1,720,955 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
ANALISIS PERJANJIAN DISTRIBUTOR TUNGGAL BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT YANG TERKAIT DENGAN PEMBAGIAN WILAYAH PEMASARAN
No full textMuhammad Faisal Haris, M. Zairul Alam, S.H., M.H., Ranitya Ganindha, S.H., M.H. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya [email protected]  ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keberadaan perjanjian distributor tunggal yang diatur dalam Pasal 21 Ayat (3) Permendag No 11/M-DAG/PER/3/2006 (Permendag No 11 tahun 2006) terhadap Pasal 9 dan Pasal 15 Ayat (1) UU No 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (UU No 5 Tahun 1999). Pada Pasal 21 Ayat (3) menyatakan bahwa Prinsipal dapat membuat perjanjian hanya dengan satu agen tunggal atau distributor tunggal untuk jenis barang dan/atau jasa yang sama dari suatu merek di wilayah pemasaran tertentu untuk jangka waktu tertentu. Sedangkan pada Pasal 15 Ayat (1) menjelaskan bahwa adanya larangan adanya perjanjian yang dibuat oleh pelaku usaha dengan pelaku usaha lain yang memuat persyaratan bahwa pihak yang menerima barang dan/atau jasa hanya akan memasok barang dan/atau jasa tersebut kepada pihak tertentu dan/atau di tempat tertentu. Dalam kedua norma tersebut mengatur mengenai hal yang sama, yakni mengenai distribusi barang yang terkait dengan pembagian wilayah pemasaran, tetapi dengan dua ketentuan yang berbeda. Adapun jenis penelitian yang digunakan penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif, sebаb penelitiаn ini mengkаji perаturаn perundаng-undаngаn terhаdаp perаturаn perundаng-undаngаn yаng lаin dengаn berbаgаi pendekаtаn yаng khаs digunаkаn pаdа penelitiаn hukum jenis ini. Penulis juga menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan teknis analisis melalui interpretasi gramatikal serta interpretasi sistematis. Berasarkan hasil penelitian ini maka dapat diketahui bahwa perjanjian distributor tunggal yang diatur dalam Pasal 21 Ayat (3) Permendag 2006 berpotensi untuk melаnggаr hukum persаingаn usаhа yаng аdа dаlаm UU No. 5 Tаhun 1999. Ketentuаn yаng berpotensi untuk dilаnggаr dаlаm perjаnjiаn distributor tunggаl аntаrа lаin аdаlаh ketentuаn Pаsаl 9 dаn Pаsаl 15 Ðyаt (1). Ðpаbilа hаnyа didаsаrkаn pаdа Permendаg 2006, mаkа dаpаt membukа penаfsirаn bаhwа diperbolehkаnnyа pembаgiаn wilаyаh pemаsаrаn, yаng mаnа ketentuаn tersebut dilаrаng menurut UU No 5 Tаhun 1999. Kata Kunci : Perjanjian distributor tunggal, hukum persaingan usaha, potensi bertentangan  ABSTRACT This research is aimed to analyse the existing sole distributor’s agreement as regulated in Article 21 Paragraph (3) of Trade Minister’s Regulation Number 11/M-DAG/PER/3/2006 (Permendag No 11 Tahun 2006) in comparison to Article 9 and Article 15 Paragraph (1) of Act Number 5 of 1999 concerning Ban on Monopoly Practices and Unhealthy Business Competition (UU No 5 Tahun 1999). Article 21 Paragraph (3) states that a principal is allowed to make an agreement only with one sole agent or sole distributor for consistent type of goods and/or services for a brad in particular marketing regions within a certain time period. Article 15 Paragraph (1), however, bans any agreement made by a businessman with another, implying that goods and/or services receiving parties will only supply the goods and/or services only to certain parties and/or in certain areas. It can be learned that both norms similarly regulate goods distribution according to division of marketing regions, but under two different provisions. This research employed normative juridical method where a legislation is compared to another supported by relevant approaches. Statute approach and interpretation, grammatical, and systematic analyses were also used. The research results find out that sole distributor’s agreement regulated in Article 21 Paragraph (3) of Trade Minister’s Regulation of 2006 is likely to violate the law concerning business competition as in Act Number 5 of 1999. Specifically, the provisions prone to violation involve Article 9 and Article 15 Paragraph (1). Trade Minister’s Regulation 2006 allows division of marketing regions while Act Number 5 of 1999 bans the division. Keywords: sole distributor’s agreement, law concerning business competition, prone to conflic
Analisis Perjanjian Distributor Tunggal Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Yang Terkait Dengan Pembagian Wilayah Pemasaran
Full text linkSuatu perusahaan perlu melaksanakan fungsi distribusi dan bertugas
menyampaikan barang dan jasa yang diperlukan oleh konsumen bagi
pembangunan perekonomian masyarakat.Suatu barang dapat berpindah melalui
beberapa tangan sejak dari produsen ke konsumen atau disebut saluran
distribusi.Saluran distribusi ini dapat langsung dari produsen ke konsumen, juga
dapat melalui perantara. Dalam tulisan ini, akan banyak menganalisis tentang
distributror, khususnya distributor tunggal.
Pengaturan mengenai perjanjian distributor tunggal, dapat ditemui dalam
Permendag No 11/M-DAG/PER/3/2006 (Permendag No 11 Tahun
2006).Keberadaan Permendag 2006 yang terkait pemberian izin pemasaran di
wilayah tertentu oleh distributor tunggal, tidak linier dengan UU No 5 Tahun
1999. Dalam UU No 5 Tahun 1999, jelas melarang adanya pembagian wilayah
pemasaran yang dibentuk melalui perjanjian tertutup. Akan tetapi dalam
konstruksi Permendag No 11 Tahun 2006, pembagian wilayah diperbolehkan,
sepanjang termasuk dalam distributor tunggal.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikаsi, mendeskripsikаn, dаn
mengаnаlisis bаgаimаnа perjаnjiаn distributor tunggаl yаng terkаit dengаn
pembаgiаn wilаyаh pemаsаrаn berdаsаrkаn Undаng-Undаng No 5 Tаhun 1999
tentаng Lаrаngаn Prаktek Monopoli dаn Persаingаn Usаhа Tidаk Sehаt.Dengan
mengangkat permasalahan yang telah dijabarkan diatas, maka penelitian ini
termasuk kedalam penelitian yuridis normatif, sebаb penelitiаn ini mengkаji
perаturаn perundаng-undаngаn terhаdаp perаturаn perundаng-undаngаn yаng lаin
dengаn berbаgаi pendekаtаn yаng khаs digunаkаn pаdа penelitiаn hukum jenis
ini.Penulis juga menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan teknis
analisis melalui interpretasi gramatikal serta interpretasi sistematis.
Dari hasil penelitian, diidentifikasi bahwa perjanjian distributor tunggal berpotensi
untuk melаnggаr hukum persаingаn usаhа yаng аdа dаlаm UU No. 5 Tаhun
1999.Ketentuаn yаng berpotensi untuk dilаnggаr dаlаm perjаnjiаn distributor
tunggаl аntаrа lаin аdаlаh ketentuаn Pаsаl 9 dаn Pаsаl 15 Аyаt (1).Аpаbilа hаnyа
didаsаrkаn pаdа Permendаg 2006, mаkа dаpаt membukа penаfsirаn bаhwа
diperbolehkаnnyа pembаgiаn wilаyаh pemаsаrаn, yаng mаnа ketentuаn tersebut
dilаrаng menurut UU No 5 Tаhun 1999
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
