1,720,970 research outputs found

    Correction to: Branca, g., et al. forest protection unifies, silviculture divides: A sociological analysis of local stakeholders’ voices after coppicing in the marganai forest (sardinia, italy). forests 2020, 11, 708

    No full text
    We have recently been made aware by the Forests Editorial Offices of some errors and omissions in the Introduction Section 1.1.2 of our recent paper [1]. The authors wish to make the following corrections: 1. The fifth paragraph of said Introduction Section 1.1.2 currently reads as follows: In the same period, the professionals involved in the renewal of the plan for the Margani SCI expressed very strong concerns about the activation of coppice practices in the Marganai area. During the third participatory meeting, held in Iglesias in 2014, the professionals involved in this SCI’s planned renewal denounced the high risk of erosive phenomena triggered by such a silvicultural operation [21]. However, [22] questioned their results, showing that their data did not support their interpretation of the facts. To clarify this from a scientific standpoint, we would like to make the following corrections: In the same period, the professionals involved in the renewal of the plan for the Margani SCI expressed very strong concerns about the activation of coppice practices in the Marganai area [21]. During the participatory meeting, held in the Iglesias area in 2014, the professionals denounced the high risk of erosive phenomena triggered by such silvicultural operations [22]. However, Giadrossich et al. questioned the hypothesis of such risks in the Marganai forest [23]. 2. The References [21–23] currently read as follows: 21. Vacca, A.; Aru, F.; Ollesch, G. Short-term impact of coppice management on soil in a quercus ilex l. Stand of Sardinia. Land Degrad. Develop. 2017, 28, 553–565, doi:10.1002/ldr.2551. 22. Giadrossich, F.; Guastini, E. A critical analysis of Vacca, A., Aru, F., Ollesch, G. (2017). Short term impact of coppice management on soil in a Quercus ilex L. Stand in Sardinia. Land Degrad. Develop. 2019, 30, 1765–1885, doi:10.1002/ldr.3246. 23. Gruppo D’intervento Giuridico Onlus. La Foresta del Marganai e la Sua Poco Accorta Gestione. 2018. Available online: https://gruppodinterventogiuridicoweb.com/2018/10/21/la-foresta-del-marganai-e-la-sua-poco-accorta-gestione/ (accessed on 18 May 2020). The corrected references are provided below: 21. A.T.P “C.C.W.R” Progettazioni e Soluzioni Ambientali, Sviluppo Equo ed Ecosostenibile. Richiesta Incontro Tecnico: Discussione su Problematiche Riscontrate su Habitat Forestali in Area SIC MONTE LINAS-MARGANAI ITB041111 e limitrofe, 2015. Letter Addressed to the “Sardegna Regional Forest Service”, Dated 11 November 2014. Available online: https://gruppodinterventogiuridicoweb. files.wordpress.com/2015/01/richiesta-incontro-tecnico-ente-for.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2020). 22. Gruppo d’Intervento Giuridico odv. Foreste Demaniali Sarde e Direttiva Habitat, un Contributo del Dott. Francesco Aru. Available online: https://gruppodinterventogiuridicoweb. com/2014/06/20/foreste-demaniali-sarde-e-direttiva-habitat-un-contributo-del-dott-francesco-aru/ (accessed on 18 May 2020). 23. Giadrossich, F.; Guastini, E. A critical analysis of Vacca, A., Aru, F., Ollesch, G. (2017). Short term impact of coppice management on soil in a Quercus ilex L. Stand in Sardinia. Land Degrad. Develop. 2019, 30, 1765–1885, doi:10.1002/ldr.3246. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes while stating that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The published version will be updated on the article webpage, with a reference to this correction notice

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Un’esperienza di Kant (secondo Robert Gernhardt)

    No full text
    Il saggio prende le mosse da una poesia umoristica di Robert Gernhardt in cui viene descritta una singolare «esperienza» di Kant e chiama poi in gioco lo stesso Kant, soprattutto sul tema della convivialità

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore