1,720,960 research outputs found

    Tools and theory to improve data analysis

    No full text
    This thesis proposes a scientific model to explain the data analysis process. I argue that data analysis is primarily a procedure to build un- derstanding and as such, it dovetails with the cognitive processes of the human mind. Data analysis tasks closely resemble the cognitive process known as sensemaking. I demonstrate how data analysis is a sensemaking task adapted to use quantitative data. This identification highlights a uni- versal structure within data analysis activities and provides a foundation for a theory of data analysis. The model identifies two competing chal- lenges within data analysis: the need to make sense of information that we cannot know and the need to make sense of information that we can- not attend to. Classical statistics provides solutions to the first challenge, but has little to say about the second. However, managing attention is the primary obstacle when analyzing big data. I introduce three tools for managing attention during data analysis. Each tool is built upon a different method for managing attention. ggsubplot creates embedded plots, which transform data into a format that can be easily processed by the human mind. lubridate helps users automate sensemaking out- side of the mind by improving the way computers handle date-time data. Visual Inference Tools develop expertise in young statisticians that can later be used to efficiently direct attention. The insights of this thesis are especially helpful for consultants, applied statisticians, and teachers of data analysis

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Graphics for Statistics and Data Analysis with R

    Get PDF
    Abstracts not available for BookReview

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    R for Data Science

    No full text
    This E-textbook, written by statisticians Garrett Grolemund and Hadly Wickham, teaches learners how to use R to transform data, change its structure, visualize it, and model the data. The material has been designed for those with a data science background and focuses on using R to put data science into practice. Within each part, students learn how to perform a variety of functions that assist with using R for data science, such as importing data, tidying data, R markdown, transforming data, vectors, and more. The E-book has thirty chapters split into the following parts:Part 1: Data ExplorationPart 2: Data WranglingPart 3: ProgrammingPart 4: Data ModelingPart 5: Communicating DataThis version of R for Data Science has been superseded by new edition, which is available to view separately

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore