1,720,961 research outputs found
Isu-isu fiqh yang tidak muktamad menurut mazhab shafi'i dalam kitab al-sirat al-mustaqim karya Shaykh Nur al-din al-raniri
No full textArtikel ini merupakan analisis terhadap isu-isu fiqh yang tidak muktamad menurut Mazhab Shafi'i dalam penulisan kitab al-Sirat al-Mustaqim karya Shaykh Nur al-bin al-Raniri. Kitab al-Sirat al-Mustaqim merupakan kitab fiqh berbahasa Melayu yang pertama dikarang di Nusantara. la ditulis berdasarkan rujukan-rujukan fiqh Mazhab Shafi'i berbahasa Arab yang berautoriti. Isi kandungannya sewajarnya selari dengan fakta-fakta fiqh yang muktamad dalam Mazhab Shafi'i. Namun begitu, kajian ini mendapab bahawa teks al-Sirat al-Mustaqim mengandungi beberapa pandangan fiqh yang bercanggah dengan pendapat yang muktamad dalam Mazhab Shag'. Pendapat-pendapat fiqh ini bercanggah dengan apa yang diputuskan oleh ulama-ulama peneliti (muhaqqiq) dalam Mazhab Shafi'i yang muta'akhkhirin terutamanya Ibn Hajar al-Haytami dan Shams al-Din al-Ramli. Walau bagaimanapun, ini tidak menggambarkan satu kelemahan penulisan kitab tersebut. Pandangan-pandangan fiqh ini merupakan pandangan fiqh pilihan peribadi pengarang untuk dinyatakan dalam kitab ini. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah analisis tekstual, berdasarkan kepada data-data berbentuk kualitatif yang dikumpulkan berasaskan kepada kaedah kajian dokumentasi
Isu-isu Fiqh yang Tidak Muktamad Menurut Mazhab Shafi’i dalam Kitab al-Sirat al-Mustaqim Karya Shaykh Nur al-Din al-Raniri
Get PDFThis article is a study on the compliance of qawl mu’tamad (ultimate view) to the Shafiite School of thought in the book al-Sirat al-Mustaqim written by Nur al-Din al-Raniri. Al-Sirat al-Mustaqim is the first book on fiqh written in the Malay language in the Malay archipelago. It was written based on authoritative Arabic books from Shafiite School of Thought for reference. The content therefore should be parallel with the fiqh of Shafiite School of Thought. However, this study found that the texts of al-Sirat al-Mustaqim in particular, in the Book of Purification and the Book of Prayers contain a few views that contradict the ultimate opinions or views of the Shafiite School of Thought. Those opinions are in conflict with some verified studies of later Shafiite scholars such as Ibn Hajar al-Haytami and Shams al-Din al-Ramli. Nevertheless, this does not suggest a weakness of this book as these differences of opinions on Islamic Jurisprudence reflect the authors’ personal views. The collected qualitative data in this document study was subjected to textual analysis.Keywords: al-Sirat al-Mustaqim; qawl mu’tamad; Shafiite School of Thoughts. Abstrak Artikel ini merupakan analisis terhadap isu-isu fiqh yang tidak muktamad menurut Mazhab Shafi’i dalam penulisan kitab al-Sirat al-Mustaqim karya Shaykh Nur al- Din al-Raniri. Kitab al-Sirat al-Mustaqim merupakan kitab fiqh berbahasa Melayu yang pertama dikarang di Nusantara. Ia ditulis berdasarkan rujukan-rujukan fiqh Mazhab Shafi’i berbahasa Arab yang berautoriti. Isi kandungannya sewajarnya selari dengan fakta-fakta fiqh yang muktamad dalam Mazhab Shafi’i. Namun begitu, kajian ini mendapati bahawa teks al-Sirat al-Mustaqim mengandungi beberapa pandangan fiqh yang bercanggah dengan pendapat yang muktamad dalam Mazhab Shafi‘i. Pendapat-pendapat fiqh ini bercanggah dengan apa yang diputuskan oleh ulama-ulama peneliti (muhaqqiq) dalam Mazhab Shafi‘i yang muta’akhkhirin terutamanya Ibn Hajar al-Haytami dan Shams al-Din al-Ramli. Walau bagaimanapun, ini tidak menggambarkan satu kelemahan penulisan kitab tersebut. Pandangan-pandangan fiqh ini merupakan pandangan fiqh pilihan peribadi pengarang untuk dinyatakan dalam kitab ini. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah analisis tekstual, berdasarkan kepada data-data berbentuk kualitatif yang dikumpulkan berasaskan kepada kaedah kajian dokumentasi. Kata kunci: al-Sirat al-Mustaqim; pendapat muktamad; Mazhab Shafi’i.
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
