1,720,964 research outputs found

    Periodicity pitch perception part III: sensibility and Pachinko volatility

    Full text link
    Neuromorphic computer models are used to explain sensory perceptions. Auditory models generate cochleagrams, which resemble the spike distributions in the auditory nerve. Neuron ensembles along the auditory pathway transform sensory inputs step by step and at the end pitch is represented in auditory categorical spaces. In two previous articles in the series on periodicity pitch perception an extended auditory model had been successfully used for explaining periodicity pitch proved for various musical instrument generated tones and sung vowels. In this third part in the series the focus is on octopus cells as they are central sensitivity elements in auditory cognition processes. A powerful numerical model had been devised, in which auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) spike events are the inputs, triggering the impulse responses of the octopus cells. Efficient algorithms are developed and demonstrated to explain the behavior of octopus cells with a focus on a simple event-based hardware implementation of a layer of octopus neurons. The main finding is, that an octopus' cell model in a local receptive field fine-tunes to a specific trajectory by a spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) learning rule with synaptic pre-activation and the dendritic back-propagating signal as post condition. Successful learning explains away the teacher and there is thus no need for a temporally precise control of plasticity that distinguishes between learning and retrieval phases. Pitch learning is cascaded: At first octopus cells respond individually by self-adjustment to specific trajectories in their local receptive fields, then unions of octopus cells are collectively learned for pitch discrimination. Pitch estimation by inter-spike intervals is shown exemplary using two input scenarios: a simple sinus tone and a sung vowel. The model evaluation indicates an improvement in pitch estimation on a fixed time-scale

    En route to sound coding strategies for optical cochlear implants

    Full text link
    Hearing loss is the most common human sensory deficit. Severe-to-complete sensorineural hearing loss is often treated by electrical cochlear implants (eCIs) bypassing dysfunctional or lost hair cells by direct stimulation of the auditory nerve. The wide current spread from each intracochlear electrode array contact activates large sets of tonotopically organized neurons limiting spectral selectivity of sound coding. Despite many efforts, an increase in the number of independent eCI stimulation channels seems impossible to achieve. Light, which can be better confined in space than electric current may help optical cochlear implants (oCIs) to overcome eCI shortcomings. In this review, we present the current state of the optogenetic sound encoding. We highlight optical sound coding strategy development capitalizing on the optical stimulation that requires fine-grained, fast, and power-efficient real-time sound processing controlling dozens of microscale optical emitters as an emerging research area

    Auf einem menschlichen Gehörmodell basierende Elektrodenstimulationsstrategie für Cochleaimplantate

    Full text link
    Cochleaimplantate (CI), verbunden mit einer professionellen Rehabilitation, haben mehreren hunderttausenden Hörgeschädigten die verbale Kommunikation wieder ermöglicht. Betrachtet man jedoch die Rehabilitationserfolge, so haben CI-Systeme inzwischen ihre Grenzen erreicht. Die Tatsache, dass die meisten CI-Träger nicht in der Lage sind, Musik zu genießen oder einer Konversation in geräuschvoller Umgebung zu folgen, zeigt, dass es noch Raum für Verbesserungen gibt.Diese Dissertation stellt die neue CI-Signalverarbeitungsstrategie Stimulation based on Auditory Modeling (SAM) vor, die vollständig auf einem Computermodell des menschlichen peripheren Hörsystems beruht.Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde die SAM Strategie dreifach evaluiert: mit vereinfachten Wahrnehmungsmodellen von CI-Nutzern, mit fünf CI-Nutzern, und mit 27 Normalhörenden mittels eines akustischen Modells der CI-Wahrnehmung. Die Evaluationsergebnisse wurden stets mit Ergebnissen, die durch die Verwendung der Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE) Strategie ermittelt wurden, verglichen. ACE stellt die zurzeit verbreitetste Strategie dar. Erste Simulationen zeigten, dass die Sprachverständlichkeit mit SAM genauso gut wie mit ACE ist. Weiterhin lieferte SAM genauere binaurale Merkmale, was potentiell zu einer Verbesserung der Schallquellenlokalisierungfähigkeit führen kann. Die Simulationen zeigten ebenfalls einen erhöhten Anteil an zeitlichen Pitchinformationen, welche von SAM bereitgestellt wurden. Die Ergebnisse der nachfolgenden Pilotstudie mit fünf CI-Nutzern zeigten mehrere Vorteile von SAM auf. Erstens war eine signifikante Verbesserung der Tonhöhenunterscheidung bei Sinustönen und gesungenen Vokalen zu erkennen. Zweitens bestätigten CI-Nutzer, die kontralateral mit einem Hörgerät versorgt waren, eine natürlicheren Klangeindruck. Als ein sehr bedeutender Vorteil stellte sich drittens heraus, dass sich alle Testpersonen in sehr kurzer Zeit (ca. 10 bis 30 Minuten) an SAM gewöhnen konnten. Dies ist besonders wichtig, da typischerweise Wochen oder Monate nötig sind. Tests mit Normalhörenden lieferten weitere Nachweise für die verbesserte Tonhöhenunterscheidung mit SAM.Obwohl SAM noch keine marktreife Alternative ist, versucht sie den Weg für zukünftige Strategien, die auf Gehörmodellen beruhen, zu ebnen und ist somit ein erfolgversprechender Kandidat für weitere Forschungsarbeiten.Cochlear implants (CIs) combined with professional rehabilitation have enabled several hundreds of thousands of hearing-impaired individuals to re-enter the world of verbal communication. Though very successful, current CI systems seem to have reached their peak potential. The fact that most recipients claim not to enjoy listening to music and are not capable of carrying on a conversation in noisy or reverberative environments shows that there is still room for improvement.This dissertation presents a new cochlear implant signal processing strategy called Stimulation based on Auditory Modeling (SAM), which is completely based on a computational model of the human peripheral auditory system.SAM has been evaluated through simplified models of CI listeners, with five cochlear implant users, and with 27 normal-hearing subjects using an acoustic model of CI perception. Results have always been compared to those acquired using Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE), which is today’s most prevalent CI strategy. First simulations showed that speech intelligibility of CI users fitted with SAM should be just as good as that of CI listeners fitted with ACE. Furthermore, it has been shown that SAM provides more accurate binaural cues, which can potentially enhance the sound source localization ability of bilaterally fitted implantees. Simulations have also revealed an increased amount of temporal pitch information provided by SAM. The subsequent pilot study, which ran smoothly, revealed several benefits of using SAM. First, there was a significant improvement in pitch discrimination of pure tones and sung vowels. Second, CI users fitted with a contralateral hearing aid reported a more natural sound of both speech and music. Third, all subjects were accustomed to SAM in a very short period of time (in the order of 10 to 30 minutes), which is particularly important given that a successful CI strategy change typically takes weeks to months. An additional test with 27 normal-hearing listeners using an acoustic model of CI perception delivered further evidence for improved pitch discrimination ability with SAM as compared to ACE.Although SAM is not yet a market-ready alternative, it strives to pave the way for future strategies based on auditory models and it is a promising candidate for further research and investigation

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore