فيعتمد على منهج المقارن والتحليلي النقدي. ومن نتائج هذه الدراسة أن التفسير الإشاري عند الصوفية يختلف فيما يراه الباطنية، ذلك لأن الباطنية لم يعترفوا بظاهر القرآن واعترفوا بالباطن فقط، وتعمدوا أن يفسروا الباطن على ما يتفق نواياهم السيئة. وأما الصوفية فقد اعترفوا بظاهر القرآن ولم يجحدوه، كما اعترفوا بباطنه. وبينت الدراسة أن التفسير الصوفي النظري ينبني على مقدمات فلسفية تنقدح في ذهن الصوفي أولا، ثم يُنزل القرآن عليها بعد ذلك. وأما التفسير الإشاري فلا يرتكز على مقدمات فلسفية، بل يرتكز على رياضة روحية يأخذ بها الصوفي نفسه. وكشفت الدراسة أن التفسير العلمي الإشاري هو الإشارات الجلية التي تتضمنها الآيات الكونية في القرآن الكريم والتي تشير إشارات واضحة إلى كثير من العلوم الحديثة الاكتشاف. وأما التفسير الصوفي الإشاري فهو الإشارات الخفية التي يدركها أهل التقوى والصلاح والعلم عند تلاوة القرآن الكريم، فتكون مواجيد لها معان
Wild speculations on the missing flight MH370: balancing online expression and content regulation in Malaysia
No full textA recent incident on the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines (MAS) flight MH370 has broken the hearts of
people around the world. Joint international investigations have confirmed that the flight ended in the middle
of the South Indian Ocean. However, till the day this work is written, no sign of wreckage, dead bodies or any
shred of evidence could be found to provide an answer, thus inviting wild speculations to the incident. Wild
speculations on plane hijacking, suicide, terrorism acts and more can easily be found online despite
warnings by the authorities not to speculate. In this regard, the author recalls the right to freedom of
expression (FOE) â which has been long recognised by international treaties. Accordingly, FOE has been
expanded to include online expressions. New technology allows Internet content to be created without the
need for approval from an editor â like in print media. This could invite the creation of problematic content
(such as speculations on MH370) and often leads to intermediary liability of webmasters and service
providers. Therefore, this paper seeks to address three significant points. Firstly, a brief problem statement
on the MH370 incident and surrounding legal risks caused by wild speculations shall be addressed.
Secondly, the author will discuss current legal positions on digital right to FOE vis-a-vis Internet content
regulation in Malaysia focusing on online speculations. Finally, the author will provide suggestions to balance
between rights to digital expression and Internet content regulation with the view on minimising online risks
to netizens
