28,364 research outputs found
« The author writes like a Briton ». La réception de Balzac en Angleterre
Salazar Philippe-Joseph. « The author writes like a Briton ». La réception de Balzac en Angleterre. In: Littératures classiques, n°33, printemps 1998. Fortunes de Guez de Balzac. pp. 247-262
The Enigma of H. Costenoble – The Long Search for the Author of Die Chamoro Sprache
Cette note retrace l’histoire des recherches visant à trouver la vraie identité de l’auteur d’une étude sur la langue Chamorro parue, en 1940, à la Haye et évoque les fausses pistes suivies par certains chercheurs. Il s’agit en fait de Hermann Costenoble, un linguiste amateur d’origine allemande qui vécut aux Carolines, au Guam et aux Philippines et qui mourut en 1942 à la suite de l’invasion des Philippines par les Japonais.Salazar Marlies. The Enigma of H. Costenoble – The Long Search for the Author of Die Chamoro Sprache. In: Archipel, volume 77, 2009. pp. 21-25
El texto vasco de Lope García Salazar
Comentarios y posibles traducciones al texto en euskera de García de Salazar sobre la muerte de el señor de Valmaseda. Lo compara con dichos y refranes actualesCommentaries and possible translations to the text in Basque by García de Salazar on the death of the Lord of Valmaseda. The author compares it with current saying
Chaetacanthus pilosus Salazar-Silva & López-Sánchez & Salazar-Vallejo 2020
Chaetacanthus pilosus (Treadwell, 1937) Figures 14–16 Lepidonotus pilosus Treadwell, 1937: 141–143, Pl. 1, Figs. 1–7. Lepidonotus pomareae panamensis Hartman, 1939a: 44–46, Pl. 6, Figs. 70–77 (partim). Lepidonotus panamensis: Hartman 1948: 28 (n. status, partim). Chaetacanthus magnificus: Salazar-Vallejo et al. 1990: 215, Fig. 37 (non Grube, 1876). Chaetacanthus pilosus: Salazar-Silva 2006: 146 (reinst.). Type material. Eastern Pacific. Holotype of Lepidonotus pilosus Treadwell, 1937, AMNH 3531, Arena Bank, Gulf of California, Sta. 136, D-13 (23°29’ N 109° 24’ W), 20 Apr. 1936. Holotype of Lepidonotus pomareae panamensis Hartman, 1939a, LACM 3, AHF-5, Poly 0039, Bahía Honda, Panama, off North Island, R / V Velero III, Sta. 863- 38, 54–90 m, 1 Mar.1938. Additional material. Eastern Pacific, Panama. One specimen, LACM 863-38, off Bahía Honda, 54–90 m, rock sand mud, R/ V Velero, Sta. 863-38, 07°45’35” N, 81°35’35” W, 26 Jan. 1939, identified as Lepidonotus pomareae panamensis but separated from holotype. Diagnosis. Chaetacanthus with branchial filaments digitiform, bifurcated; elytra with abundant pedunculated macrotubercles and microtubercles, spinous, hemispherical, amber in colour, larger over the elytrophore and on first pair of elytra. Description. Holotype of Lepidonotus pilosus (AMNH 3531) robust, 2.5 cm long, 1.3 cm wide, 26 segments; body homogeneously yellowish without spots, integument wrinkled. Prostomium longer than wide, slightly retracted into segment two; prostomial lobes laterally expanded. Two pairs of eyes, circular, dark, anterior pair on widest prostomial area, posterior pair hidden under anterior projection of segment two (Fig. 14A). Facial tubercle long, slender. Median antenna with ceratophore thick, long, inserted frontally, at same level of lateral antennae, style missing. Lateral antennae with ceratophores thick, long, inserted frontally on prostomial lobes, styles missing. Palps robust, long, two times longer than prostomial length, tapered into filiform tips, surface with rows of papillae. Pharynx not everted. Tentacular segment not visible dorsally. Tentaculophores thick, long, inserted laterally to prostomium, with several chaetae; tentacular cirri missing. Second segment projected anteriorly over prostomium as a wide round lobe. First pair of elytrophores expanded laterally over tentaculophores, with large elytral scar. Segment three narrower than following ones. Elytral margin with fringe of abundant long papillae (Fig. 14B), all with a distinctive bundle of papillae on posterior margin. Elytral surface with abundant spinous macrotubercles, and microtubercles. Macrotubercles pedunculate, distally hemispherical with abundant small spines, mostly scattered along elytral surface, but in first pair of elytra macrotubercles prominent, concentrated in elytral plug area (Fig. 14C, D). Microtubercles hemispherical or tapered, tips subconical. Parapodia biramous, robust. Notopodia short. Neuropodia short, truncated, with acicular tips emergent (Fig. 14E, F). Notopodia with abundant brachial filaments (Fig. 14F), dorsally and laterally, each filament swollen, appearing septate, tips bifurcate. Dorsal cirri thin, long, slightly clavate, tips filiform. Cirrophores bulbous basally, elongate; elytrophores wide with large elytral scars. Ventral cirri short, not reaching neuropodial tips. Nephridial papillae thick, long. Notochaetae abundant, thin, spinous capillaries, thinner and shorter than neurochaetae (Fig. 14E, F). Neurochaetae thick, dark amber (Fig. 14F), upper fascicle with shorter chaetae with long entire tips, lower ones curved, subdistally with short spines. Remarks. Although Hartman (1939a) did not examine the type material of L. pilosus, she correctly regarded it as belonging to Chaetacantus but as a junior synonym of C. magnificus (Grube, 1876). Type material of both species was examined. Treadwell (1937) described and illustrated the type of L. pilosus indicating it has parapodial branchial filaments, and this confirms its belonging into Chaetacanthus. However, C. pilosus differs from C. magnificus (Grube, 1876), herein synonymized with C. brasiliensis (de Quatrefages, 1866). The main difference is that the elytra of C. pilosus do not have the prominent patch of sclerotized, amber macrotubercles arranged in honeycomb like patches, because of this difference C. pilosus is redescribed. The nominal species, Lepidonotus pomareae, and the subspecies, L. p. panamensis, both have branchial filaments between successive parapodia (Fig. 16F). However, because the features of L. pomarae panamensis are the same as those shown by C. pilosus in prostomium (Fig. 16A), elytral ornamentation (Figs 15 A–D; 16B–E), notochaetae and neurochaetae (Fig. 16G, H), the subspecies deserved to be raised in status as a full species, as correctly indicated by Hartman (1948) as C. panamensis (Hartman, 1939). Nevertheless, this species shares the same morphological pattern with C. pilosus (Treadwell, 1937) and it is herein regarded as a junior synonym of the latter. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that in the USNM in Washington (USNM 47981), there is another specimen incorrectly labeled as the holotype of Lepidonotus panamensis Hartman, 1939, collected in Honda Bay, near Coiba Island (R/V Velero III, Sta. 861-38). Hartman (1939: 44) included three specimens for her Lepidonotus pomareae panamensis, two from Station 863-38, and one from station 254-34, with no specimen from any other locality (station 861-38). Consequently, that additional USNM specimen cannot be the holotype (ICZN 1999, Art. 73.1). It must be indicated that in C. pomareae (Kinberg, 1856), elytra of median segments only have bulbous microtubercles with thick tips, whereas in posterior elytra the prominent conical macrotubercles are basally spinous with long, smooth tips (see below), and these macrotubercles are not present in C. pilosus. Type locality. Arena Bank (23°29’ N, 109°24’ W), Gulf of California. Distribution. Gulf of California and Bahía Honda, Panama.Published as part of Salazar-Silva, Patricia, López-Sánchez, Daniel A. & Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2020, Revision of Chaetacanthus Seidler, 1922 (Annelida, Phyllodocida, Polynoidae), pp. 395-422 in Zootaxa 4885 (3) on pages 411-414, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/429677
Obras q[ue] Francisco Ceruantes de Salazar ha hecho, glosado y traduzido ...
Pie de imp. tomado del colofón, al final de la primera obra (h. LXXX)Marca tipográfica al final de cada parteSign.: a4, b10, a-k8, a12, A-H8, I6, A4, B-F8, G10Errores de foliaciónCada parte con port. y pag. propia. El orden de las obras contenidas varía en cada port.Portadas a dos tintas con orla xilográficaEx-libris ms. en port.: "es de la libreria de S[an] B[enit]o El R[ea]l"Enc. en perg. con abrazaderasEn la contraport. nota ms. de pertenenciaAnt. sign.: 01442 en etiqueta impresa de la Biblioteca universitaria en contraguarda anteriorContiene: Dialogo de la dignidad del hombre ... / come[n]çado por el maestro Oliua y acabado por Fra[n]cisco Cerua[n]tes de Salazar. Appologo de la ociosidad y el trabajo intitulado Labricio Portundo ... / compuesto por ... Luys Mexia ; glosado y moralizado por Fra[n]cisco Ceruantes de Salazar. Introduccion y camino para la sabiduria ... / compuesta en latin por ... Luys Viues ; buelta en castellano con muchas adiciones ... por Francisco Ceruantes de Salazar
Document about Juan de Oñate, Luis Chirino de Salazar, and Vicente Saldivar from Madrid.
Document about Juan de Oñate, Luis Chirino de Salazar, and Vicente Saldivar from Madrid. Unedited transcription available
Mormodes sotoana Salazar, Orquidea
Mormodes sotoana Salazar, Orquídea (Mexico City), n.s. 12(2): 261. 1992. Voucher: H. Vega 1866 (TEFH).Published as part of Vega, Hermes, Cetzal-Ix, William, Mó, Edgar, Romero-Soler, Katya J. & Basu, Saikat K., 2022, An Updated Checklist of the Orchidaceae of Honduras, pp. 1-80 in Phytotaxa 562 (1) on page 62, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.562.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/707369
Territorial behavior of Laothus gibberosa Hewitson, Adelotypa densemaculata Hewitson and Pseudotinea volcanicus Callaghan & Salazar in fragmented lands capes (lepidoptera: lycaenidae, riodinidae)
En este artículo se analiza brevemente el comportamiento territorial de 3 especies de mariposas colombianas: Laothus gibberosa (Hewitson), Adelotypa densemaculata (Hewitson) y Pseudotinea volcanicus Callaghan & Salazar por poblaciones observadas en el occidente de Caldas, Colombia.In this paper the territorial behavior of three species of Colombian butterflies Laothus gibberosa (Hewitson), Adelotypa densemaculata (Hewitson) and Pseudotinea volcanicus Callaghan & Salazar is briefly analyzed using populations observed in Western Caldas district, Colombia
- …
