1,721,038 research outputs found
Goss v. Holt Boxing Poster, Mar. 1936
No full textUtah Power & Light Co., Goss v. Holt Boxing Poster, 3/20/36
Due Process Rights and High School Suspensions after Goss v. Lopez
Full text linkDue Process Rights And High School Suspensions After Goss v. Lope
Recommended from our members
Goss v. Lopez as a Vehicle to Examine Due Process Protection Issues with Alternative Schools
No full textCircuits are split on whether students are entitled to procedural protections before school officials may force them into alternative schools. This Note argues that students facing an involuntary transfer to a disciplinary alternative school are entitled to procedural protections under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Part I explains the trend toward the use of disciplinary alternative schools and the social and educational harms that these schools exacerbate. Part II explores the current circuit split around the procedural due process rights of students facing involuntary transfer to an alternative school. Part III argues that courts should expand the Supreme Court\u27s holding in Goss v. Lopez to ensure students receive due process protections before being involuntarily transferred to disciplinary alternative schools. Part IV addresses counterarguments and concludes that, by extending procedural protections to students facing involuntary alternative school transfers, courts can protect those most vulnerable from harmful disciplinary actions.
This abstract has been adapted from the author\u27s introduction
Goss v. Lopez as a Vehicle to Examine Due Process Protection Issues with Alternative Schools
Full text linkCircuits are split on whether students are entitled to procedural protections before school officials may force them into alternative schools. This Note argues that students facing an involuntary transfer to a disciplinary alternative school are entitled to procedural protections under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Part I explains the trend toward the use of disciplinary alternative schools and the social and educational harms that these schools exacerbate. Part II explores the current circuit split around the procedural due process rights of students facing involuntary transfer to an alternative school. Part III argues that courts should expand the Supreme Court\u27s holding in Goss v. Lopez to ensure students receive due process protections before being involuntarily transferred to disciplinary alternative schools. Part IV addresses counterarguments and concludes that, by extending procedural protections to students facing involuntary alternative school transfers, courts can protect those most vulnerable from harmful disciplinary actions.
This abstract has been adapted from the author\u27s introduction
Analysis of implementation and application of procedural due process required by Goss v Lopez
No full textThis dissertation examines the jurisprudence of student procedural due process rights. Review of the literature available prior to the recognition of student due process rights by the Supreme Court in Goss v. Lopez (1975) was performed and subsequently led to questions directly related to the emergence of due process protections. A detailed analysis of Goss v. Lopez (1975) identified student due process standards. Following the decision, courts cited the precedent on nearly two thousand five hundred occasions. Review of these citations yielded eighty-six cases relevant to analysis of implementation and application of the Goss precedent. Finally, the patterns of interruption and application and unanswered questions were identified; Since 1975 Federal Courts have been called upon to interpret and apply the Goss precedent. This study investigates the implementation and application of Goss by Federal Courts. This study targeted student due process. In reviewing case law dealing with the administration of the Fourteenth Amendment, the study determined how the various federal courts have interpreted and applied the Goss landmark over the past three decades. This study also reviewed Nevada Revises Statues and Clark County School District Policy and Regulations to determine their consistency with Goss v. Lopez. Special attention to cases in which school administrators were questioned with regard to the application of due process during student discipline procedures was presented. Finally, the study sought to identify patterns in the courts\u27 rulings that provide guidance for today\u27s school administrators faced with student discipline issues.*; *This dissertation is a compound document (contains both a paper copy and a CD as part of the dissertation)
Due Process in School Discipline: The Effect of Goss v. Lopez
Full text linkCourts which have faced the question of whether the due process clause applies to school disciplinary hearings have held both ways. Until recently, the United States Supreme Court had declined to hear the issue. This changed, however, with the Court\u27s five to four decision in Goss v. Lopez, where the court held that the due process clause does apply to school disciplinary proceedings. This Comment will analyze Goss and compare it with the case law developed in the lower courts
Student Rights Under the Due Process Clause . . . Suspensions from Public Schools; Goss v. Lopez
Full text linkIN ADDRESSING ITSELF to the constitutionality of Section 3316.66 of the Ohio Revised Code,\u27 the United States Supreme Court in Goss v. Lopez has ruled for the first time upon the extent to which the rights of students are to be protected under the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment in conjunction with any disciplinary removal from a public school. By its action the Court has tacitly undertaken to lift the cloud on student rights which has existed under the common law doctrine of in loco parentis, and interpose procedural safeguards upon any decision of school officials to deprive a student of educational benefits
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
