106,111 research outputs found
Hardwick Grange, Shropshire
No full text'HARDWICK GRANGE. SHROPSHIRE. Drawn by J. P. Neale. Engraved by H. Wallis. London. Pub. Feb. 1. 1826, by J. P. Neale, 16, Bennett St. Blackfriars Road & Sherwood, Jones & Co. Paternoster Row. Printed by J. & G. Bishop.' Accompanied by notes
Heliolonche joaquinensis Hardwick
No full textHeliolonche joaquinensis Hardwick (Figs. 4–5, 12–13, 18–19) Heliolonche joaquinensis Hardwick 1996: 203. Diagnosis. Heliolonche joaquinensis resembles H. pictipennis (Grote) with the black hindwing and white angular band. The forewing is longer in H. joaquinensis than in H. pictipennis and the white angular band in the forewing in H. joaquinensis becomes more of an enlarged angular patch than a band in H. pictipennis. Description. Male: Head: Vertex cream mixed with black hairlike scales; frons bulging, ventral lip not produced, concolorous with vertex. Labial palp with basal and middle segment cream, apical segment black, long black hairlike scales ventrally. Antenna filiform, scape and a few scales at base white, front black, back white. Eye ellipsoid. Thorax: Patagium, tegula, and mesothorax with hairlike scales cream mixed with black; metathorax cream. Venter cream. Foreleg femur cream with long cream ventral fringe; tibia shorter than basitarsus, cream mixed with black, inner side with 1 large spine, outer side with 1 short spine; tarsi black, mixed with white, white apical rings. Middle and hind legs white mixed with black; tarsi black with white apical rings. Forewing: Male length 8.5–9.0 mm (n = 3). Ground color cream with a faint orange tinge overlaying black; orbicular spot small, round, white overlain with ground color; reniform spot and trapezoidal patch below Cu vein coalesced into an angular band, white overlain with ground color; fringe mixed black and white. Underside ground color white with dark gray horizontal band below Cu vein at base, reniform spot round, dark gray. Hindwing: Ground color black; angular band white; fringe white. Abdomen: Black mixed with cream hairlike scales, lateral fringe cream mixed with black, genital tuft cream; hair pencils and scent pockets present. Genitalia (Figs. 12–13): Uncus elongate (0.41 X valve length), gradually narrowing from base to pointed apex. Valve moderately elongate (length 6.7 X width), costal margin straight; posterior margin straight, then slightly curved at 4/5 length; ampulla absent; corona present; sacculus well developed and slightly produced. Juxta rectangular with ventral margin indented medially, with lateral projections, dorsal margin gently curved. Aedoeagus curved at middle, dorsal patch of dense minute spicules; vesica swollen basally, curved dorsad, with minute spicules. Female. As in male except forewing length 8.0–9.5 mm (n = 10). Genitalia (Figs. 18–19): Papillae anales semicircular, apex round. Ovipositor telescopic. Anterior and posterior apophyses wide and robust. Ninth and distal 1/5 to 1/4 of eighth segment finely rugose; a band of short, stout setae below rugose area of eighth segment. Ostium bursae membranous, minute spicules absent. Ductus bursae wide, approximately 0.32 X length. Appendix bursae a small projection, not coiled. Corpus bursae ovate; signa composed of 2 scobinate bars. Holotype ♀, in CNC, with the following labels: 1) Edison, 8 mi ESE, Kern Co., California, 4 IV 1978, V. J. Hardwick; 2) FIG L17 [hand written in black ink]; 3) Holotype Heliolonche joaquinensis Hardwick, 1995, CNC Type 22048. Paratypes. 5♂, 19♀. Same data as holotype (2♂, 11♂ ♀), D. F. Hardwick (CNC), 2 ♂ genitalia slides MGP 1199,1202, ♀ genitalia slide MGP 1201. CALIFORNIA: Kern Co., Taft, 31 Mar. 1943 (3♂, 5♀) (CNC); Maricopa, Monolopia, 10 Apr. 1943 (1♀), W. C. Cook (CNC). San Benito Co., nr. Pinnacles National Monument, 1 May 1991 (2♀), D. & V. Hardwick (CNC). Flight period. Middle of March to early May. Distribution. Found in the San Joaquin Valley from San Benito and Fresno counties in the north and Kern and Santa Barbara counties in the south (Hardwick 1996). Discussion. Although Hardwick (1996) did not describe the adult moth, he did describe the larva, thus validating the name according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The species has become extinct at the type locality from a flood that occurred in the spring of 1983 (Hardwick 1996).Published as part of Pogue, Michael G., 2006, Nomenclatural validation of three North American species of Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and the adult description of Heliolonche joaquinensis Hardwick, pp. 25-36 in Zootaxa 1283 (1283) on pages 32-3
Mrs. Walbert And Mrs. Hardwick Head Committee
No full textPhotograph used for a story in the Oklahoma Times newspaper. Caption: "Heading the printing committee for the ninth annual Beaux Arts ball are Mrs. Charles H. Walbert, 308 NW 18 (left), chairman, and Mrs. Kermit J. Hardwick, 4331 N Georgia, vice-chairman.
Raman spectroscopic and structural studies of heat-treated graphites for lithium-ion batteries
No full textStandard graphite TIMREX(R) SLX 50 was oxidised at 500-800 °C under air atmosphere in a muffle and a rotary furnace. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, and X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) were used to study the changes in surface morphology and crystallinity. The results show a slight increase of the La value and a decrease of the rhombohedral fraction with increased heat-treatment temperature (HTT). XRD measurements show no significant change in La values within the bulk of graphite samples. Above 700 °C SEM images of graphite reveals holes and cavities, whereas heat-treatment temperatures below 700 °C do not significantly affect graphite materials parameters
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Helicoverpa Hardwick 1965
No full textGenus <i>Helicoverpa</i> Hardwick, 1965 <p> <b>Type species:</b> <i>Noctua armigera</i> Hübner by original designation.</p> <p> <b>PLATE 1.</b> Figures 1–8. 1, <i>Heliothis viriplaca</i>, Tehran; 2, <i>H. maritima</i>, Lorestan; 3, <i>H. nubigera</i>, Kerman; 4, <i>H. peltigera</i>, Esfahan; 5, <i>H. incarnata</i>, Baluchestan; 6, <i>Helicoverpa armigera,</i> Guilan; 7, <i>Schinia scutosa</i>, Golestan; 8, <i>Periphanes delphinii</i>, Fars.</p> <p> <b>PLATE 2.</b> Figures 9–16. 9, <i>Periphanes treitschkei,</i> Azarbayjan; 10, <i>P. victorina</i>, Tehran (Damavand); 11, <i>Pyrrhia umbra</i>, Guilan; 12, <i>Aedophron phlebophora</i>, Kordestan; 13, <i>A. venosa</i>, Khorasan; 14, <i>A. rhodites</i>, Kordestan; 15, <i>A. sumorita</i>, Zandjan; 16, <i>Heliocheilus confertissima</i>, Hormozgan.</p> <p> <b>PLATE 3.</b> Figures 17–21. 17, <i>Masalia albida</i>, Kerman; 18, <i>M. philbyi</i>, Hormozgan; 19, <i>M. perstriata fuscostriata</i>, Hormozgan; 20, <i>Heliothis viriplaca</i>, slide 440, Kermanshah; 21, <i>H. maritima</i>, slide 441, Lorestan.</p>Published as part of <i>Matov, Alexej, Zahiri, Reza & Holloway, Jeremy D., 2008, The Heliothinae of Iran (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), pp. 1-37 in Zootaxa 1763</i> on pages 8-11, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/181966">10.5281/zenodo.181966</a>
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function
No full textThis thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author
EFFECTIVNESS OF SYNTHETIC INSECTICIDES AGAINST HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER) HARDWICK AND SPODOPTERA LITURA (FABRICIUS) INFESTING GROUNDNUT
No full textAn experiment was conducted at Anand Agricultural University, Anand during summer, 2011 to study on the evaluation of insecticides for the management of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Hardwick and Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) infesting groundnut. Insecticides used in experiment were Emamectin benzoate 5 WG @ 0.002%, Thiodicarb 75 WP @ 0.075%, Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.007%, Spinosad 45 SC @ 0.018%, Novaluron 10 EC @ 0.01%, Lufeneuron 5 EC @ 0.005%, Flubendiamide 480 SC @ 0.014%, Chlorantraniliprole 20 SC @ 0.006% and Metaflumizone 22 SC @ 0.044%. Two sprays of respective insecticides were applied at 15 days interval. Among nine insecticides, chlorantraniliprole (0.006%), spinosad (0.018%) and emamectin benzoate (0.002%) were noticed higher effective and statistically at par with each other in protecting the groundnut crop from the infestation of both pests. Metaflumizone (0.044%) and lufeneuron (0.005%) were noticed poor in checking the incidence of H. armigera and S. litura. Highest cost benefit ratio 1: 3.3 was observed in chlorantraniliprole (0.006%) followed by indoxacarb treatment
- …
