1,721,052 research outputs found
Cyana guttifera
No full text311. Cyana guttifera (Walker, 1856):1779 Type locality: Landoor, N. W. Himalaya Distribution: South, North and North East India (Hampson 1900, Singh et al. 2014).Published as part of Singh, Navneet, Joshi, Rahul, Kirti, Jagbir Singh, Bisht, Santosh Singh & Param, Harsimranjeet Singh, 2021, A catalogue of Indian Arctiinae (Erebidae, Lepidoptera), pp. 1-118 in Zootaxa 5058 (1) on page 54, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5058.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/560257
Oxythyrea (Stichothyrea) guttifera
No full textOxythyrea (Stichothyrea) guttifera (Afzelius, 1817) (Figs. 4b, c) Distribution: GAM, GBI, GHA, RCI, SEN. Distribution in Guinea-Bissau (Administrative Regions): 1) BAF; 2) GAB. Historic records: — Bafatá (BAF) (Brivio 1958 sub Sticothyrea guttifera Afz.). Material examined: Béli (11º 49´38.60´´ N, 13º 55´34.36´´ W, 76m alt.) (GAB), 4-5.VII.2009, 3♂, 1♀, DO, A. Serrano leg., ASC. Remarks. A typical West African species. Mudge et al. (2012) provided biodiversity information (abundance, habitat preference) of this species for GHA. See also the remarks under P. cordata. Biological data are not available for this species. It is a new species record for GAB Administrative Region of Guinea-Bissau.Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., 2022, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Guinea-Bissau: an annotated checklist and new records, pp. 151-195 in Zootaxa 5104 (2) on page 166, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/628069
No evidence for contribution of sexually monomorphic wing pigmentation pattern to mate choice in Drosophila guttifera
Get PDFIn many animal groups, sexually dimorphic ornaments are thought to evolve by intraspecific competition or mate choice. Some researchers pointed out that sexually monomorphic ornaments could also evolve by mate choice by both sexes or either sex. Many species of fruit fly have sexually monomorphic wing pigmentation. However, involvement of their sexually monomorphic ornaments in mate choice has not been tested. We aimed to examine whether the sexually monomorphic polka-dotted pattern on wings of Drosophila guttifera contributes to mate choice. Because D. guttifera does not mate in the dark condition at all and no courtship sound has been observed, some visual information is likely to be used in mating behaviour. We compared the number of matings between individuals with and without wings and found that presence of wings influenced mating behaviour in both sexes. We then compared the number of matings between individuals bearing replaced wings, one group bearing conspecific D. guttifera wings and another group bearing heterospecific D. melanogaster wings with no pigmentation pattern. An effect of conspecific/heterospecific wings was only detected in mate choice by females. Comparison between wild-type and black-painted wings revealed no evidence of a contribution of wing pigmentation pattern to mate choice in either sex
Cyana guttifera
No full textCyana guttifera (Walker, 1856) (Figs 78, 79, 194, 262) Bizone guttifera Walker, 1856, List of the specimens of lepidopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum 7: 1779 (Type locality: “Landoor, N. W. Himalaya”). Type material examined. Holotype (by monotypy): ♀, handwritten label “Himalayas. Landoor (Hearsey.) 54-74.” / printed label “GUTTIFERA” / printed round label with a green circle “Type” / printed label with a unique identifier “NHMUK010402110” (Coll. NHMUK). Other material examined. HIMACHAL PRADESH: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Kangra (Hocking) 86–69 (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♀, Himachal Pradesh, Majathal, 2.VIII.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); UTTARAKHAND: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, In- dia sept., Kumaon-Himalaya, Distr. NainiTal, BhimTal, 1500 m, 2.IV.1979, leg. F. Smetacek (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, India, Kumaon-Himalaya, Bhimtal, 1500 m, 25.III.1976, leg. F. Smetaсek (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, India sept., Himalaya, Bhimtal, 9.IX.1978, slide AV4660 ♂ Volynkin (Coll. CKC); 4 ♀, India, Indian Himalaya, Ut- taranchal, Nainital, Sathkol village, XI.2003, leg. Saluk (Coll. MWM / ZSM); SIKKIM: 1 ♀, Sikkim, O. Möller, 1900–64 (Coll. NHMUK); 12 ♂, 6 ♀, India, Sikkim, Legship, 500 m, 24–28.VII.1990, leg. W. Thomas, slide ZSM Arct. 124/2017 ♂ Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 3 ♂, 2 ♀, India-Sikkim, Pemayangtse Vic., Geysing, 1400 m, Lf., 24.VIII.1988, leg. W. Thomas (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 3 ♂, 4 ♀, India, Sikkim, Namchi, 1000 m, 2.VII.1986, leg. W. Thomas, slide ZSM Arct. 125/2017 ♀ Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, Sikkim, Mt. Kanchenjunga, SE, 2000 m, 22–31.VII.1995, 27’30”N, 88’20”E, leg. E. Afonin & V. Siniaev (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♀, India, Sikkim, 14 km nördl. Gangtok, 1500 m, 2.VIII.1989, leg. W. Thomas (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♀, Sikkim, 8.IV.1888, O. Møller / Col- lectio H. J. Elwes, slide AV2074 ♀ Volynkin (Coll. ZFMK); 1 ♂, India, Sikkim, Golitar, 20.IX.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); WEST BENGAL: 1 ♀, Darjeeling, Dr. Lidderdale, 79–57 (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♂, India, W.B., Dar- jeeling, Himafalls, 2000 m, 4.VIII.1989, leg. W. Thomas (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 13 ♂, 11 ♀, India W.B., Darjeeling, Manjitar, 650 m, 19–21.VII.1989, leg. Dr. W. Thomas (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 3 ♂, 1 ♀, India W.B., Darjeeling, Pashok, 850 m, 4.VII.1986, leg. Dr. W. Thomas (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, 2 ♀, India W.B., Darjeeling, Kalimpong, 1250 m, 5.VII.1986, leg. Dr. W. Thomas (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, India WB, 650 m, Darjeeling, Rambi, 28.III.1986, leg. W. Thomas (Coll. MWM / ZSM); ASSAM: 1 ♂, Assam, 5000 ft., Shillong, X.1921 (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♂, NE India, Assam, Nameri Nat. Park, 40 km N Tezpur, 150 m, 27°20’N, 93°15’E, 24.VII–2.VIII.1997, leg. Sinjaev & Murzin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); MEGHALAYA: 1 ♂, Cherrapunji, X.1893, Assam (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♂, Khasis, IV.1894, Nat. Coll. (Coll. NHMUK); 2 ♂, 3 ♀, NE India, Assam, W Meghalaya, Garo Hills, Nokrek National Park, 25°40’N, 91°04’E, 1150 m, 2–13.VII 1997, leg. Afonin & Sinajev (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 7 ♂, 11 ♀, NE India, W Meghalaya, Umran, 33 km N Shillong, 26°06’N, 92°23’E, 800 m, 14–23.VII.1997, leg. Sinjaev & Afonin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, [Meghalaya] Khasis, Nat. Coll., slide AV2073 ♂ Volynkin (Coll. ZFMK); 3 ♂, Mawsynram, 27.VIII.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Meghalaya, Jowai, 17.IX.2015, leg. Kumar Kaustubh (Coll. NZCZSI); MIZORAM: 1 ♂, Mizoram, Variegate, 19.IX.2016, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); ARUNACHAL PRADESH: 1 ♂, Arunachal Pradesh, Raga, 5.V.2016, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); TAMIL NADU: 1 ♀, India mer., 1000 m, Tamil Nadu, Kalkad, Wildlife Sanctuary, Manjolai, 6–7.IV.1997, 8.15’N, 77.27’E, tea estate / rainforest, Sinjaev & Schintlmeister (Coll. MWM / ZSM); KERALA: 1 ♀, [S India, Kerala] Travancore, 1900–23 (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♂, India mer., Kerala, 6 km N Munnar, 1700 m, Kodalar, Tea Estate, 10.06’N / 77.04’E, 14–15.IV.1997, leg. Schintlmeister & Siniaev, Mountain rainforest, 14 °C (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, Kerala, Thenmala, 08.VIII.2017, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Kerala, Vadaserikara, 11.VIII.2017, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♂, Kerala, Peri- yar, 12.VIII.2017, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); KARNATAKA: 1 ♂, Karnataka, Jog falls, 20.XI.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Karnataka, Yellapur, 23.XI.2014, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI). Diagnosis. Forewing length is 10.5–12 mm in males and 12.5–13 mm in females. Cyana guttifera is similar externally to C. moelleri and its allies, but can be distinguished by the pale ochreous hindwings of both sexes. The male genital capsule of C. guttifera is very different from that of C. moelleri and its allies by its V-shaped vinculum (that is U-shaped in C. moelleri), longer transtilla, and valva being narrowed distally and having narrow and heavily sclerotized ventral medial lobe of costa (whereas in C. moelleri and its allies the valva is strongly broadened distally and the ventral medial lobe of costa is short, broad and more weakly sclerotized). The aedeagus of C. guttifera is shorter and broader than that of C. moelleri and its allies, and bears a V-like cluster of short spinules distally. The vesica of C. guttifera is broad and has two large diverticula, one of which bears a large and strongly dentate cornutus, whereas in C. moelleri and its allies vesica is smaller, has smaller diverticula and bears clusters of spinules. The female genitalia of C. guttifera differ clearly from those of other Indian congeners by the very broad and heavily sclerotized ductus bursae. Distribution. South, North and North East India (Hampson 1900; Smetacek 2008; Singh et al. 2014), Nepal (Kishida 1993; 1994; 1998), Bhutan, China (Xizang, Yunnan, Guangxi, Hainan) (Fang 2000), North and West Thailand (Černý & Pinratana 2009), North Vietnam (de Joannis 1928).Published as part of Singh, Navneet, Volynkin, Anton V., Kirti, Jagbir Singh, Datta, Harvinder Singh & Ivanova, Maria S., 2020, A review of the genus Cyana Walker, 1854 from India, with descriptions of five new species and three new subspecies (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae: Lithosiini), pp. 1-93 in Zootaxa 4738 (1) on pages 28-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4738.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/367243
RNAi knockdown of developmental genes in <i>D</i>. <i>guttifera</i>.
No full texta, b, Knockdown of wg mRNA in D. guttifera at pupal stages P7 and P8. c, d, Knockdown of dpp mRNA in D. guttifera at pupal stage P8. (TIF)</p
Wing size and wing spot size of Drosophila guttifera
No full textThis data set shows wing size and wing spot size of Drosophila guttifera. We reared the flies under different temperature conditions and tested if wing size and spot size exhibit thermal plasticity. Not only we measured the absolute spot size for two spots, but we adjusted spot size with wing size and measured ratio of size between different spots.</p
Genes differentially expressed in the pigmentation areas of Drosophila guttifera.
No full textThis data set is obtained from transcriptome analysis of Drosophila guttifera. This species has plka-dotted pigmentation pattern on its wings. We identified upregulated or downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the pigmentation area around a campaniform sensilla (cs), a tip of a wing vein (vt). We also identified upregulated or downregulated DEGs in the area where wingless gene is overexpressed (wg)
Ogdoecosta guttifera Boheman 1854
No full textOgdoecosta guttifera (Boheman 1854) (Figs 11 A–C) Chelymorpha guttifera Boheman 1854:86 Male. Length 9.4–10.2 mm, width 6–8 mm (n=5). Black, glabrous, shiny. HEAD. Surface black, rugose, punctate; supraorbital area with scattered long setae. Genal surface with large scattered punctures, short setae. Interocular width no more than 2 times diameter of eyes. Antennae reaching pronotal base; Antennomere III longer than IV, antennomere I shorter than XI. Clypeus oval-shaped, 1.5–2 times wider than long, surface with large punctures. Labrum over 3 times wider than long; surface smooth. THORAX. Pronotum expanded, 2–3 times wider than long; surface pubescent, black; anterior margin emarginated, margination U-shaped; base sinuous; hind angles sharp and produced behind, with fine punctures; explanate margin coarsely and closely punctate; pronotal disc with two large orange spots and weak longitudinal groove. Prosternum glabrous. Scutellum triangular, surface smooth, black. Elytral surface glabrous, black, with pattern of five spots on each elytron, one at base, two before middle, one in middle part, and one near apex; punctures moderately coarse and proximate; humeri rounded, impunctate, black. Prosternal process with scattered setae, with distinctive groove, apex rounded. Mesosternal process deeply notched. ABDOMEN. Ventrites surface smooth, pubescent, black. Aedeagus length less than 2 mm, apex acute (Fig. 20 B). Female. Similar to male; oval shaped. Length 11.6–12 mm, width 8–9 mm (n=5). Interocular width no more than 2 times diameter of eyes. Clypeus 1.5–2 times wider than long. Labrum over 3 times wider than long. Pronotum 2–3 times wider than long. Spermatheca well sclerotized (Fig. 20 B), over 2 times longer than wide; apex truncated, without velum; spermathecal duct weakly coiled. Comparative note. This species is distinguished from O. decemstillata by its spots on the pronotum, the separation between the elytral punctures, its smaller elytral spots, and the velum present in the spermatheca. Remarks. Ogdoecosta was previously known in México and Central America (Borowiec & Świętojańska 2015) but we provide the first record of O. guttifera in Venezuela. Host plant. Unknown. Known distribution. Guatemala: Sacatepéquez, Petén, Escuintla. México: Guerrero (Borowiec & Świętojańska 2016). Venezuela: No locality [new record]. Type material examined. Lectotype (des. L. Borowiec) (NHRS) (Figs 11 A–C). Guatemala, No locality. Additional material examined. 33 specimens with the following localities: México: Chiapas *: Motozintla, 7.IX.1980, H. R. Burker (TAMU, 1 male); México, F.C. Bowdich coll., Boucar (MCZ, 1 female, 2). Guatemala: SE Lago Atitan, Finca Santa Barbabara, IX.1966, P. Hubbell (NMNH, 1); Zapote, G.C. Ex. Coll. Godman and Salvin, Champion (MCZ, 1); Zapote, Gorhan coll., G.C. Champion (NMNH, 1 female); Guatemala coll. F.C. Bowdich (MCZ, 1 male, 3 females, 15). Venezuela: Venezuela, coll. F.C. Bowdich (MCZ, 1 male, 6).Published as part of López-Pérez, Sara, Zaragoza-Caballero, Santiago & Chaboo, Caroline S., 2016, Revision of Ogdoecosta Spaeth 1909 with description of Ogdoecosta paraflavomaculata López-Pérez, sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Mesomphaliini), pp. 410-440 in Zootaxa 4179 (3) on page 427, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4179.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/25993
Analisis Kesukaan Fillet Ikan Gabus Sambal Tempoyak dalam Kemasan Standing Pouch Solusi di Era Pandemi
Get PDFArafah, E, Sari R, Guttifera G. 2021. Snakehead fish tempoyak sauce fillets in standing pouch packaging solution in era pandemic. In: Herlinda S et al. (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimal ke-9 Tahun 2021, Palembang 20 Oktober 2021. pp. 884-890. Palembang: Penerbit & Percetakan Universitas Sriwijaya (UNSRI). Tempoyak is local product from South Sumatera made from fermented durian. Snakehead fish tempoyak sauce is a diversification product that available throughout the year. Snakehead fish tempoyak sauce in packaging pouch could be a choice as typical souvenir from South Sumatera and at the same time support Food for Tourism program or even as alternative souvenir from Palembang and solution in era pandemic. This study aimed to found the greatest formula between tempoyak and condiment to produce prefer and nutritious e.g. protein of tempoyak sauce. This study used different treatment for the amount of tempoyak i.e. A) A1 = 40 g, A2 = 50 g and A3 = 60 g. Different amount of condiment i.e. (B): B1= 100 g B2= 200 g and B3= 300 g. The organoleptic properties analysis such as appearance, texture and taste were determined. All the treatments were not statistically significant. Whereas, taste panelis testing result indicated both like and very like. The result showed that A3B2 combination with 60 g tempoyak dan 300 g condiment was the greatest treatment. So then, snakehead fillet tempoyak sauce was accepted by panelis
Two transgenic <i>gut y</i> stripe CRM-hsp<i>-wg</i> cDNA lines produced adult <i>D</i>. <i>guttifera</i> with dark stripes along the longitudinal veins of the wings.
No full texta, The wing of an adult D. guttifera, wild type. b, c, Ectopic wing pigmentation of adult D. guttifera expressing the wg cDNA construct. (TIF)</p
- …
