1,720,982 research outputs found
Comparison of Pain Levels of Traditional Radial, Distal Radial, and Transfemoral Coronary Catheterization
No full textKilic, Raif/0000-0002-8338-4948; Guzel, Tuncay/0000-0001-8470-1928; Karahan, Mehmet Zulkif/0000-0001-8145-9574; Gunlu, Serhat/0000-0001-6985-6112; Arslan, Bayram/0000-0003-2984-9094OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the traditional radial artery, distal radial artery, and transfemoral artery, which are vascular access sites for coronary angiography, in terms of pain level using the visual analog scale.METHODS: Between April 2021 and May 2022, consecutive patients from three centers were included in our study. A total of 540 patients, 180 from each of the traditional radial artery, distal radial artery , and transfemoral artery groups, were included. The visual analog scale was applied to the patients as soon as they were taken to bed. RESULTS: When the visual analog scale was compared between the groups, it was found to be significantly different (transfemoral artery: 2.7 & PLUSMN;1.6, traditional radial artery: 3.9 & PLUSMN;1.9, and distal radial artery: 4.9 & PLUSMN;2.1, respectively, p29.8 kg/m2 predicted severe pain with 72.5% sensitivity and 73.2% specificity [(area under the curve: 0.770, 95%CI: 0.724-0.815, p<0.0001)].CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that the femoral approach caused less access site pain and a high body mass index predicts severe pain
Comparison of Pain Levels of Traditional Radial, Distal Radial, and Transfemoral Coronary Catheterization
No full textKilic, Raif/0000-0002-8338-4948; Arslan, Bayram/0000-0003-2984-9094; Karahan, Mehmet Zulkif/0000-0001-8145-9574; Gunlu, Serhat/0000-0001-6985-6112; Guzel, Tuncay/0000-0001-8470-1928OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the traditional radial artery, distal radial artery, and transfemoral artery, which are vascular access sites for coronary angiography, in terms of pain level using the visual analog scale.METHODS: Between April 2021 and May 2022, consecutive patients from three centers were included in our study. A total of 540 patients, 180 from each of the traditional radial artery, distal radial artery , and transfemoral artery groups, were included. The visual analog scale was applied to the patients as soon as they were taken to bed. RESULTS: When the visual analog scale was compared between the groups, it was found to be significantly different (transfemoral artery: 2.7 & PLUSMN;1.6, traditional radial artery: 3.9 & PLUSMN;1.9, and distal radial artery: 4.9 & PLUSMN;2.1, respectively, p29.8 kg/m2 predicted severe pain with 72.5% sensitivity and 73.2% specificity [(area under the curve: 0.770, 95%CI: 0.724-0.815, p<0.0001)].CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that the femoral approach caused less access site pain and a high body mass index predicts severe pain
Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes
Full text linkKaya, Ahmet Ferhat/0000-0003-0544-0657; Arslan, Bayram/0000-0003-2984-9094; KILIC, RAIF/0000-0002-8338-4948; KARAHAN, Mehmet Zulkif/0000-0001-8145-9574; GUZEL, TUNCAY/0000-0001-8470-1928; Demirci, Murat/0000-0002-8835-9557Background: Sarcopenia is a progressive age-related skeletal muscle disease associated with adverse outcomes in those with cardiovascular disease. In this study, the prevalence of sarcopenia and its effect on clinical outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients were examined. Methods: A total of 722 patients from three centres who applied to the outpatient clinic with the diagnosis of HFmrEF between 01 January 2020 and 01 June 2021 were included in the study retrospectively. Sarcopenia was diagnosed with a screening test using age, grip srength and calf circumference. At least two-year follow-up results were reviewed from the date the patients were included in the study. Results: Of the 722 HFmrEF patients, 169 (23.4%) were sarcopenic. During the follow-up of sarcopenic patients, a higher rate of hospitalisation and two-year mortality was detected compared to the non-sarcopenic group (49.7% vs 33.3%, p < .001 and 23.7% vs 13.2%, p = .001, respectively). Additionally, atrial fibrillation (AF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic renal failure (CRF) and smoking were detected at higher rates in sarcopenic patients. In subgroup analysis, AF was found to be significantly higher in overweight/obese sarcopenia patients compared to other groups. According to Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the sarcopenia score cut-off of 73.61 predicted mortality with 65% sensitivity and 63% specificity, and the cut-off level of 71.10 predicted hospitalisation with 68% sensitivity and 69% specificity. Conclusion: In HFmrEF patients, sarcopenia is associated with adverse events and is an important prognostic marker
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
